• Doctor
  • GP practice

Cleggs Lane Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

129-131 Cleggs Lane, Little Hulton, Manchester, M38 9RS (0161) 799 4001

Provided and run by:
Cleggs Lane Medical Practice Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Cleggs Lane Medical Practice on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Cleggs Lane Medical Practice, you can give feedback on this service.

25 January 2024

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced assessment of Cleggs Lane Medical Practice on 25 January 2024. The assessment focused on the responsive key question.

Following our previous inspection on 29 September 2022 the practice was rated good overall and for all key questions. The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Cleggs Lane Medical Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

The practice continues to be rated as good overall.

Safe – not inspected

Effective - not inspected

Caring - not inspected

Responsive - Good

Well-led - not inspected

Why we carried out this review

We carried out this assessment as part of our work to understand how practices are working to try to meet demand for access and to better understand the experiences of people who use services and providers.

We recognise the work that GP practices have been engaged in to continue to provide safe, quality care to the people they serve. We know colleagues are doing this while demand for general practice remains exceptionally high, with more appointments being provided than ever. In this challenging context, access to general practice remains a concern for people. Our strategy makes a commitment to deliver regulation driven by people’s needs and experiences of care. These assessments of the responsive key question include looking at what practices are doing innovatively to improve patient access to primary care and sharing this information to drive improvement.

How we carried out the review

This assessment was carried out remotely. It did not include a site visit.

The process included:

  • Conducting an interview with the provider and members of staff using video conferencing.
  • Reviewing patient feedback from a range of sources
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • Reviewing data we hold about the service
  • Seeking information/feedback from relevant stakeholders

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way and the provider had implemented systems and processes as a result of patient feedback.
  • National GP patient survey results relating to access were mostly above national averages.
  • Complaints were handled in a timely manner.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Follow their complaints policy to ensure responses have a meaningful apology where it is due and signposting the complainant to next steps including details of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

29 September 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Cleggs Lane Medical Practice on 28 and 29 September. Overall, the practice is rated as good.

The ratings for each key question are:

Safe - good

Effective - good

Caring - good

Responsive - good

Well-led - good

Why we carried out this inspection

This inspection was a comprehensive inspection of all five key questions as part of our routine inspection programme.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall.

We rated the provider as good for providing safe services.

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.

We rated the provider as good for providing effective services.

  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.

We rated the provider as good for providing caring services.

  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.

We rated the provider as good for providing responsive services.

  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way

We rated the provider as good for providing well led services.

  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Put in place a robust process for monitoring high risk drugs and managing historical safety alerts to reduce potential risk to patients.
  • Record all safety incidents and near misses.
  • Formalise support for non-medical prescribers.
  • Log and monitor complaints to assess trends and add complaints to the practice meeting agenda so learning can be shared formally.
  • Put in place a system to summarise the low risk patient note backlog.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services