• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Tendring Meadows Care Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

The Heath, Tendring, Clacton On Sea, Essex, CO16 0BZ (01255) 870900

Provided and run by:
G.A. Projects Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

10 December 2014

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 10 December 2014 and was unannounced.

Tendring Meadows Care Home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 53 people who may be elderly, have a physical disability or be living with dementia. The service does not provide nursing care. At the time of our inspection there were 27 people who used the service.

A registered manager was in post at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last inspection of the service on 25 June 2014 there were no areas of concern in the standards we looked at.

At this inspection we found that improvements were required in the way the service was managed. While some aspects of good management were in place, the registered manager had not implemented other areas that were essential to good management. The manager had not complied with regulations in relation to notifying the Care Quality Commission of relevant incidents.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

The manager did not have good processes for auditing and managing accidents and incidents to learn from them and drive up the quality of the service. The process for managing risk needed to improve so that the risk of harm to people using the service was reduced.

People felt that the care and support they received was good and kept them safe. Processes were in place for supporting people to take their medicines safely.

People’s care needs were met by staff who were knowledgeable about how people preferred to be supported.

There were processes in place to support staff to develop the skills and knowledge they needed to fulfil their roles effectively and staff felt well supported.

People’s requirements around food and drink were met and they enjoyed the food.

Staff understood how to reduce people’s anxieties and provided care and support in ways that were kind and caring.

People were content with the lifestyle at the service and the way staff supported them to make choices about how they spent their time.

Staff and people at the service were positive about the open culture.

19 June 2014

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we spoke with three people who used the service. We talked with the registered manager, the deputy manager and three members of staff. The detailed evidence that supports our findings can be read in the full report.

Is the service safe?

Staff had received a range of training to protect people from harm. Safeguarding of vulnerable adults from abuse (SOVA), Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) training were completed every year. Staff we spoke with told us that they were aware of the action they would take if they suspected abuse was or had taken place. They were also aware of what it meant to deprive someone of their liberty. They were also aware of what it meant to deprive someone of their liberty and why this was sometimes necessary when a person did not have the capacity to make decisions for themselves. The staff had considered the person's capacity within the guidelines of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and (DoLS). Where there was potential for people to be deprived of their liberty in order to safeguard them from harm, appropriate referrals to the local safeguarding authority had been made. This ensured that people's best interests had been considered.

The policy, procedures and quality monitoring of the service included health and safety and reviews of care planning and delivery. This system was comprehensive and ensured people lived in a safe environment with safe care.

Is the service effective?

People were satisfied with the care and support they received. This was consistent with the positive feedback received from people as reported in the provider's own quality assurance survey. All of the staff we spoke with were knowledgeable about individual people's care needs, and this knowledge was consistent with the care plans in place.

Is the service caring?

People were supported by kind and attentive staff. We saw that staff showed patience and gave encouragement when supporting people. We spoke with three people who used the service. One person said to us, "I like it here." Another person said, "The staff are very helpful." We observed the care and attention people received from staff. All interactions we saw were appropriate, respectful and friendly and there was a relaxed and peaceful atmosphere throughout the home.

Is the service responsive?

We saw that care plans and risk assessments were informative, up to date and regularly reviewed. The registered manager responded in an open, thorough and timely manner to complaints. This meant that people could be assured that complaints were investigated and action was taken as necessary. Staff told us the manager was supportive and approachable and they would have no difficulty speaking to them if they had any concerns.

Is the service well led?

Staff said that they felt well supported by the manager and the deputy manager. There was a commitment from everyone to work together as a team. The provider had a range of quality monitoring systems in place to ensure that care was being delivered appropriately by staff.

23 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We gathered evidence of people's experiences of the service by talking with people living in the home and with visiting relatives. We observed how people spent their time and noted how they interacted with other people living in the home and with staff.

During our inspection we spoke with people who told us they liked living in Tendring Meadows. A relative told us their relative had settled in and they were happy with the standard of care. Another relative said: 'People are treated with respect and dignity.' We saw that people were comfortable with staff and others living in the home; the atmosphere was relaxed.

Relatives who completed surveys as part of the home's quality monitoring system were complimentary about the staff, the environment and the standard of care provided at Tendring Meadows. One relative stated: 'X is looked after so well' and another stated their relative was always busy which was what they preferred but they could rest when they wanted, it was their choice.

We saw that staff were knowledgeable about the needs of people living in the home, treated them with respect and provided care in ways that people preferred and that met their needs.

16 May 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit there were 25 people living in Tendring Meadows and throughout the day of our visit we spoke with six people about their care and the lifestyle in the home. We also gathered evidence of people's experiences of the service by observing how people spent their time and noting how they interacted with other people living in the home and with staff.

One person spoken with told us the home was, 'OK' and another said they thought the home was 'Excellent.'

A relative spoken with told us, 'Sometimes they seem short staffed; more so at the weekends.' A person living in the home said that sometimes staff seemed 'rushed' and they could do with 'an extra pair of hands'.

20 September 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our unannounced inspection on 20 September 2011 we had conversations of different lengths with four people living in the home. People were very complimentary about the staff and the care provided. One person told us 'The home is lovely. I can't find any faults at all, the staff are very caring. I've got a nice big room.' Another person said 'I'm quite content. I've got no complaints whatsoever. I like the food and they've got a good cleaner here.'

We carried out an additional inspection on 27 September 2011 due to concerns about medicines management. People we spoke with told us that they were happy that the home managed their medicines on their behalf. One person said that they were given their medicines "very regularly" and that "it works very well".

13 June 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

We carried out an unannounced visit to Tendring Meadows on 13 June and 15 June 2011. We had conversations of various lengths with seven people living in the home and with two relatives on 13 June and with five people in the home on 15 June. People and their relatives were very complimentary about the home. People told us that the care was good and that staff and the management team were very supportive. One person said 'I'm very happy here, you've only got to ask and staff do anything you want. I tell my family I wouldn't want to be anywhere else, I was lucky to come here. I've never had any concerns, there's nothing that could be better. The manager comes round to speak to us every day to find out if there's anything they can do for us.' Another person told us 'They do things in the way that I like, they're very helpful.' A relative told us 'The home is wonderful, X is happy here. Staff respond very well when we ask questions, everyone is lovely.'

People told us that there were activities, entertainments and occasional outings to local places of interest when the weather was fine. They were happy with the quality of the food and the choices available. People confirmed that they were offered an alternative if they did not like what was on the menu. One person described the food as 'Excellent' another said 'They've got a very good cook here.'