• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

SCA Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1-3 Paynes Road, Southampton, SO15 3DL (023) 8036 6663

Provided and run by:
SCA Care

Assessment report published 12 September 2025

On this page

Safe

Good

8 September 2025

Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Learning culture

Score: 3

The service had a proactive and positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Management listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. Lessons were learnt to continually identify and embed good practice. Staff told us they were encouraged and felt supported to raise any concerns and would proactively try to identify risks to people’s safety. Staff understood the importance of reporting and recording and told us there was a culture of transparency and openness. There was an ethos across the organisation to learn from when things went wrong and how the provider could prevent repeat occurrences of accidents, incidents and other concerns.

Safe systems, pathways and transitions

Score: 3

The service worked with people and healthcare partners to establish and maintain safe systems of care, in which safety was managed or monitored. They made sure there was continuity of care, including when people required support from external agencies. Everyone we spoke with was positive about their experience. The provider worked in partnership with commissioners and hospital teams to support the safe discharge of people to their own home with a package of support and also to avoid hospital admission. The provider said, “We have excellent relationships with external professionals, and we are very proud of that".

Safeguarding

Score: 3

The service worked with people and healthcare partners to understand what being safe meant to them and the best way to achieve that. They concentrated on improving people’s lives while protecting their right to live in safety, free from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm and neglect. The service shared concerns quickly and appropriately and with the relevant agencies. One person said, “I feel safe, they look after me well.” Any safeguarding risks were clearly documented in people’s care records and prompt action was taken by the provider to reduce risks and to keep people safe. A member of staff commented, “My understanding of safeguarding is that it involves protecting vulnerable people, including both children and adults, from abuse, harm, or neglect. It also includes promoting their health, wellbeing, and human rights so they can live safely and with dignity.” Staff received appropriate training in understanding, reporting and investigating abuse.

Involving people to manage risks

Score: 3

The service worked with people and their families to understand and manage risks by thinking holistically. They provided care to meet people’s needs that was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things that mattered to them. People were involved in their care planning and managing any risks. A relative told us they were confident staff knew how to care for their family member. We saw people and relatives had been involved in developing risk assessments and care plans. A relative told us regular care reviews were held. People’s care plans were written in consultation with them. The management team recorded and monitored risks through their quality assurance process. People’s risks were reviewed and updated in their care plans and risk assessments as people's needs changed. Changes in care delivery took place as a result medication reviews, mobility reviews, nutritional reviews and feedback from people and relatives.

Safe environments

Score: 3

The service detected and controlled potential risks in the care environment. They made sure equipment, facilities and technology supported the delivery of safe care. Environmental risks were considered by the management team for all properties staff worked in as part of their initial assessment. Staff ensured equipment used in people’s own homes was safe. Regular checks were made on moving and handling equipment and health related equipment to ensure they could be safely used. Any concerns with equipment were reported to the management team or appropriate person for further action.

Safe and effective staffing

Score: 3

The service made sure there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received effective support, supervision and development. They worked together well to provide safe care that met people’s individual needs. The provider conducted effective pre-employment checks prior to an applicant commencing their employment. An induction was completed by all new staff members. Staff received regular training in line with their job role and staff were provided with additional information via staff meetings and supervision. Staff received regular support and supervision. A member of staff commented, “At SCA, staff training is taken very seriously; and rightly so. We firmly believe that well-trained staff make better carer's and support workers. As I often tell my team, training not only equips them with the skills and knowledge to deliver the best quality care, but it also gives them the confidence to handle difficult situations effectively and compassionately".

Infection prevention and control

Score: 3

The service assessed and managed the risk of infection. They detected and controlled the risk of it spreading and shared concerns with appropriate agencies promptly. People and their relatives confirmed staff had access to and used personal protective equipment (PPE) when required. The provider was effective in assessing and managing the risk of infection and followed local and national guidance to ensure people and staff were protected as much as possible. Staff were aware of good hygiene protocols, and we saw examples in care plans of how certain equipment should be cleaned and stored. Staff had received training in food hygiene and infection control.

Medicines optimisation

Score: 3

The service made sure that medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences. They involved people in planning, including when changes happened. People received their medicines as prescribed and they spoke positively about the support they received with medicines management. Staff told us they felt well trained and confident to support people to receive their medicines safely. Staff received medication training, and their competency was checked to ensure they understood the requirements for the safe administration of medicines. The staff team were proactive at reporting any changes to people’s medicines promptly. Body charts were used to identify where topical creams (treatment of medical conditions) should be applied.