• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Swan Bank

2 Swan Bank, Penn, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV4 5QE (01902) 557995

Provided and run by:
City of Wolverhampton Council

All Inspections

23 April 2013

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we spoke with one person, two relatives, four members of staff and the manager. Where people were unable to speak with us, we carried out observation of the care they received.

We found that people were supported in making day to day decisions about the care they received. One relative said, 'They always ask what he wants to eat. They try to accommodate him'. People's values and diversity were respected and promoted.

The care people received was reflected in their care plans. People's needs were regularly reviewed and care delivered in line with any changes.

The home provided a pleasant environment for people to stay in. We saw that a number of safety audits were carried out to ensure people's safety

We found that staff were recruited in a safe way and correct checks were carried out to ensure their suitability to care for people. One relative told us, 'Staff are always welcoming. I have no cause for concern with them'.

People's care records were appropriately updated to reflect people's changing care needs. The manager carried out audits of care records to ensure the quality of the service delivered to people.

17 January 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our inspection we spoke with one person, three members of staff and the manager. We looked at six people's care records.

The person we spoke with responded positively when asked about their experience of the home. We also observed staff interacting with this person as they were not able to provide detailed feedback regarding their care, due to their communication needs. These interactions were positive and supportive.

Arrangements were in place to ensure that people were protected from harm. We found improvement in procedures surrounding people's money records. There were improved practices for safeguarding people.

A system had been put in place to identify mandatory training and gaps in training. We found that staff were receiving supervisions, but had not received recent annual appraisals.

We found systems in place to identify and record incidents, although actions arising from these were not always recorded in people's care plans. The manager was carrying out audit work to ensure the quality of the service delivered to people. We found improvements in some care records.

17 July 2012

During a routine inspection

We carried out this review to check on the care and welfare of people using the service. The home had one person using the service on the day of the visit. We spoke to one person, two staff, and the community resource manager.

There was a pleasant and friendly atmosphere in the home. The person wore clothing that reflected individual choice and preference. We saw that staff positively engaged with the person and promoted their independence by encouraging them to make choices throughout the day.

We found that arrangements were not in place to ensure that any allegation of abuse was reported to the local authority for investigation and to us. Systems were not in place to ensure that people and their finances were appropriately safeguarded.

There was enough staff to meet the needs and requirements of the person using the service. However, opportunities for staff to receive regular training that would enable them to improve the way they took care of people's care needs were limited.

Systems in place did not ensure that shortfalls in the home were identified to make improvements in the way that the service was run.

We saw that records were inconsistent and inaccurate. People's care records were not reviewed regularly to reflect changes. This meant that there is a risk that staff may not be appropriately providing care for people.