• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Community Options Limited - 2a Fielding Lane

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2A Fielding Lane, Bromley, Kent, BR2 9FL (020) 8313 9725

Provided and run by:
Community Options

All Inspections

27 April 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection was carried out on 27 April 2015 and was announced. At our last inspection on 4 November 2013, we found the provider was meeting the regulations in relation to outcomes we inspected.

Community Options Limited - 2a Fielding Lane provides support to people with mental health problems living in the community. At the time of our inspection the service was providing support to approximately 100 people.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was still working at the service but planned to relinquish this role. A new manager had been appointed by the provider and was managing the service at the time of this inspection. They had applied to the Care Quality Commission to become the registered manager for the service.

People said they felt safe and staff treated them well. Appropriate recruitment checks took place before staff started work. Safeguarding adult’s procedures were robust and staff understood how to safeguard the people they supported from abuse. There was a whistle-blowing procedure available and staff said they would use it if they needed to. People had access to health care professionals when they needed them and were supported to take their medicines as prescribed by health care professionals.

Staff had completed training specific to the needs of people using the service and they received regular supervision. The manager had a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People’s independence was promoted and they were encouraged to buy their own food and cook for themselves. Where appropriate peoples care files included assessments relating to their dietary support needs.

Assessments were undertaken to identify people’s support needs before they started using the service. People had been consulted about their care and support needs. Support plans and risk assessments provided clear information and guidance for staff on how to support people to meet their needs. People were aware of the complaints procedure and said they were confident their complaints would be listened to, investigated and action taken if necessary.

The provider sought the views of people using the service through surveys. They recognised the importance of monitoring the quality of the service provided to people. Staff said they enjoyed working at the service and they received good support from the manager. They said there was an out of hours on call system in operation that ensured management support and advice was always available when they needed it.

4 November 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with said they were very happy with the care and support they received. People said that they were provided with information to help them make informed decisions about their support. They said they were involved in their care planning and could contribute to their support plan. They told us that the staff were respectful and were almost always on time in attending their home.

All the people we spoke with told us that they were always treated in a respectful manner. One person said: 'the staff are very good, (and) very supportive of my needs.' Another person we spoke with said: 'they call and let me know if they are running late' and that they were informed if there were any staff changes.

At our inspection we found that people received suitable information about the care and support and were involved in their care planning. Staff understood how to keep people safe and were aware of their responsibilities for reporting concerns if required. The provider adhered to correct staff recruitment practices and records were stored securely.

30 November 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with said that staff who visited them were kind and helped them with their care needs. They respected their privacy and provided care with dignity and respect. One person said they were 'impressed' with the service and their care worker was, 'excellent'. They said that they felt safe with the staff that cared for them. People said that staff listened to their views about the care they needed.

However, people also said that staff did not always turn up for visits on time. One person said, "there are often occasions when they arrive late and don't stay for the whole allotted duration'.

We found that the people who used the service were involved in their care planning and received personalised care and support which was based on an assessment of their needs. Appropriate checks were carried out to ensure only suitable people were employed and staff received suitable support and supervision. Care records were stored safely and were mostly up-to-date.

24 October 2011

During a routine inspection

People we spoke to told us they were very happy and satisfied with the service. They told us they were involved in the decision-making process related to their care, were kept well informed and were given opportunities to provide feedback on the quality of the service.