• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Aspire Community Care & Support

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

263 High Street, London, E15 2LS (020) 7055 3880

Provided and run by:
Robelen Enterprises Ltd

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 10 March 2016

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

This inspection took place on 6, 7, 8 and 12 January and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service and we needed to be sure that someone would be in.

The inspection team consisted of a three inspectors and an expert-by-experience. An expert-by-experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service. This expert had experience of caring for someone using a domiciliary care service.

Before the inspection feedback was requested from the local authority commissioning team, the local Healthwatch and the local advocacy service. Before the inspection, the provider completed a Provider Information Return (PIR). This is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. We reviewed the information we already held about the service, including statutory notifications we had received.

During the inspection we spoke with six people who used the service and four relatives. We spoke with ten members of staff including the Registered Manager, the Care Manager, a coordinator and six care workers. We viewed 7 staff files including recruitment records, supervisions and appraisals. We viewed the care files of nine people who used the service including support plans, risk assessments, medicines records, needs assessments and records of care delivered. Various records and policies including the safeguarding policy, incidents, complaints, quality assurance, recruitment policy, training records, staff meeting minutes and feedback forms were viewed.

Overall inspection

Inadequate

Updated 10 March 2016

This inspection took place on 6, 7, 8 and 12 January 2015 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours' notice as they are a domiciliary care agency and we needed to be sure someone would be in. The service provides support to approximately 60 people living in their own homes.

The service had a Registered Manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service was last inspected in March 2014 when it was found to be compliant with the outcomes inspected.

People gave us mixed feedback about the service. People told us their regular carers were good and caring, but found that the service was not good when their regular carers were not available.

Care files were of a poor quality, they were task focussed and contained limited personalised information.

Risk assessments were insufficient. They were not robust and did not provide staff with the information they needed to reduce the risk of harm to people.

Where the service supported people with their medicines this was done by trained staff. However, associated medicines plans and records were poorly completed and people were at risk of not having their medicines administered as prescribed.

Where the service supported people with eating and drinking the information contained in their plans was insufficient and did not include information on specialist diets or how people liked to be supported.

Staff recruitment procedures were not robust and people were at risk of being supported by staff who were not suitable to work in a care environment. The service had not taken appropriate steps to ensure that staff were suitable to work with people in their homes.

Systems to monitor the quality of the service were not effective. The service did not consistently learn from complaints or incidents or use these to drive improvements to the service. The management and leadership of the service were not effective. We have made a recommendation about learning from incidents, accidents and complaints.

People felt safe and the service had safeguarding policies and procedures which were understood by staff. People had given their consent to their care and were involved in reviewing their care packages regularly.

People felt they were treated with dignity and respect. The service attempted to provide care workers who spoke the same language as people who used the service.

Staff received sufficient training and support to ensure they were suitably qualified to carry out their roles.

We found four breaches of regulations. You can see what action we have taken at the end of the report.

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘Special measures’.

Services in special measures will be kept under review and, if we have not taken immediate action to propose to cancel the provider’s registration of the service, will be

inspected again within six months.

The expectation is that providers found to have been providing inadequate care should have made significant improvements within this timeframe.

If not enough improvement is made within this timeframe so that there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures to begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration within six months if they do not improve.

This service will continue to be kept under review and, if needed, could be escalated to urgent enforcement action. Where necessary, another inspection will be conducted within a further six months, and if there is not enough improvement so there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall, we will take action to prevent the provider from operating this service. This will lead to cancelling their registration or to varying the terms of their registration.

For adult social care services the maximum time for being in special measures will usually be no more than 12 months. If the service has demonstrated improvements

when we inspect it and it is no longer rated as inadequate for any of the five key questions it will no longer be in special measures.