• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Lewisham Indo-Chinese Community: Chinese Community School - 33 Clyde Street

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

33 Clyde Street, Deptford, London, SE8 5LW (020) 8692 2772

Provided and run by:
Lewisham Indo-Chinese Community: Chinese Community School

All Inspections

1 December 2017

During a routine inspection

Lewisham Indo-Chinese Community: Chinese Community School - 33 Clyde Street is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses in the community. It provides a service to older adults, younger disabled adults and children. At the time of the inspection, six people were using the service.

At the last inspection, the service was rated Good.

At this inspection, we found the service remained Good.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff sought people’s consent to care and treatment and provided their care in line with the legal requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

People continued to receive safe care and support. Staff were aware of the identified risks to people’s health and well-being and understood how to provide safe care. Staff followed appropriate safeguarding systems to ensure they protected people from the risk of abuse and neglect.

People were supported by a sufficient number of suitably skilled and experienced staff to meet their needs. People’s care was delivered by staff who received the support they required to be effective in their roles, which included regular supervisions, appraisals and training.

People received care in line with their assessed needs, current legislation and best practice guidance as recommended by health and social care professionals. The registered manager reviewed people’s needs and ensured staff had sufficient guidance to meet their changing needs.

People who required support to take their medicines were helped to do so safely by staff trained to carry out this duty. Staff knew how to minimise the risk of infection and had received the relevant training to guide their practice. The registered manager ensured staff learnt from incidents and near misses to help keep people safe.

People were supported to eat and drink healthily and to access healthcare services when needed. Staff worked closely with other health and social care professionals to ensure people received appropriate care in a timely and coordinated manner. The provider ensured people had access to the equipment they needed to enable them to receive effective care.

People received care provided in a compassionate and dignified manner. Staff respected people’s individuality and maintained their privacy and dignity. People were involved in planning their care and support and had access to advocacy services when needed. Staff ensured people had the information they required to make decisions about their care.

People were given opportunities to share their views about the service. The registered manager acted on people’s feedback to improve service delivery. People were confident of making a complaint and felt reassured that their concerns would be resolved.

The provider used their quality assurance systems effectively to monitor and improve care provision. The registered manager and staff understood the provider’s vision to provide person-centred care. Staff were valued at the service and spoke highly of the registered manager. People benefitted from the close working relationship between the provider and external agencies.

5 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This announced inspection took place on 5 November 2015. Lewisham Indo-Chinese Community: Community School provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of this inspection the service was providing support to 11 people in Lewisham.

Lewisham Indo-Chinese Community: Community School was last inspected on 29 May 2013. It met all the regulations inspected at that time.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were safe at the service. Staff knew how to identify and act on allegations of abuse and neglect. Risk assessments were carried out on people’s needs and their well-being. Staff had sufficient guidance to manage identified risks. People were supported to manage their medicines in a safe and timely manner.

People and their relatives were involved in planning their care and support. People were supported by staff who understood their health conditions and related risks. Staff had the relevant knowledge and skills to support people. Support plans were in place to guide staff on how to meet people’s needs. People were asked for their consent before they received care.

Staff supported people in line with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People received appropriate support to understand and make decisions relating to their care and support.

People and their relatives said the registered manager was approachable. The registered manager supported staff through regular supervision and appraisals meetings. Staff used feedback from these meetings to improve their practice. Staff received on-going training to meet people’s needs.

People were happy with the support and care they received. People’s language and cultural needs were met. People and their relatives had positive relationships with staff. Staff were respectful of people’s privacy and dignity. People were treated with kindness and respect.

People had access to healthcare services when needed. Staff followed healthcare professionals’ advice to support people with their nutrition. Staff supported people with their eating and drinking.

People were encouraged to provide feedback about the quality of care. The registered manager visited and made telephone calls to people regularly to check on the standard of support and care they received. The registered manager valued their views and used them to improve the service.

People knew how to raise a complaint. The registered manager had investigated and resolved complaints in line with the service’s complaints procedure. People and their relatives were satisfied with the outcome of the investigations.

People and their relatives made positive comments about the registered manager and the service. The service used the audit systems in place effectively to monitor the quality of the service and to understand people’s experiences of using the service.

29 May 2013

During a routine inspection

People using the service and their relatives told us their privacy and dignity were respected, and that their language and cultural needs were met. They said that they were consulted about their care, and that the service kept in regular contact. One relative told us "review visits are made regularly at home by either the supervisor or manager".

We reviewed some of the care records for people using the service. Each one contained an up to date care plan and a risk assessment. We saw that if carers had any concerns about a person using the service they were prompt in reporting this to their office.

Staff had undergone training in safeguarding and told us what action they would take if they were concerned about the safety of a person using the service. Relatives and people using the service told us that they felt safe with the carers. We also found that staff had attended a number of other training courses, including first aid, dementia care and medication.

We found that the provider had suitable systems in place to monitor the quality of the service that was being provided. These included sending out surveys to people using the service and their relatives, to ascertain if they were satisfied with the care being given. One person who used the service told us "they listen when I have concerns, and do something about them".

12 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People using the service and their relatives said the agency provided a good service. One person commented that she was always asked what she wanted, and the care workers respected her. A relative said 'the agency is so important because it is culturally sensitive, and meets the specific language needs of my mother'.

People using the service and relatives said the care workers understood the way people liked to receive care. One relative commented that the care workers knew her mother 'inside out'. Although people told us they were satisfied with the standard of care, there was other evidence that the provider could not be sure that all staff had received appropriate training before they started providing care.

8 December 2010 and 21 March 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

We spoke with the relatives of a number of people who used the service. They all said that carers always made visits and when occasionally they were unable to do so, a substitute carer was arranged. The relatives we spoke with were made aware of how to make a complaint or comment on the service. They were satisfied with the care their relatives were receiving and the care that was delivered had been tailored to individual people's preferences. Relatives also said that managers visited people who use the service several times a year to discuss the care being provided.