• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: North Tyneside Council Domiciliary Care Agency

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

3rd Floor Quadrant West, Silverlink North, Cobalt Buisness Park, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE27 0BY (0191) 643 7429

Provided and run by:
North Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

23, 24, 26 June and 6 July 2015

During a routine inspection

This announced inspection took place on 23, 24, 26 June and 6 July 2015. We last inspected the service in November 2013. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all the regulations that we inspected.

North Tyneside Council Domiciliary Care Agency is a free short term enablement service split into four area locations across North Tyneside. The service provides personal care and support to people in their own homes, often following a discharge from hospital or referral from primary care services and usually lasting six weeks on average. At the time of the inspection support was provided to 170 adults living in their own homes. We were aware that these figures will fluctuate due to the nature of the service. We were shown documents that reported 1665 referrals being received during 2014 to date.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Medicines administration records and medicines risk assessments needed to be improved. We have made a recommendation.

People told us they felt safe. There were safeguarding policies and procedures in place. Staff knew what actions they would take if abuse was suspected. The provider had dealt with previous safeguarding concerns appropriately.

Accidents and incidents were recorded and dealt with effectively by the provider. Where issues (including complaints) had occurred, actions had been taken and lessons learnt.

The provider had plans in place to deal with emergency situations and provided an out of hours on-call system, manned by senior staff. Plans were also in place to continue care delivery in the event of adverse weather conditions.

There was enough suitably recruited and vetted staff to provide quality care to people in their own homes. The provider had ensured the staff were trained to provide the care people needed. This included basic training, as well as more specialised training using healthcare professionals when required.

The registered manager understood the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and told us no one was subject to a court of protection order. People were encouraged to make their own decisions and where they could not, best interest decisions were made.

Some people received support with eating and drinking as part of their care package. People were provided with meals they had chosen and preferred and staff ensured drinks were left between visits for people if they required them.

Staff provided equipment for people to use in their own homes, like perching stools or shower seats.

People told us the care provided by the staff was second to none. They described it as ‘outstanding and superb’. Staff provided people with information that enabled them to understand the service they were receiving and how to complain if they needed to. There had been two complaints and they had been dealt with effectively. People told us their independence was restored by staff at the service who had supported them.

People were assessed and care plans were drawn up. When people’s changing needs were identified, they were discussed and support was tailored to suit the individual.

People and staff told us the service was well managed. A range of checks were made to ensure people’s care was monitored and the quality of the service was maintained and improved upon. People were asked for their views of the service through the use of questionnaires. Comments about the service were significantly positive.

The provider had not sent us notifications which are a legal requirement of their registration regarding, for example safeguarding incidents and deaths. After requesting further information we have judged these latest findings to demonstrate on going breaches of regulations. We have taken enforcement action against the provider and the registered manager and will report further when this action is complete.

4, 7 November 2013

During a routine inspection

At the time of our inspection the manager of the service was in the process of registering with the Care Quality Commission.

We visited three people in their own homes and had telephone conversations with 13. People told us they were always asked for their consent before staff provided them with care and support. Comments included, "The staff are pleasant and polite and always ask me what I want help with" and "They always ask before they do anything."

People told us they were happy with the service and it was efficient and reliable. We viewed the care records for five people and found that care needs were assessed, planned and delivered in a way which met people's individual needs. People's comments included, "I couldn't praise the whole service enough" and "Marvellous service."

We found there were appropriate arrangements in place to assist people with their medication according to their needs.

Staff were well supported and received regular supervision to help them carry out their roles. People who used the service said the staff were well trained and did a good job. Their comments included, "They are great and very good at their jobs."

We found the provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service. People told us they felt confident to discuss any concerns they had with the manager and staff. They all said they had never needed to complain.

7 August 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Domiciliary Care Services

We carried out a themed inspection looking at domiciliary care services. We asked people to tell us what it was like to receive services from this home care agency as part of a targeted inspection programme of domiciliary care agencies, paying particular regard to how people's dignity was upheld and how they could make choices about their care. The inspection team was led by a CQC (Care Quality Commission) inspector joined by an Expert by Experience who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of service.

As part of this review, we visited four people in their own homes and spoke with them, and their relatives, about their experiences of the support they had received from this service. At the time of our visit to the service, we spoke with the manager, one care co-ordinator and three care workers. We spoke over the telephone with a further 22 people who used the service and one relative.

People we spoke with were positive about the care and support they received. Comments included, 'I couldn't complain about any of the girls,' 'It (the service) allows me to get back in my own home and get fit' and 'It's a good service because it's really helped me.'

One relative told us, 'X is quite pleased with them as well, I can't thank them enough.' Another relative said, 'If I had to give them a score out of 100, it would be 100.'

People told us they felt comfortable and safe with their care workers. People also told us they would feel comfortable speaking to the office staff about any issues which may arise. One person told us, 'They are very helpful when I ring them (the office).'