• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Micado Homes - St Mary's Road

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

38 St Mary's Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB3 2JP (020) 8573 9035

Provided and run by:
Micado Homes Limited

All Inspections

17 and 20 July 2015

During a routine inspection

Micado -St Mary’s Road provides accommodation for up to five adults who have mental health needs. There were four people living in the service at the time of the inspection and one person was in hospital.

The registered manager informed us that there were plans to change the service from a residential care home to a supported living service. Supported living is where people would have their own tenancy and if they do not require assistance with personal care then the home they live in might not require to be registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). The people living in the service only required prompting to take their medicines and did not need assistance or prompting to manage their personal care needs. There was no date for when this would be taking place but people had been consulted about this potential change in the service they were living in.

This inspection visit was unannounced and took place on 17 and 20 July 2015. At the last inspection in 2013 there were no breaches of the Regulations.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The rota showed that over a period of several weeks at least twice a week waking night staff had been starting their shifts earlier than 8pm and therefore were awake and working over twelve hours each shift. Sometimes they were working fifteen to seventeen hours. Waking night support workers were working alone and without taking a break. By working over twelve hours on some shifts the provider could not be confident that people were being supported safely and that waking night support workers were able to carry out their duties appropriately.

There were systems in place to record some of the medicines being delivered to the service. However, we found some medicines stored by the service where the quantity had not been recorded. Therefore it was not always clear how much of different medicines people had been administered.

There were some systems in place to monitor the safety and quality of the service. However, these had not been fully effective in highlighting the shortfalls identified during this inspection.

People said they felt safe living in the service and spoke positively about the support they received.

Healthcare professionals were also complimentary about the care and support people received from the registered manager and support workers.

There were appropriate procedures for safeguarding adults and the support workers were aware of these.

The provider had acted in accordance with their legal requirements under the Mental Capacity Act

2005 and the Deprivation of Liberties Safeguards. They ensured people were given choices and the opportunities to make decisions. People did not have restrictions in the service and people we spoke with confirmed that they had choices in their everyday lives.

The registered manager and support workers were caring, and treated people with dignity and respect. Care plans were clear and written in a way to address each person’s individual needs.

The support worker we spoke with and records we saw confirmed recruitment procedures were being followed.

New support workers received an induction to working in the service. Ongoing training and support was available for the support workers to ensure they had the necessary skills and information to work in the service.

People could choose what they ate and support workers were available to provide support and assistance with meals.

People felt confident to express any concerns and make a complaint, so that these could be addressed. The provider asked people for their views about the service.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 in relation to waking night staff working long hours, medicines not always being recorded when they were stored in the service and shortfalls in carrying out or recording the monitoring of the service.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

4 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with the manager of the home and four people who were using the service at the time of our inspection. People told us that they were asked for their consent for any support provided by the service and we saw that people had signed to say they consented to the content of their care plans.

We found that people's needs had been assessed and an appropriate care plan developed to meet them. People told us they were supported to take part in social activities. For example, people were encouraged to visit family and friends and travel independently on public transport where they were able. One person said, "I like it a lot here, I can paint, knit and draw and the staff are very kind." Another person told us, "we go bowling, for a Chinese meal and we've been Brighton."

There were systems in place to ensure that medicines were managed safely in the home whilst considering people's individual needs.

There were suitable arrangements in place to ensure that there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs at all times.

The home had a system in place for responding to complaints about the service and people told us they felt able to raise any concerns with the staff team. One person said, "if I had a complaint I would speak to the manager and she would do something about it."

17 October 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit to Micado Homes St Marys we spoke with three people using the service and two staff members. All people we spoke with told us that they were happy and enjoyed living at the home as they felt independent. One person said' it is good here, I feel so much better and I am able to live as I like'.