• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Lowther Street

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

81 Lowther Street, Whitehaven, Cumbria, CA28 7RB (01946) 691234

Provided and run by:
Croftlands Trust

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

17th and 23rd April 2015

During a routine inspection

The first day of the inspection was unannounced on 17th April 2015. We returned on the 23rd April to meet with the registered manager and the operations manager.

81 Lowther Street is a Georgian house in the centre of Whitehaven that has been adapted to provide short term accommodation for people with mental health issues.

All referrals for short term care are referred through the mental health team. There is no charge for a stay in the service. The home aims to prevent people from having admissions to hospital and to help people reintegrate after a hospital in-patient stay.

The house can take up to six people in individual rooms. There are a number of shared lounge areas and small kitchens on each floor of the building.

The service is operated by the Croftlands Trust who provide residential accommodation and community support throughout Cumbria. The Croftlands Trust has merged with the Richmond Fellowship and a number of changes were underway in the service.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People in the service told us they felt safe in the property. Suitable security arrangements were in place.

Staff understood their responsibilities in protecting vulnerable adults. People told us that staff treated them appropriately.

There were enough staff on duty to give good levels of support. Recruitment was managed properly. The organisation had suitable disciplinary processes.

Infection control and medicines management were managed correctly.

We looked at evidence provided about training for staff and we judged that training was out of date for some staff. The operations manager said that training had not been as well planned as it should have been. We saw a robust plan that would allow for this to be dealt with during the year.

Staff did show a good understanding of the work they did. Supervision and staff development was underway.

No one in the home was deprived of their liberty. Restraint was not used in the service. Good arrangements were in place to ensure consent was sought.

People in the home were encouraged and supported to get physical and mental health support from professionals. Healthy eating was promoted in the service.

The house was not suitable for people with complex physical disabilities. This was explained prior to admission.

People told us that the staff were caring and were able to give them the right level of support to encourage recovery and independence.

There were regular house meetings and people were encouraged to participate fully in recovery plans. Advocacy was available.

People were given privacy in the house and told us the staff treated them with dignity and allowed them their rights.

Assessments and care plans were detailed and up to date. People were involved with the planning of their care and support. Staff encouraged people to maintain skills and engage in social activities.

Complaints were suitably managed.

Good arrangements were in place for people moving between different support services.

The management of the home was being dealt with appropriately and a number of updates were being made to the systems and procedures in the home.

The registered manager was trained and experienced in management and had a background in mental health nursing. This meant that the manager could lead the staff appropriately in supporting people with on-going mental health needs.

The registered manager and his line manager told us of the plans in place to update and improve on the monitoring of quality. We had evidence to show that quality assurance was already in place and that new systems were being introduced.

The team worked well with local mental health practitioners and mental health professionals told us that the service was of great benefit to people with relapsing mental illnesses.

7 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke to the two people who were in residence in the service when we visited and we also spoke to some people who had previously used the service. Here are some of the things they told us.

"This is a 24-hour service because I don't sleep much when I am unwell. I found that being able to talk to staff even in the middle of the night was really helpful. I think this service is wonderful' It is really excellent and I know it's there for me if I need it. It is so much better than being on a ward. It is homely and the staff are marvellous."

"Quite simply they saved my life."

"I have been here before and I know that when I am becoming ill I can go there and get myself back on track."

We also looked at how people's nutritional needs were met and we found that people were given choices and that staff supported them to have a healthy diet. One person said:

"They are very accommodating and you have the food you want. Some people are on diets or are diabetics and they are helped to have the right kind of food. I like to bake and I was encouraged to do this and it was nice that other people appreciated what I did. I felt I gave something back."

We walked around the building and we could see that the house was clean and orderly. Some areas of the house needed redecorating and we asked the manager to look into this.

We also looked at how new members of staff were recruited and how the organisation dealt with any issues of poor practice. We found that people were recruited appropriately and that any issues with staff members' employment were dealt with in a suitable manner.

We look at a wide range of records that supported the evidence we already had to show that this service was running smoothly.

2 October 2012

During a routine inspection

People in this service told us they were able to consent to the care and treatment provided and that staff took into account any restrictions placed on them under the Mental Health Act.

We had positive responses when we asked people about the care and support they received:

"I am pleased to be here and I have had good help from the staff."

We checked on the arrangements in place for supporting people with medication and these were in order.

Staff in the project told us they received suitable levels of support in their role and were given training that met their needs.

The project had good systems in place to measure the quality of the service and the satisfaction levels of people who used the service.

24 May 2011

During a routine inspection

Lowther Street is a crisis intervention service, providing support and accommodation at short notice to people who need support due to their mental health needs. Admissions are not generally planned but people are referred as and when they are assessed as likely to benefit from the support provided at the service. As part of our review of the service we visited on 24 May 2011. At our visit there was no-one staying at the service so we could not speak to people who were using the service or observe how people were supported.

To gain the views of people who use the service we asked the registered manager to contact some of the people who had been supported there recently and ask their permission for us to contact them. We carried out a number of telephone interviews with people after they had stayed at the service and with the staff who had supported them.

People who used the service who we spoke to by telephone told us Lowther Street provided them with a good service which met their needs. People made many positive comments about the staff who worked at the service and told us they had the skills and knowledge to provide a good standard of care.

People told us:

"It's a good service"

"I'd recommend the service to other people"

"It's excellent"

"It's good to know it's there if I need to use it again"