• Care Home
  • Care home

Dent House Nursing Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

30 Chesterfield Road, Matlock, Derbyshire, DE4 3DQ (01629) 584172

Provided and run by:
Caritas Services Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 6 to 20 August 2026. Dent House Nursing Home is a residential service providing support to adults of all ages living with learning disabilities and autistic people, sensory impairments, mental health conditions including dementia and who had nursing needs.

This assessment was carried out due to the age of the current rating. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service had not originally been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. People with learning disabilities and autistic people using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. However, people were given choices and their independence and participation within the local community was being encouraged.

There was a good learning culture and people confirmed they could raise any concerns. Managers investigated any incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks well. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff took account of people’s individual communication, personal and healthcare needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved relatives, representatives, and others important to people in making best interest decisions when people did not have the capacity to make those decisions themselves.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information in a way people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the registered manager took it seriously and acted on it. The service worked in partnership to eliminate discrimination ensuring people received fair and equal care and treatment. Staff worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. People with protected characteristics felt supported. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas and innovation.

25 January 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Dent House is a residential care home providing accommodation for up to ten people over three floors and people have shared access to communal rooms and bathrooms. At the time of the inspection the home had nine people living there. Most people had lived there for some time and included people living with learning disabilities and physical disabilities.

16 November 2018

During a routine inspection

We inspected the service on 16 November 2018. The inspection was unannounced. Dent House is a registered care home. People in care homes receive accommodation and personal care as a package of care under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided and both were looked at during this inspection. Dent House accommodates up to ten people.

The home provides accommodation over two floors and people have shared access to communal rooms and bathrooms. At the time of the inspection the home was fully occupied. Most people had lived there for some time and included people living with learning disabilities and physical disabilities.

The care service had not originally been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. However, people were given choices and their independence and participation within the local community was being encouraged.

At our last inspection we rated the service good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and on-going monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

There was a registered manager in post who was there at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People continued to receive care that made them feel safe and staff understood how to protect people from abuse and harm. Risks to people were assessed and guidance about how to manage these was available for staff to refer to and follow. All staff were clear about action they would take. Recruitment of staff was carried out to ensure that adequate numbers of suitable staff were available to support people. People received medicines as they were required.

People continued to receive effective support from staff who had a sufficient level of skills and knowledge to meet their specific needs. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported people in the least restrictive way possible, whilst involving them as much as possible to make decisions. The policies and systems in the home supported this practice.

People continued to be cared for by staff who displayed kindness and compassion in ways that upheld their privacy and dignity. Staff ensured that people were supported to make choices and maintain a good level of independence in line with their abilities and wishes. People’s diverse needs were recognised and support and access to activities was supported and enabled by staff.

The provider had effective systems in place that were used to regularly review people’s care and support that had been provided. Care plans and detailed assessments were individual and contained a wealth of information about people, their needs, their wishes and cultural needs.

People using the service were well known by staff and the staff team continued to work consistently to ensure that support provided respected their needs. People’s own communications methods were well known and understood by staff who were keen to advocate on behalf of people whenever they were unhappy, wanted to make preferences known, or wanted to raise an issue.

The care home continued to be well-led, with checks and monitoring arrangements used to maintain the quality of the service provided. Staff were positive about the leadership and skills of the registered manager and people using the service had a good relationship with the registered manager too. Required information was available in the home and made available when requested.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

04/12/2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 04 December 2015, and it was unannounced.

Dent House provides accommodation and support for up to 10 people who have a learning disability. At the time of this inspection there were 10 people living at the home.

The service did not have a registered manager in post. The home is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of the inspection the manager had applied for registration with the Care Quality Commission.

People were safe and the provider had effective systems in place to safeguard people. Their medicines were administered safely and they were supported to access other healthcare professionals to maintain their health and well-being. They were given a choice of nutritious food and drink throughout the day and were supported to maintain their interests and hobbies. The provider had a complaints policy in place.

There were sufficient, skilled staff to support people at all times and there were thorough recruitment processes in place. Staff were well trained and used their training effectively to support people. The staff understood and complied with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the associated Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

People were cared for in a manner that promoted their dignity and independence. Where possible they were consulted on all aspects of their care delivery. This included ensuring staff had their consent before delivering care.

People or their relatives were included in drawing up their plans of care. The care plans were clearly set out giving directions to staff on how to ensure people had they care they wanted.

Care was designed to respond to people’s needs and wishes. There was a complaints process in place and people knew how to use it.

The manager ensured the service was run and developed around the needs and wishes of people. Staff were encouraged to contribute to the development of the service and understood the provider’s visions and values. The manager had applied to CQC for registration.

There was an effective quality assurance system in place.

This inspection took place on 04 December 2015, and it was unannounced.

Dent House provides accommodation and support for up to 10 people who have a learning disability. At the time of this inspection there were 10 people living at the home.

The service did not have a registered manager in post. The home is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. At the time of the inspection the manager had applied for registration with the Care Quality Commission.

People were safe and the provider had effective systems in place to safeguard people. Their medicines were administered safely and they were supported to access other healthcare professionals to maintain their health and well-being. They were given a choice of nutritious food and drink throughout the day and were supported to maintain their interests and hobbies. The provider had a complaints policy in place.

There were sufficient, skilled staff to support people at all times and there were thorough recruitment processes in place. Staff were well trained and used their training effectively to support people. The staff understood and complied with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the associated Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

People were cared for in a manner that promoted their dignity and independence. Where possible they were consulted on all aspects of their care delivery. This included ensuring staff had their consent before delivering care.

People or their relatives were included in drawing up their plans of care. The care plans were clearly set out giving directions to staff on how to ensure people had they care they wanted.

Care was designed to respond to people’s needs and wishes. There was a complaints process in place and people knew how to use it.

The manager ensured the service was run and developed around the needs and wishes of people. Staff were encouraged to contribute to the development of the service and understood the provider’s visions and values. The manager had applied to CQC for registration.

There was an effective quality assurance system in place.

14, 17 February 2014

During a routine inspection

We found at our inspection on 15 July 2013 that improvements were required to ensure people were fully protected from abuse or neglect. We also found that systems for assessing and monitoring the quality of care at the home, and to protect people from risk, were not fully effective.

At our inspections on 13 and 17 February 2014 we found the registered manager had moved to another home and a new manager had been employed at Dent House. The new manager told us they were applying for registration with the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

We spoke with the manager and deputy manager, people receiving care and staff at the home. People living at the home told us they felt safe and had no concerns about the way they were cared for. We found that systems to ensure people were protected were improved.

We found the provider had introduced new systems to ensure health and safety, incidents, staff training and complaints and concerns were monitored and action taken where required. This helped to ensure people were protected from unsafe or inappropriate care at Dent House.

15 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We found that people's needs were assessed and planning for their care was generally adequate at Dent House.

We saw that suitable and safe equipment was provided to promote people's independence and comfort at the home.

Staff received training in safeguarding people at the home from abuse. We found that they were aware of procedures for protecting people from abuse and reporting any concerns. The provider had not, however, made suitable arrangements to ensure that people with behaviours described as "challenging" who needed to be restrained to keep them safe were fully protected from abuse.

We found that there were inadequate systems in place to assess and monitor the care people received and fully manage risks.

15 November 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three people living at Dent House who said that they were happy there. One person said, 'I do a lot of different things here. The staff are really good.'

We examined care files, and found that consent was being obtained for people's care. We saw that care plans were detailed and personalised. Risks were also assessed and managed, and people had positive behaviour support strategies to help them if they felt anxious, angry or upset.

We looked at medication systems at Dent House, and saw that medicines were stored and administered safely.

We found that staff were trained to provide appropriate support for people, and that this included specialist training to meet people's particular needs.

We saw that Dent House made their complaints procedure available to anyone connected with the service, and that concerns and complaints were correctly recorded and responded to.

13 January 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who told us that they enjoyed living at the home. One person told us 'I like Dent House, I want to stay here', another said 'It's good here, the food is lovely'.

We also spoke with the relative of someone living at the home who told described the home as 'warm, friendly and homely'. They told us that they were 'absolutely delighted' with the care received by their relative. We observed that staff were aware of people's individual needs and knew how to best to communicate with and support people make choices for themselves regarding their daily routines.