• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Options

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Windsor House, Greville Road, Barbourne, Bristol, BS3 1LL (0117) 966 7451

Provided and run by:
Selborne Care Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

05 and 07 January 2015

During a routine inspection

We undertook an announced inspection of Options on 5 and 7 January 2015. We told the provider two days before our visit that we would be coming. This was to ensure staff were available in the office to see us. Options provides personal care services to people in their own homes, specifically people who have a learning disability. At the time of our inspection 13 people were receiving support with personal care. Options also provide social support to around 90 people in the community.

At our last inspection in December 2013 the service was meeting the regulations inspected.

The service has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There were systems in place to help keep people safe from unnecessary risks to their safety and wellbeing. There were enough staff to ensure people’s needs were met in a flexible way.

Staff were provided with regular training and understood what their roles and responsibilities were. The staff team had the right skills and experience to effectively assist people with their care and support needs.

The staff understood about the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and its impact on people they supported. They knew that this meant people had the right to make decisions about their care. They also understood that it meant people were to be properly supported and their rights protected when they were not able to give consent .

Staff supported people to meet their healthcare needs. Staff assisted people to go to GP appointments and to see other healthcare professionals when it was required.

People were consulted and involved in planning how their needs were met. They were supported by staff who were kind and caring in their approach. One person told us “ I get on brilliantly with the staff they have helped me a lot ”.

Where it was an identified need for people, they were supported to plan and cook a healthy and nutritious diet.

Recruitment and staff selection procedures were in place which helped minimise the risk of unsuitable staff being employed to work with people.

Staff felt supported by the registered manager and the office based manager who managed the staff team. There was an open and accessible management culture for people who used the services and the staff.

The registered manager carried out regular reviews with people to find out directly what they felt about the quality of the service provided. For example one person changed to a different member of staff supporting them based on the feedback they gave the manager.

12 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three relatives of people receiving support as part of our inspection. We also spoke with one person receiving support by phone and met with three people in their homes. We also viewed the results of the provider's most recent feedback questionnaire. We heard about some individual issues with support but overall people reported being happy with the service they received. This was reflected in the results of the survey we viewed. People told us they felt able to raise concerns if they needed to.

People's care and support was planned and reviewed regularly. Relevant risk assessments were in place to ensure that people were cared for safely. There were suitable arrangements in place for supporting people with their medications safely.

There were suitable arrangements in place for recruiting new staff and this included undertaking background checks and seeking references. There were systems in place for monitoring the quality of the service provided and this included seeking feedback from people who used the service.

15 June 2012

During a routine inspection

Because of the nature of individual's disability we were only able to talk with three people who receive a service. We did however speak to relatives about the quality of the service.

One person who receives a service told us they found the staff: "kind and friendly" and "I have never been unhappy about the help I get they are all nice people". Another person told us: "I get the help I want" and "everything is alright nothing to be unhappy about".

Carers we spoke with told us they were very happy with the service their family member receives. One told us: "staff are all very approachable and very caring" and "I am very pleased with them its a good service". Another carer said how the support workers always treated their family member with respect and they commented on how the service always trys to match the right support worker. They said this made all the difference to the individual and they would always know if they were unhappy about anything but this had never happened.

One of the compliment letters received by the provider said: "the service we have received has been superb with great care taken with our ...... needs".

Some individuals made comments when replying to the satisfaction questionnaire these included:

" they are looking out for my safety and being nice and friendly"

" they listen to me well"

" provide excellent help are very caring and understanding"

" staff always on time, always helpful"

One professional commented: "they provide a personalised service which is responsive and flexible".