• Dentist
  • Dentist

Sidcup Dental Spa

85 Station Road, Sidcup, Kent, DA15 7DN (020) 8300 6363

Provided and run by:
Dr Iraj Almasi

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

3 August 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a follow up focused inspection of Sidcup Dental Spa on 3 August 2022. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who had access to a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Sidcup Dental Spa on 23 March 2022 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well led care and was in breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Sidcup Dental Spa dental practice on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When one or more of the five questions are not met, we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 23 March 2022.

Background

Sidcup Dental Spa is in Sidcup in the London borough of Bexley and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice for a fee.

The dental team includes the principal dentist, a dental nurse and a trainee dental nurse. The practice has two treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the dental nurse and the trainee dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Wednesday 9am to 6pm

Tuesday and Thursday 9am to 8pm

Friday and Saturday 9am to 1pm.

23 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced focused comprehensive inspection on 23 March 2022 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered practice was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions, however due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

  • The dental clinic appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained.
  • Safeguarding processes were in place and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The practice had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked as a team.
  • Improvements were required to information governance arrangements.
  • The practice had infection control procedures which broadly reflected published guidance. Improvements were required with regards to checks to sterilisation equipment.
  • Staff knew how to deal with medical emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available. Improvements were required with regards to staff training for medical emergencies
  • Improvements were required with regards to the systems in place to help the practice manage risks to patients and staff.

Background

Sidcup Dental Spa is in the London borough of Bexley and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces are available near the practice.

The dental team includes a principal dentist, a dental nurse and a trainee dental nurse. The practice has two treatment rooms.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the dental nurse and the trainee dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday and Wednesday 9.00am to 6.00pm

Tuesday and Thursday 9.00am to 8.00pm

Friday and Saturdays 9.00am to 1.00pm

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with:

Systems or processes must be established and operated effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements of the fundamental standards as set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the College of General Dentistry.

29 September 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 29 September 2015 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Background

Sidcup Dental Spa is located in the London Borough of Bexley and provides private dental services. The demographics of the practice is mixed, serving patients from a range of social and ethnic backgrounds. The practice is open Monday to Friday with a range of opening times including evening and Saturday by appointment. The practice facilities include two consultation rooms, reception and waiting area, decontamination room and a staff area. The premises were wheelchair accessible and had facilities for patients with mobility issues.

The staff structure of the practice is comprised of the principal dentist and a dental nurse. There is also a nurse who is used on a casual basis to cover.

The principal dentist is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as an individual. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

We received feedback from 14 patients through completed Care Quality Commission comment cards. Patients’ feedback was positive and they were happy with staff, the service they were provided and the physical environment of the practice.

Our key findings were:

  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned in line with current guidance.
  • Patients' were involved in their care and treatment planning so they could make informed decisions.
  • There were effective processes in place to reduce and minimise the risk and spread of infection, however improvements were required in relation to following published infection control guidance.
  • Staff had access to emergency drugs to enable the practice to respond to medical emergencies. Medical oxygen was also available and staff knew where the equipment was stored.
  • All clinical staff were up to date with their continuing professional development.
  • There was appropriate equipment for staff to undertake their duties, and equipment was maintained appropriately.
  • Appropriate governance arrangements were in place to facilitate the smooth running of the service.