• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

CFT Care Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Tuctaway, Oaktree Drive, Clacton-on-sea, CO15 2DN

Provided and run by:
CFT Care Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 18 March 2026 to 16 April 2026.

This service provides personal care and support to people living in a range of supported living schemes. This includes both shared and single accommodation. They can provide a service to people with a learning disability and autistic people, people who require support with their mental health needs and people with physical and sensory needs. At the time of the inspection, 59 people were in receipt of the regulated activity of personal care.

We carried out this inspection following a review of the information we held about the service. This was a comprehensive inspection covering all key questions and quality statements. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. We found the provider was not always delivering care in line with these principles.
At the last inspection, this service was rated good. At this inspection we found improvements were required. The provider was in breach of the legal regulations relating to safe care and treatment, consent to care, person-centred care and good governance.

The provider did not have effective governance processes in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service. Concerns were not always promptly identified and addressed.
Risks to people’s safety were not always assessed appropriately. Staff did not always have the right skills, qualifications and experience to support people safely. People did not always receive person-centred care which promoted their independence and enabled them to lead full and active lives. People’s capacity to make decisions and give consent was not always effectively assessed and documented.

People and those important to them did not always feel listened to. Managers had not always ensured staff received training and regular supervisions and appraisals to maintain high-quality care. People’s care was not consistently dignified and respectful. The provider did not work with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services.
However, we found people were involved in the initial assessments of their needs. The provider ensured information was available in formats people could understand and worked to eliminate discrimination. The provider valued diversity in their workforce.

At the time of the inspection, the provider had recognised areas where improvements were required and had implemented a service development plan. A recent management restructure had taken place to promote clearer responsibilities and accountability. The management team were able to demonstrate how they were increasing contact with people, relatives and staff to improve opportunities for feedback. There were also planned improvements to the care planning and recording system. However, observations, feedback from people, relatives, staff and professionals and documentation reviewed identified recurring concerns with communication and the consistency of people’s care and support.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this inspection.
 

26 April 2023

During a routine inspection

About the service

CFT Care Limited provides personal care and support to people living in a range of supported living schemes. This included both shared and single accommodation. They can provide a service to people with learning disabilities, autistic people, people with a physical or sensory need and people living with dementia.

At the time of the inspection 43 people were using the service. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

The service was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture.’

Right Support:

People were encouraged to play an active role in maintaining their own health and wellbeing and supported to have access to specialist health and social care support in the community. Staff knew how people preferred to take their medicines to achieve best possible health outcomes.

Staff supported people to take part in activities and pursue their interests in their local area, for 1 person they said they liked, “Going fishing.” Although the level of support received varied, dependant on the person’s funding and support plan, staff used a flexible, caring approach to ensure people did not become socially isolated.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. The service worked with people to plan for when they experienced periods of distress so that their freedoms were restricted only if there was no alternative.

Right Care:

Staff promoted people's equality and diversity they had a good understanding of people’s individual communication needs, to ensure their voice was heard. People received kind and compassionate care from motivated staff who protected and respected people’s privacy and dignity. One person’s relative commented, “The level of care and conscientiousness of the staff…couldn’t have chosen better.”

People’s comprehensive support plans provided staff detailed guidance on the level of support they wanted, which was kept under review and updated to meet the person’s changing needs and aspirations.

Staff benefited from having a dedicated training facility and full-time trainer which ensured staff were appropriately skilled to meet people’s needs and keep them safe.

Right Culture:

People’s quality of life was enhanced by the service’s culture of improvement and inclusivity. The provider and management had a strong visible presence within the service and placed people's wishes, needs and rights at the heart of everything they did. One person’s relative told us, " It’s well led, and I have never had to approach the manager. I am absolutely happy with everything.”

The service enabled people and those important to them to work with staff to develop the service. Staff valued and acted upon people’s views. The provider was open and honest about some feedback they had received, and what action they had taken to address it.

Staff told us they enjoyed their work and felt supported by the management who they described as approachable. We observed people at ease with staff, with staff demonstrating the provider’s values, of supporting people to be as independent as possible and have a good quality life.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

This service was registered with us on 22 November 2021, and this is the first inspection.

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.