• Doctor
  • GP practice

The Surgery Chorley

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Ann James House 32-34, St. Thomas's Road, Chorley, PR7 1HR

Provided and run by:
Dr Gora Abubaker Bangi

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about The Surgery Chorley on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about The Surgery Chorley, you can give feedback on this service.

18 December 2023

During a routine inspection

We carried out unannounced inspections at The Surgery Chorley and the branch site at Leyland Surgery on 18 December 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

Safe – Requires Improvement

Effective - Good

Caring – Good (carried forward from previous inspection)

Responsive - Requires Improvement

Well-led - Good

The previous inspection was undertaken on 22 October 2022, when the practice was rated good in all key questions and good overall.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Surgery Chorley on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was carried out in response to concerns raised to CQC about issues including culture, staffing, workflow and access. We undertook an unannounced inspection and looked at the key questions; Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews.
  • Requesting written feedback from staff and patients.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • Inspection visits to both sites.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement because;

  • Systems to ensure medications remained safe to use were not always effective; we identified expired medications and equipment.
  • Emergency medications and equipment were not organised in a way to enable staff to access the items quickly in the event of a medical emergency.
  • At the time of inspection the practice had not adhered to their policy to keep prescription paper safely secured. There was a risk that such paper may have been misappropriated.
  • Maintaining staffing levels was a challenge.
  • Patients could not always access care and treatment easily and in a timely way.
  • Feedback from patients from a range of sources indicated that patients were dis-satisfied with access to the practice by telephone and found it challenging to secure an appointment.
  • The National GP patient survey painted a deteriorating picture.

We found one breach of regulation. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients

In addition, the provider should:

  • Improve staffing levels within the practice.
  • Implement initiatives to improve the workplace culture and staff retention;
  • Promote knowledge of freedom to speak up options.
  • Implement responses to improve patient surveys and feedback;
  • Take action to improve access to appointments;
  • Take action to improve access by telephone;
  • Consider the security implication of unsecured clinical rooms at both sites.
  • Take action to improve screening and immunisation uptake.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Healthcare

20 October 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at The Surgery Chorley on 20 October 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Good

This was the first inspection since the practice registered in November 2021.

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection to provide a rating of the service which was registered in November 2021.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing facilities as well as face to face
  • Requesting written feedback from staff and patients
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall.

We found that:

The practice was good in all key questions.

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
  • Staff were exceptionally motivated, proud and enthusiastic about their roles and the organisation.

We found an area of outstanding practice:

  • The systems of clinical staff support, training and development in place were comprehensive, innovative and inspiring.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Improve oversight and documentation around incident reporting.
  • Improve documentation and recording around Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders. In particular when mental capacity and best interest decisions are involved. A review process should also be considered.
  • Add details of the PHSO to the written complaint responses.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services