• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 1, Rural Enterprise Centre, Eco Park Road, Ludlow, Shropshire, SY8 1FF (01584) 838420

Provided and run by:
Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited, you can give feedback on this service.

8 February 2018

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 8 February 2018 was announced.

Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to older adults in Ludlow and the surrounding areas. At the time of our inspection the provider was providing personal care and other support for 31 people. Not everyone using Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with 'personal care'; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection, the service was providing personal care for 24 people.

At the last inspection on12 November 2015, the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found evidence continued to support the overall rating of Good. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

Medication administration continued to be safe. However, medicine administration records were not always accurate and details of when prescribed creams were applied were not always recorded by staff.

People continued to receive care, which protected them from avoidable harm and abuse. Staff responded to and met people's needs safely. Risks to people’s safety were identified and measures were in place to help reduce these risks. Staff continued to be recruited safely by the provider, and checks were completed on new staff to make sure they were suitable to support people in their own homes. There were sufficient numbers of staff to support people effectively. Staff received guidance and training on infection control and prevention and were provided with personal protective equipment (PPE).

People continued to receive care that was effective in meeting their needs. Staff received training to give them the skills and knowledge they needed to meet people's needs. People's rights with regards to consent and making their own decisions continued to be respected by staff. Systems were in place to help people maintain good health and have enough to eat and drink.

People were supported by staff who knew them well and had caring relationships with them. People felt involved in their own care and staff and managers listened to what they wanted. Staff respected people's privacy and dignity when they supported them and promoted their independence.

People continued to receive care and support that was individual to them. Support needs were kept under review and people were consulted about whether changes were required. People were encouraged to raise concerns and make complaints and were confident these would be dealt with. The provider was an inclusive service and promoted equality, diversity and human rights with people and staff.

People were listened to when they gave feedback about the service they received. Staff were happy in their work and were clear about their roles and responsibilities. There was an open culture within the service in which staff felt confident approaching management about any issues. Systems were in place that continued to be effective in assessing and monitoring the quality of the service provided.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

12 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 12 November 2015 and was announced.

Care at Home (Shropshire) Limited is a care service registered to provide personal care and support for people in their own homes in Ludlow and the surrounding areas. At the time of our inspection they were providing care and support for 34 people.

There is a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were protected from harm and abuse because they were supported by staff who knew how to recognise and respond appropriately to risks of harm or potential abuse. Staff did not start work until appropriate checks had been made to make sure they were suitable to support people in their homes.

People were involved in the planning of their care and in the reviews. The provider encouraged people to raise any issues and people were confident that action would be taken by the management team to resolve any issues.

People were encouraged to maintain their independence and staff supported this. Staff provided care which was kind, compassionate and promoted people’s privacy and dignity. Staff had developed positive working relationships with the people they supported. People were encouraged to make their own choices and decisions and felt listened to and respected.

Staff received induction and ongoing training in order for them to provide care. Staff were supported by the management team and received regular feedback on their performance.

People knew how to make a complaint if they needed, The provider completed regular quality checks to ensure standards of care were maintained. People’s views were sought on a regular basis and any areas for improvement were identified and acted upon. People were aware of who the management team were and felt they were approachable and listened to them. People’s views were sought about the quality of the service.