• Care Home
  • Care home

Sandfields

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

St Georges Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 3EL 0333 321 0921

Provided and run by:
Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Sandfields on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Sandfields, you can give feedback on this service.

18 January 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Sandfields is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care to up to 90 people. The service provides support to older people and people living with a diagnosis of dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 71 people using the service.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were supported by staff who understood how to keep them safe from the risk of abuse. Appropriate safeguarding procedures were in place and staff had been trained in how to protect people from abuse.

People's individual needs were assessed, and clear care plans and risk assessments were in place to help staff support people safely in accordance with their preferences.

Risks relating to the environment had been assessed and there was an effective audit system in place in relation to all areas of the home.

Medicines were managed effectively. Medicines were administered by trained staff and people told us they felt medicines were administered safely.

Staff had been recruited safely. The registered manager had developed the staff rota to ensure that people received consistent care from staff who knew them well.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The registered manager modelled good practice and led by example. Staff and relatives spoke positively about the leadership within the home.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. We considered this guidance as there were people using the service who have a learning disability and or who are autistic.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published 30 August 2017).

Why we inspected

We received concerns in relation to safeguarding and staffing. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only.

We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the safe and well-led sections of this full report.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. The overall rating for the service has remained the same.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Sandfields on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

4 July 2017

During a routine inspection

We inspected Sandfields on 4 and 5 July 2017. Sandfields provides accommodation and nursing and personal care for up to 90 older people and people living with dementia. At the time of our visit, 68 people were using the service. Sandfields is split over six units, at this inspection one of these units was currently not being utilised. This was an unannounced inspection. At this inspection, we also followed up on concerns raised following a HM Coroner’s inquest in March 2017.

We last inspected the home on 30 and 31 July 2015. At the July 2015 inspection the service was meeting all of the requirements of the regulations and was rated as “Good”. However we found that good practice had not always been established and maintained in relation to maintaining people’s care records. During this inspection we found the provider had improved the recording of people’s risk management plans and staff had the information they needed to know how to keep people safe.

There was a registered manager in post. The registered manager was also the provider of the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People enjoyed living at Sandfields. People and their relatives told us they or their relatives were safe at the service and enjoyed active and social lives. People had access to activities which were tailored to their individual needs and preferences. People felt cared for and happy.

People were supported with their ongoing healthcare needs. Care and nursing staff supported people to access the healthcare support they required. People told us they enjoyed the food they received within the home, and had access to all the food and fluids they needed. Where people needed support to meet their nutritional needs, these needs were met.

People were supported by care and nursing staff who were supported and trained to meet people’s individual needs. Staff were supported to develop and access additional training to further improve their skills. All staff we spoke with felt supported and were positive about working at the service.

People and their relatives spoke positively about the management of the service. The registered manager ensured people, their relatives and external healthcare professionals’ views were listened to and acted upon. The registered manager had systems to assess, monitor and improve the quality of service people received at Sandfields.

30 and 31 July 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 30 and 31 July 2015 and was unannounced. Sandfields is a purpose built new home which provides accommodation for up to 90 people who require nursing and personal care over three floors. Each floor was divided into two 15 bedded units, with its own dining room and lounge. At the time of our inspection, there were only four of the six units open, of which 49 bedrooms were occupied. Each bedroom had private toilet and shower facilities. People had access to a secured garden, cinema, coffee area and hobbies room as well as the hair salon.

A registered manager was in place as required by their conditions of registration. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they enjoyed living at Sandfields. People’s individual risks had been assessed however, guidance on how to reduce people’s risk was not always recorded. Staff knew people well and were able to support people with their needs and risks. Their individual needs were thoroughly assessed before they moved into the home. People received additional care and treatment from other health care services when needed. Staff encouraged people to have a well-balanced and nutritional diet. Group and individual activities were provided at Sandfields. People’s medicines were administered and stored effectively.

Staff knew how to report any concerns of abuse to the relevant safeguarding authorities. Policies to protect people were in place to give staff guidance. People told us they felt safe at the home and there were enough staff to meet their needs. Thorough recruitment checks and an induction programme were carried out with new staff before they provided care to people. Training plans and systems were in place to ensure people were cared for by staff who received regular training and support from their line manager. Staff told us they felt supported and trained to carry out their role.

People and their relatives spoke highly of the staff and the registered manager. Relatives told us any day to day concerns, which they had raised, were always dealt with immediately. The registered manager valued people’s feedback and responded to any concerns. Complaints were managed effectively and actions were put in place to prevent the concern reoccurring.

Monitoring systems were in place to ensure the services were operating effectively and safely. Internal and external audits were carried out to continually monitor the overall services provided.

25 June 2014

During a routine inspection

An adult social care inspector carried out this inspection. The focus of the inspection was to answer five key questions; is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

As part of this inspection we spoke with the registered manager, three members of staff and five people who lived in the home. We also spoke to relatives and visitors. We observed staff interacting with people who lived in the home. We reviewed the care records relating to the management of the home which included five care plans, daily care records, accident and incident records and quality assurance systems.

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary describes what people who lived in the home and staff told us, what we observed and the records we looked at.

Is the service safe?

People were safe because staff understood the needs of the people who lived in the home. Care was delivered as planned in people's care records. The home was cleaned and maintained. Maintenance records showed the home was regularly checked and maintained. The registered manager and staff were aware of their role in the prevention of harm to vulnerable people. Emergency procedures were in place should they be needed.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards which applies to care homes. While no applications have needed to be submitted, proper policies and procedures were in place. Relevant staff were trained to understand when an application should be made, and how to submit one.

Is the service effective?

People received an effective service because staff had a good understanding of people's needs. Relatives said, "Staff are very good, very friendly'. We saw staff supporting people who got upset in an appropriate manner. People were involved in their care planning. People had a choice of foods and drinks.

Is the service caring?

People received a service which was caring because people's wishes were acknowledged and respected. As people's needs changed, staff knew how to manage and adapt their care effectively. Staff were observed communicating with people in a kind and sensitive way. People who lived in the home were calm and relaxed around staff. Staff supported and orientated people if they became confused.

Is the service responsive?

This service was responsive because people received support and care when they needed it. A visitor said, "Staff will listen and help if we have a concern". The registered manager managed complaints in line with the provider's policies and procedures. Relatives told us they could always speak to the registered manager if there was a problem. We saw the registered manager responding to an incident when a person became upset about a member of staff. This was dealt with immediately and appropriately.

People's health needs were regularly monitored and reviewed by the local GPs. Referrals were quickly made to health services when people's needs changed. People's care needs were reviewed monthly to ensure that the support and care provided was appropriate.

Is the service well-led?

The service was well led as there were effective arrangements in place to review and monitor care practices in the home. The management team understood the principles of quality assurance to improve the service and quality of life for people who lived in the home.