• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Caldicott House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

27 Old Bath Road, Leckampton, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL53 7QE (01242) 221343

Provided and run by:
Royal Mencap Society

All Inspections

2 October 2014

During a routine inspection

Caldicott House provides care and accommodation for up to six adults with learning disabilities. Four people were living at the home at the time of the inspection. This was an unannounced inspection, which meant the staff and provider did not know we would be visiting.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law, as does the provider.

People could be confident their care needs were being met and they were involved in the planning of their care. People were encouraged to be active and be part of their local community. They were encouraged to maintain relationships with friends and family and people that were important to them.

Care records described how the staff were meeting people’s their care needs. People had a health action plan that described what support they required. This was in a suitable format and included pictures to help people understand it.

People were protected from the risk of abuse because there were clear procedures in place to recognise and respond to abuse and staff had been trained in how to follow the procedures. Systems were in place to ensure people were safe including risk management, checks on the environment and safe recruitment processes.

Staff were caring and supportive and demonstrated a good understanding of their roles in supporting people. Staff received training and support that was relevant to their roles.

People were provided with a safe, effective, caring and responsive service that was well led. Staff were aware of the organisation’s values and philosophy in providing personalised care. There was a positive culture where people felt included and their views were sought. 

23 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We used a number of methods to understand the experiences of people using the service because some people had complex needs which meant they were not always able to tell us their experiences.

One person told us 'I am happy being here with all my friends'. They also said 'I'm not bored' and told us about the activities they did. We spoke to a relative who told us they were very happy with the level of activity their relative was undertaking and said they 'look well cared for'. The provider sought feedback from people and their relatives and acted on the responses. They undertook quality audits and followed up incidents to ensure continuous improvement.

People had support plans in place that detailed their needs and preferences. Staff were familiar with the plans. People were encouraged to be as independent as possible. Medicines were stored and administered safely. The recording was generally good although some practices needed reviewing. Controlled drugs were managed as required by per The Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001.

People had a choice of foods and were encouraged to eat healthily. One person told us the 'food is lovely here'. People's food and drink needs and preferences were documented and the risks of weight change or choking were well managed. The premises were generally well maintained and pleasant. Staff told us that maintenance by the landlord could be slow. We found that some of the bathrooms needed remedial work to allow effective cleaning.

19 December 2012

During a routine inspection

During our inspection, we regularly saw staff discussing options for care, activities and meals with the people living in the home. Records also reflected that people were involved in planning their care, activities and meals. We saw records relating to consent which were well laid out and clear.

We saw positive interactions between staff and people and could see that people felt comfortable with staff. One person said 'it's nice to live here'. Care plans were comprehensive and focused on the needs and preferences of those people living in the home. There was evidence that care plans were updated as changes occurred and learning was evidenced following feedback and incidents.

People told us they felt safe in the home and could raise concerns or comments if needed. All staff had safeguarding training and were familiar with local procedures. Staff training and support were well managed and one member of staff told us that 'you get a sense of achievement working here ' it's a good place to work'.

The quality of the service was being well reviewed and feedback was received from a range of sources. We could see that any issues identified were addressed appropriately.