• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Eden Place Limited - 9 Manor Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

9 Manor Road, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 7RJ (01926) 313227

Provided and run by:
Edenplace Limited

All Inspections

23 July 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection on 23 July 2015. The provider was given 24 hours notice of the inspection so we could ensure people were present at the service.

Eden Place Limited - 9 Manor Road, is registered for up to three people offering accommodation for people who require nursing or personal care, for people with mental health needs. At the time of our inspection there were three people living at the service.

The three people living at Eden Place Limited - 9 Manor Road lived independently, however were supported by staff from Eden Place Mental Health Nursing Home with one to two hours care support each day. People accessed Eden Place Mental Health Nursing Home daily for support with medicine. Additional support was provided with people’s health needs, financial management, meals and with some social activities. The two services were situated within close proximity of each other.

A requirement of the service’s registration is that they have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. A registered manager was in post.

Support was provided that met people’s needs and there were enough staff to care for people safely. People’s health and social care needs were reviewed regularly, staff referred to other health professionals when needed, so people were supported to maintain their health and wellbeing. Risk assessments were completed and plans minimised risks associated with people’s care.

People told us they felt safe living at the service and accessed assistance from staff at Eden Place Mental Health Nursing Home if this was required. Staff knew how to safeguard people and what to do if they suspected abuse. People were protected from harm as medicines were stored securely and systems ensured people received their medicines as prescribed. Checks were carried out prior to staff starting work at the service to make sure they were of good character and ensure their suitability for employment.

Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLs). No one at the service lacked capacity or had a DoLs authorised.

Staff had training to do their jobs effectively, in order to meet people’s care and support needs. Staff were encouraged to continue to develop their skills in the area of health and social care. Staff told us they felt supported by the management team to carry out their roles effectively.

People’s nutritional needs were met and they either prepared meals independently or had meals at Eden Place Mental Health Nursing Home. People took part in some organised activities but chose to go out independently and pursue their own interests most of the time.

People told us they liked living at the service and that staff were kind and caring. People were cared for as individuals with their preferences and choices supported. Staff treated people with dignity and respect when supporting them and encouraged people to be independent. Relatives were encouraged to be involved in supporting their family members.

People were positive about the management team and the running of the service. The registered manager was responsive to people’s feedback in developing the service, and making continued improvements. Systems and checks were in place and these made sure the environment was safe for people that lived there and that people received the care and support they needed. People knew how to complain if they wished to and complaints were recorded and actioned in a timely way.

24 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one person who lived at 9 Manor Road about their experiences of the service. We also spoke with the member of staff on duty and the registered manager.

One person we spoke with told us that the care that was discussed with them matched the care that was provided to them. We found there were regular reviews of people's care. We saw people's independence was promoted within their care plans and on the day of our inspection.

We saw that the care plans were person centred and reflected people's individual needs. We found the member of staff supported people as detailed within their care plans. We noted they were compassionate and caring when supporting people.

We found the home was clean and there was a cleaning schedule which the member of staff followed. We found people living at 9 Manor Road were involved with keeping the home clean. We saw checks were made by the member of staff to review the cleanliness of the home.

We saw the provider ensured that the appropriate checks were undertaken before a new member of staff was employed. The manager told us about the induction plan which new staff had to complete during their employment by Eden Place Limited.

We found the service had systems in place to monitor the quality of service being provided.

27 November 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We reviewed the service's compliance with a number of essential standards in June 2012, as part of a planned inspection. This inspection was carried out to look at all the information we had received since we told the provider where they needed to improve.

We spoke with a person who lived at the home, who told us about their experiences of the service. We also spoke with the deputy manager and the manager.

One person living there who we spoke with, told us that there were regular meetings held and they felt involved within the home. They also told us that staff were friendly and supported their needs.

We saw quality assurance checks had been implemented and the manager told us how these worked. We saw that resident meetings were held and a resident survey was due to be undertaken.

26 June 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who lived at Eden Place Limited ' 9 Manor Road and we looked at two care plans. We also spoke to staff that supported people at 9 Manor Road and an affiliated location offered by the provider.

People we spoke with told us that the care they received matched the care that was discussed with them. People told us that they were involved in their care and had monthly discussions with the staff about their care plans. We saw that care plans were reviewed on a monthly basis and were signed by the people involved with the review.

People we spoke with told us that staff were friendly and supportive with their needs.

People we spoke with told us that felt safe within the home and knew who to speak to if they had any concerns. We saw that there was a complaint policy displayed within the home and emergency contact numbers were available.

We saw there was a safeguarding policy available for staff which needed to be updated. We saw that the registered manager had identified that the safeguarding and restraint policy was outdated. The registered manager was reviewing and updating the policies to ensure they were up to date.

Staff we spoke with told us about the training they had undertaken and the support they received. Staff told us that there was no formal supervision sessions and instead had supportive informal discussions. There was no training matrix available to identify where there were any gaps in staff training. We spoke with the registered manager who had identified the area of formal supervision and no training matrix as a concern.

We saw that the provider did not have a system to regularly seek the views of people using the service. We saw that there was no robust system to monitor the quality of service that people using the service receive. People who use the service, their representatives and staff were not asked for their views about their care and treatment. This meant that those views could not be acted upon.