• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: George Rowley House

Thimbler Road, Canley, Coventry, West Midlands, CV4 8HG (024) 7678 5767

Provided and run by:
Coventry City Council

All Inspections

20 August 2013

During a routine inspection

George Rowley House provides housing with care. People live in their own flats and staff provide support at pre-arranged times. We visited the service on Tuesday 20 August 2013. There were 21 people using the service on the day of our visit. During our visit we spoke with seven people who used the service, a relative, the registered manager, and three care workers.

We found people had given their consent to the care and treatment to be provided. People we spoke with said they were happy with the care they received. One person said, 'All the staff are very good, they get to know you and you get to know them, it's like a big family I suppose'.

The care plans we looked at included people's preferences and choices. We saw that assessments and support plans were being reviewed and updated as needed. We found people received their care around the time they expected to. People we spoke with said that care workers were polite and caring.

We looked at the medication and recruitment procedures. We found there was a safe procedure for assisting people with medication. Records showed staff had been properly checked before they started working at George Rowley House. The procedures in place made sure people remained safe and well.

Records showed the agency had systems in place to monitor the service provided and for managing identified risks. People said they were happy with the care and support they received. One person told us, 'I've been here about a year, I am very satisfied. The staff are all lovely, they will do anything for you'.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

Following our inspection to George Rowley House on 23 January 2013 we asked the provider to make improvements to the record keeping in the agency. This was because records we viewed were not always accurate or up to date. We asked the provider to send us a report explaining what action they had taken to become compliant with this regulation.

The providers report told us they had made several improvements to how records were being managed.

A system for auditing people's files had been introduced and all files had been audited since the inspection.

Medication records had been audited following our visit. The process for auditing medication records had been revised to ensure all records were audited regularly. This meant any errors would be identified and addressed quickly.

The support plan documentation had been amended to include pressure area care. This would include any prevention of pressure area management including food and fluid intake. This would ensure people who were unable to mobilise independently and depended on staff for food and drink remained safe and well.

The report from the provider showed that appropriate action had been taken to ensure records were accurate and fit for purpose.

23 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited George Rowley House on Wednesday 23 January. No one knew we were visiting. People who used the service received varying levels of care and support. Some people received a high level of care while others only required a well being check.

People we spoke with said care staff treated them with respect and they had been involved in decisions made about their care. One person said 'They (the care staff) are all polite and friendly; they make sure I have everything I need before they go.'

People we spoke with said there was a consistent staff team that they knew well. All the people we spoke with said staff were responsive and flexible to their needs. We saw that staff recorded the things they had done and signed the times they arrived and left people's homes. We found there was sufficient staff to meet the needs of people living at George Rowley House.

Staff we spoke with knew how to recognise symptoms of abuse. The manager knew the procedure for referring safeguarding concerns to the local authority.

The agency had procedures in place for monitoring the service provided, including tenants meetings and satisfaction surveys. We asked people if they were satisfied with the service. One person told us 'I am very happy with the care I receive,' and another said, 'Yes. I am satisfied with everything.'

We found the record keeping in the agency was not always accurate and up to date. This could put people at risk of unsafe or inappropriate care and support.

31 August 2011

During a routine inspection

We visited the agency on Wednesday 31st August. We talked to six tenants living at George Rowley House and all the care staff on duty. We selected three tenants with different needs to pathway track. Pathway tracking enables us to look in detail at a persons care and support and to find out their experiences of using the service.

The files we sampled contained an assessment of need completed by a social worker, and a care plan and needs assessment completed by the agency. People told us they had folders in their flats which included written information about the service provided. People we spoke to said they were consulted about the care provided and had given their consent for the agency to provide the support required. People we spoke to said carers stayed long enough to do what is required without rushing.

People we spoke to said they were encouraged and supported to do things for themselves. One person said 'I can do most things for myself but staff help me when I have a bath, they always make sure I'm not left exposed'. People said that staff knock on the door before they enter their flat, one person said 'Staff never just walk in'. People told us that staff are always polite and treat them with respect they also said care staff are helpful and friendly. People said there was a small group of regular carers who they know well. One person told us 'All the staff are very good. I can't fault them'.

People can continue to manage their own medication if they can do this safely. Staff will assist people who are unable to take their medication themselves. There is a procedure in place for monitoring and auditing medication records however, the procedure for managing tablets in boxes should be improved so that this can be audited to make sure people receive medication as prescribed.

Staff we spoke with knew what they should do to keep people safe. Records we looked at showed that risks associated with the care of clients are assessed and reviewed. Manual handling assessments were in place and staff had completed moving and handling training. Care staff we spoke with gave a good account of how they monitored and managed pressure areas and what changes in the skin condition would prompt a referral to the district nurse. Falls prevention measures were in place and nutritional assessments had been completed although one of the assessments we looked at had not been updated when the tenants' needs had changed. Records show staff complete the training required to work with people safely.

People we spoke to said they were asked for their views and opinions of the service and had information about making complaints.