• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Freeman House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Radburn Way, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, SG6 2LH (01462) 488000

Provided and run by:
Quantum Care Limited

All Inspections

19 May 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out on 19 May 2015 and was unannounced.

Freeman House provides accommodation and personal care for up to 48 older people. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

When we last inspected the service on 4 July 2013 we found them to be meeting the required standards. At this inspection we found that they had continued to meet the standards. However, there were areas which required improvement.

The provision of activities in the home required a review to ensure they were meeting everyone’s individual needs. Communication in the home, in particular between staff, people and their relatives required improvement.

The home is merging with another Quantum Care home in September at a new building. Plans were in place to ease transition and ensure people living at the home, their relatives and staff were kept informed of the progress and involved in the process.

Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. DoLS are put in place to protect people where they do not have capacity to make decisions and where it is considered necessary to restrict their freedom in some way, usually to protect themselves or others. At the time of the inspection applications had been made to the local authority in relation to people who lived at the service and were pending an outcome. Staff were fully aware of their role in relation to MCA and DoLS and how people were at risk of being deprived of their liberty.

People had their individual needs met. Staff knew people well and provided support in a timely manner. There was sufficient food and drink available and people were assisted to eat and drink where needed.

People had regular access to visiting health and social care professionals. Staff responded to people’s changing health needs and sought the appropriate guidance or care by healthcare professionals. Medicines were managed safely to ensure people received them in accordance with their needs.

Staff were clear on how to identify and report any concerns relating to a person’s safety and welfare. The manager responded to all concerns or complaints appropriately when they were made aware of them.

Staff were recruited through a robust procedure and provided with regular training to ensure their knowledge was up to date. Staff were clear on what their role. People and staff were positive about the manager and their leadership.

4 July 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We did not speak to people who use the service during this inspection. We returned to check that the home were compliant with medicines management.

At our previous inspection on 21 May 2013, we found that the recording chart did not accurately reflect the administration of medicine. This put people at risk of not having their medicine as prescribed. We found at this inspection on 04 June 2013 that the administration records were in good order.

21 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with a number of people who lived at Freeman House, and to a visiting relative. People told us they were happy with the service being provided. One person said, 'It's very nice here. Everyone's very friendly and we're looked after well.' Relatives told us, I take my hat off to them, they [staff] do a fantastic job.'

On the day of our inspection, the atmosphere was a very relaxed, and there was lots of laughter and gentle banter between staff and the people using the service. Staff treated people with respect and supported them to remain as independent as possible.

Care records were personalised and gave staff clear guidance on how to meet each person's individual needs. Potential risks to people had been assessed and plans had been put in place to minimise the risks.

The provider had a recruitment procedure in place to ensure that staff employed were suitable to work at the home.

People told us they knew how to complain, but had never had to.

Medication procedures need to be improved to ensure people were not being put at risk of receiving too much medication.

15 May 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke to at the home were generally very positive about it. They told us "There is nothing wrong with the place" and "I am well satisfied with the place...The staff are great", "you can do as you like...staff are great and you can have a laugh with them, they are all nice". People spoke well of the food served "food is very good and plenty of it...There are usually 2 or 3 choices".

People told us they got up when they chose and went to bed when they chose. They also told us they like the activities and outing which are arranged for them.