• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Home Instead Senior Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 8, Aylesfield Farm Buildings, Froyle Road, Shalden, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 4BY (01420) 543214

Provided and run by:
Colvincare Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 27 February 2019

The inspection:

¿ We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

¿ The inspection was completed by two adult social care inspectors.

Service and service type:

¿ This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats and specialist housing. It provides care to both older and younger people.

¿ The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

¿ Not everyone using Home Instead Senior Care receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people being provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

Notice of inspection:

¿ We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection because it is small. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

¿ Inspection site visit activity started on 25 January 2019 with telephone calls to people who used the service and CAREGivers. It ended on 28 January 2019. We visited the office location on 28 January 2019 to speak with the registered manager and office staff; and to review care records and policies and procedures.

What we did:

¿ Prior to the inspection the provider sent us a Provider Information Return. Providers are required to send us information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections.

¿ We reviewed information we held about the service, for example, statutory notifications. A notification is information about important events which the provider is required to tell us about by law.

¿ We emailed six professionals to seek their feedback on the service. Following the inspection, we received feedback from two of them. They both provided positive feedback.

¿ Prior to the site visit we spoke with seven people and two CAREGivers.

¿ During the site visit we spoke to the registered manager, the nominated individual, a director of the company and a further four staff.

¿ We reviewed care plans, daily records, medicine records and rosters for five people.

¿ Following the inspection, we received written feedback on the service from another person and a relative.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 27 February 2019

About the service:

¿ Home Instead Senior Care is a domiciliary care agency, providing care to people living in East Hampshire and Midhurst.

¿ It provides personal care to people living in their own houses/flats.

¿ Home Instead Senior Care call their care staff, CAREGivers and this term is used throughout this report.

¿ The service was providing personal care to 20 older and younger people at the time of the inspection. Some of whom were living with dementia or a disability.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

People’s experience of using this service:

¿ People told us they received very high quality care from exceptionally dedicated and caring staff, which professionals confirmed. A staff member told us, “The clients come first with Home Instead.” People valued the hands-on approach of the provider who completed their initial assessment.

¿ The provider took great care to match people and CAREGivers and introduce them, prior to the first care call. CAREGivers had sufficient time to spend with people at each call, which enabled the provision of thoughtful, unrushed care.

¿ CAREGivers went the ‘extra mile’ for people in the provision of their care. They were sensitive to what was important to people and went out of their way to help them.

¿ People living with dementia derived great pleasure and benefit from the provider’s ‘Music and Memories’ café. CAREGivers supported people to go out into the community to pursue their interests.

¿ CAREGivers sensitively discussed with people their end of life wishes.

¿ People were involved in planning their care. Their care plans were individualised.

¿ People received safe and effective care from competent staff

¿ Staff worked closely with other professionals to ensure people received seamless care.

¿ The service was family run and well led. The provider was highly visible and involved with the service.

¿ The provider promoted people’s safety in the community.

¿ People’s consent to their care was sought. The registered manager was acting to ensure mental capacity act assessments were only completed for people where required and documented.

¿ The provider had acted and was taking further action to ensure medicines recording reflected best practice.

¿ We have made a recommendation about staff refreshing their formal safeguarding training.

Rating at last inspection:

¿ At the last inspection the service was rated Good (06 January 2017).

Why we inspected:

¿ This was a planned inspection to check that this service remained Good.

Follow up:

¿ We will follow up on the recommendation we have made at the next inspection.