• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Mencap - Liverpool, Knowsley and Lancashire Support Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Mencap - Essex House, Bridle Road, Bootle, Liverpool, Merseyside, L30 4UE (0151) 530 2150

Provided and run by:
Royal Mencap Society

All Inspections

22 December 2014

During a routine inspection

We undertook an announced inspection of Mencap - Liverpool, Knowsley and Lancashire Support Service on 22 December 2014. We informed the provider four days before our visit that we would be inspecting. We announced the inspection so the provider could check with people whether we could visit them in their homes and then organise those visits.

Mencap - Liverpool, Knowsley and Lancashire Support Service office is based in Bootle, Liverpool, Merseyside. The organisation provides personal care services to people with a learning disability who live in the community. At the time of our inspection the organisation was providing support to 62 people in 25 supported living accommodation schemes.

A registered manager was in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who used the service told us they felt safe and secure in the way they were supported by the staff. There were appropriate numbers of staff employed to provide a flexible service and to ensure people received the support at a time when they needed it.

Staff had completed adult safeguarding training. They were knowledgeable about adult abuse and clear about the arrangements for reporting any concerns they may have. They were aware of their organisation’s whistle blowing policy and said they would not hesitate to use it.

Rigorous recruitment processes were in place to ensure that staff were suitable to work with vulnerable people. Staff received regular training for their role and specific training in relation to people’s needs. Staff were up-to-date with their supervision and annual appraisal.

The consent of people was obtained before support was provided and staff worked in accordance with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (2005).

The assessments and support plans in place were personalised and provided detailed information about each person’s preferences, needs and aspirations. People were involved in reviewing their current support and making plans for future activities they wished to engage with.

Support was flexible and coordinated around people’s specific needs and preferences. Arrangements around meal preparation were primarily based on each individual’s food preferences and daily routines. We heard good examples about how people who shared a house were supported to plan their weekly shop and agree on a menu together.

Processes for routinely monitoring the quality of the service provision were established, including an annual survey and visits to the supported living schemes to check people were satisfied with their support arrangements.

13 December 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection to check if the service had made improvements to the way it stored personal confidential information.

We were provided with documentary evidence to demonstrate that the personal confidential information stored insecurely at the previous inspection had been removed to a secure storage area. In addition, staff had been reminded of the correct arrangements for safe storage of such information.

9 October 2013

During a routine inspection

On the day of the inspection we spoke with an area manager who facilitated our two visits to services in the community. We also spoke with staff and people who used the service. We had responses from external agencies including social services. This helped us to gain a balanced overview of what people experienced being supported by Mencap services.

One person we spoke with told us they liked the staff and were being supported in a way which suited them. We saw they were able communicate their wishes with staff members and these were clearly understood. They said they were happy living in the home and they felt safe and comfortable. They told us they enjoyed taking part in activities outside the home. Comments included, 'I go to the centre every week, where I have lots of friends'. Also, 'I've got everything I need here just look around my room'.

We looked at two houses within the scheme where people had tenancy agreements. We did this to see if the environment was suitable, safe and accessible to meet the needs of people being supported. In one service lack of storage facilities meant items were being stored in open communal landing areas which posed a health and safety risk to people. By storing some confidential information in this area meant it had the potential to breach confidentiality. The manager took immediate action following the inspection to address these issues.

The inspection included looking at records of how the service sought the views of people being supported, families and staff.

Staff members we spoke with had knowledge and understanding of peoples care needs and support plans. A staff member told us, 'We work closely with people and support plans are person centred and worked through with together.'

13 December 2012

During a routine inspection

We visited the homes of three people who were supported by staff from Essex House. The people we spoke with were positive about the support they received. One person said 'The staff are good and help me to go out'. Another person told us 'There is always someone to help me when I need help'. We spend time with a person who had limited verbal communication and observed that staff had a good understanding of the person's communication needs.

Effective arrangements were established for monitoring the safety and quality of the service. Clear arrangements for recruiting staff were in place and appropriate checks were carried out for each new member of staff. We spoke with staff who told us they did not start working with people who use the service until they had received the appropriate training. Staff had received adult safeguarding training as part of their induction and attended annual update training.