• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Wyvern Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

154 Milton Road, Weston Super Mare, Somerset, BS23 2UZ (01934) 413388

Provided and run by:
Mrs Pauline Ann Johnson & Mr Brian Edwin Johnson

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

3, 7 and 23 July 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on the 3, 7 and 23 July 2015 and was unannounced.

Wyvern Lodge provides accommodation for up to 16 older people who require personal and/or nursing care.

At the time of our visit there were 14 people living in the home. Wyvern Lodge is set over three floors. The ground floor has five bedrooms, two toilets and a bathroom, along with two communal lounges, a laundry room, a dining area, kitchen and access to the outside garden and patio area and the manager’s office. The first floor has four rooms, the medication cupboard, airing cupboard and toilet and the second floor has five bedrooms. Not all bedrooms have en- suite shower rooms.

There was no registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. We have received a application for a registered manager; this is currently going through the registration process. There has not been a registered manager since April 2013. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are registered persons. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At Wyvern Lodge the manager is also the owner/provider of the service. We are currently monitoring the registered manager’s application.

People experienced poor standards of cleanliness and inappropriate infection control measures throughout Wyvern Lodge. Staff did not follow guidelines relating to soiled and contaminated laundry or ensured personal protective equipment was used appropriately. Staff did not follow safe administration of medicines and medicines training was out of date.

People were not protected from the risk of harm. There was lack of risk assessments that identified risks to people and how these risks were being managed. Personal evacuation plans were out of date and had not been updated when people moved rooms.

People’s rights were not protected due to the provider failing to ensure mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were in place for people who were unable to make decisions about their care and treatment. Regular meetings were held to enable people to make suggestions regarding any changes.

People told us they felt safe in the home. Recruitment procedures did not always ensure staff had received appropriate checks before they started employment to ensure they were of good character or fit to work with vulnerable people. Staffing levels were variable and affected the cleaning throughout the home, as care staff were expected to pick up this additional role when the cleaner was off. People were supported by staff who did not receive adequate supervision and appraisals. There was a lack of mandatory training so staff did not have adequate skills.

People had choice and flexibility with the meals provided. There were opportunities for people to access their local community and enjoy activities. People were supported by staff who demonstrated a kind and caring approach. Care was provided by staff who knew people well. People told us they were treated with dignity and respect.

There were no audits and monitoring processes in place to ensure the service recognised and took action when improvements were required. People felt comfortable raising concerns or complaints with the provider, however not all comments and issues had been logged as a complaint and no actions had been taken as a result. People were at risk because not all incidents and accidents were recorded and appropriate actions were not taken as a result.

We found breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

29 May 2013

During a routine inspection

When we visited 13 people were using the service. We spoke with nine people and met with three members of staff, the deputy manager and the provider. The majority of our visit was spent with the people who used the service. We were also able to observe how staff interacted with the people who lived at the home.

The atmosphere in the home was relaxed and inclusive. We saw that people moved freely around the home and that they could access their bedrooms whenever they wished. One person told us 'I go out every morning to get my newspaper.' Another said 'I can go out whenever I want. There are no strict rules here. We are just like one big happy family.'

We looked at two care plans. These contained assessments of need and outlined how needs would be met. The people we spoke with were positive about the care and support they received. Comments included 'there is nothing I would change. I just cannot fault anything' and 'I am in very safe hands here. Everyone is so very kind.'

We looked at the home's procedures for the management and administration of people's medicines. We saw that all medicines had been stored securely and had only been administered by staff who had received appropriate training.

Robust staff recruitment procedures had been followed which meant that risks to people who used the service were minimised.

People using the service were provided with opportunities to express a view on the quality of the service they received.

4 July 2012

During a routine inspection

At the time of this inspection 13 people, which included one person in hospital, lived at the home. We spoke with eight people who lived at the home, four members of staff and the provider.

People told us they were able to make choices about all aspects of their daily lives. During our visit we observed that people moved freely around the home and they were able to access their bedrooms when ever they wished. Comments included 'It is so relaxed here and I can do as I please.', 'this is my home and there are no strict rules here' and 'I have a key to my room and to the front door. I enjoy popping out to the shops'.

People told us they had been consulted about their preferences for food, drink, activities and daily routines. Comments included 'the staff are more like my family and they all know me very well'. We saw that people appeared very comfortable in the presence of staff and it was evident staff knew them well.

People who lived at the home told us they were treated with respect by the staff who supported them. Comments included 'all the staff are so kind and I am always treated with respect' and 'the staff are very respectful.' One person explained how staff respected their privacy when assisting them to have a bath.

Staff interactions were noted to be kind and respectful and the atmosphere in the home was relaxed, happy and inclusive.

People spoken with were very positive about the care and support they received. Comments included 'I am very well looked after here. I can think of nothing that they could improve on', 'I can't praise the staff enough. They are so kind and patient with everyone here.' People confirmed that staff responded promptly for any requests for assistance. They said 'if you ring your call bell they are there straight away' and 'there is always someone there to help you'.

People were positive about the meals offered at the home. Comments included 'the cook is marvellous. We have a choice every day and if you don't like what is on offer she will cook you something else' and 'the food is excellent and there is plenty of it'.

No concerns were raised with us during our visit and people told us that they would feel comfortable raising concerns if they had any. Comments included 'all the staff and the owner are very approachable and I know they would deal with any concerns you had' and 'I don't have any concerns but if I did I know that it would be sorted out straight away'.

We did not observe staff administering people's medication during our inspection. People spoken with told us that they received their medicines when they needed them. Comments included 'I always get my tablets at the right time' and 'they keep my tablets safe and make sure I get them at the right time.'

People spoken with told us that their views were sought on a daily basis. Comments included 'they check that you are happy with everything all the time', 'the staff here encourage you to speak up because they wouldn't want you to be unhappy or worried'.

23 March and 1 April 2011

During a routine inspection

The people that spoke to us were positive in their views of how they are supported by the staff team and the manager who leads them. Examples of the comments made to us included, 'the staff are observant to the needs of their clients there is a positive and happy atmosphere in the home', and 'all the staff are extremely caring'.

People who use the service feel that Wyvern Lodge is their home, one person told us, 'this is my home and I wouldn't want to be anywhere else'. We were given a tour of the main parts of the home by one of the people who lives there. This action by the person concerned helps convey how people feel that Wyvern Lodge is their own home.

People are being well supported with their personal care needs by the staff. We saw the staff team work hard supporting people with their care in a kind and respectful way. We noticed that people who live at the home have built up close and warm relationships with the care staff who support them.

People who use the service each have a care plan written about their range of needs. Care plans are a record to guide staff and explain what care and support a person needs. We read care plans that had been written in a simple and easy to understand format. We found the information in the care plans is helpful and detailed enough to guide staff to provide consistent, suitable care to people who use the service.

People who use the service are able to make choices of what meals they wish to eat at the home. There is a tasty and well cooked menu of meal options available that ensure people have their nutritional needs met.

People who use the service live in a homely and comfortable environment. This is in part because the home is a residential style building. People told us they like the environment and feel happy living in the home.

People benefit because the manager effectively monitors and supervises the staff who care for them. We did find that there are shortfalls in the staff training programme, as some staff have not done recent relevant training. However we saw evidence that the owner of the home has booked staff on forthcoming training courses next month. This training for staff in a range of subjects relevant to the care of people who use the service needs to take place. This is to ensure people are cared for by staff who know how to give them the support they need.

We saw that people who use the service are asked their views of the quality of service and care they receive. We also saw that the manager acts on the views of people who use the service. She uses their opinions to try and improve overall outcomes for them even more.

People benefit from the managers approach to addressing complaints about the service. When complaints are made, these are fully responded to by the manager and resolved where possible, to the satisfaction of the person making the complaint.