• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Arlington House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

10 Tennis Road, Hove, Brighton, East Sussex, BN3 4LR (01273) 413222

Provided and run by:
Driss Zemouli and Ms Niki Clarke

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

1 June 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 1 June 2016. Arlington House is a care home without nursing that is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to 33 older people. The home is located close to Hove seafront and the building was converted from four terraced houses and has a stair lift, a conservatory and garden. At the time of the inspection there were 25 people living at the home and many of them were living with dementia, some people also had mental health problems.

The home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were not consistently supported with meaningful activities. Some people who were living with dementia had little to do to occupy their time, particularly in the morning when staff were busy. There were some organised activities and some people were supported to go out. However people told us they were bored and some people said they would like to go out more often or have more to do in the home.

People spoke highly of the staff and the care they received, one person said, “The staff are really super, the care is fantastic,” and a relative told us “The staff are all nice, but some are really special.” Staff knew the people they were caring for well and spoke about them knowledgeably. People appeared happy and relaxed in the company of staff and told us that they had confidence in them, one person said, “The staff are well trained, they understand my needs and they know exactly what they are doing, I have complete confidence in them.” Staff received regular supervision and their training was up to date. Staff told us they felt well supported within their roles.

People were protected from harm with robust risk assessments by staff who understood their responsibilities with regard to safeguarding procedures. There was an effective recruitment procedure in place to ensure the right sort of people were working in the home, and only staff who were trained and competent were able to give people their medicines. People received support to ensure they had enough to eat and drink and if they were identified as being at risk of malnutrition or dehydration suitable monitoring systems were used to maintain their health. Referrals were made to health care professionals in a timely way when required and people were supported with a range of health care services to maintain good health.

Staff understood the importance of obtaining people’s consent to care and treatment and where people lacked capacity staff acted in line with legislation and guidance to ensure decisions were made in people’s best interests. Staff showed a high regard for people’s dignity and privacy and treated them with respect, one staff member said, “We want people to feel comfortable in their home and they need to know we respect their privacy.” People told us they were included in decisions about their care and support, one person said “I was asked about what I like to do and what was important to me.” Records were personalised and gave a clear sense of the person. People’s preferences, wishes and views were recorded as well as their life history. We saw that staff were aware of this information and that they used it to provide person centred care to people.

People and their relatives told us that the registered manager was approachable and that they felt comfortable raising any concerns or complaints they had. The complaints log showed that issues were recorded and actions were taken to resolve any complaints, people said they felt confident that their concerns were listened to. Regular feedback was sought from people and relatives as well as from staff and professionals who visited the home. The registered manager used this information together with other quality monitoring to make improvements to the service.

People, relatives, staff and visiting professionals spoke highly of the registered manager, saying that the service was well led. One visiting professional said the registered manager was “Receptive to new ideas and very motivated to offer the best for the residents.” Staff described an open culture where practice was discussed and challenged and they received clear guidance and leadership from the registered manager.

10 October 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we spoke with four people who used the service. We also spoke with four staff members; these were the registered manager and three care workers.

The people we spoke with told us they were happy with the care they had received and with the staff team. One person who used the service told us 'I'm very happy here, I think this is the best place'.

We saw that the service had systems in place to gain and review consent to care and treatment from people who used the service. We also saw that people were provided with a choice of suitable and nutritious food and drink. One person who used the service told us 'The food is really good, it's excellent'.

During our inspection evidence was seen that appropriate pre-employment selection and suitable checking of staff had taken place. The service also had a system in place to effectively deal with comments and complaints.

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

Previous non-compliance had been found at the inspection carried out in November 2011 in respect to outcome 27: Notifications - notice in respect to absence (Regulation 14 of the Care Quality Commission (Registration) Regulations 2009).

At the inspection we carried out in November 2011, the registered manager at the time had been absent from the service since the beginning of July 2011. There had not been any arrangement made to adequately manage the home during this absence.

We reviewed this outcome in June 2013 and spoke with the current manager of the service. They had been employed as the interim manager at the service and had subsequently been registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as the registered manager of the service since March 2012.

25 January 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke with five people who used the service and with four staff members, these were the manager, the deputy manager and two care workers.

We also took information from other sources to help us understand the views of people who used the service, which included a satisfaction survey and meeting minutes.

The people we spoke with told us they were happy with the care they received and with the staff team.

One person who used the service told us 'I'm happy, they [the staff] are all good to me here'. Another person who used the service we spoke with told us 'Yes I like it here, the staff are always nice, I'm happy'.

Staff we spoke with knew the people living at the home well and had a good understanding of their support needs. One member of staff we spoke with told us 'We're positive here and we keep smiling. That's good for them [the people who used the service], as it makes them happy as well'.

1 November 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

People told us that they were satisfied with the level of care and support that they received. Everyone spoken with said that they were satisfied with the staff and the care and support that they provided. One person commented, 'The staff here are very kind and do a wonderful job'.

Some people did comment on the lack of activities available to them.

People told us that they were satisfied with the level of care and support that they received. Everyone spoken with said that they were satisfied with the staff and the care and support that they provided. One person commented, 'The staff here are very kind and do a wonderful job'.

Some people did comment on the lack of activities available to them.