• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Community Options Limited - 56 High Street

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

56 High Street, Chislehurst, Kent, BR7 5AQ (020) 8468 7016

Provided and run by:
Community Options

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

21 October 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This focused inspection took place on 21 October 2015 and was unannounced. At the previous comprehensive inspection on 31 March 2015 we had found a breach of the legal requirements in that the provider had failed to notify the Care Quality Commission (CQC) without delay of incidents that occurred within the home.

We carried out this inspection on 21 October 2015 to check action had been taken to address the breach of legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to this requirement. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Community Options Limited - 56 High Street on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Community Options 56 High Street, Chislehurst, Kent, provides accommodation and support for up to ten people with learning disabilities and mental health issues. At the time of our inspection the home was providing care and support to ten people.

There was a registered manager in post at this inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At this inspection on 21 October 2015 we found that the service had robust systems in place to ensure that reportable incidents were recorded correctly and notifications were sent to the appropriate organisations such as the CQC and local authority where required.

31 March 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 31 March 2015 and was unannounced. When we last visited the home on 2 May 2013 we found the service met all the regulations we looked at.

Community Options 56 High Street, Chislehurst, Kent provides accommodation and support for up to ten people with learning disabilities and mental health issues. At the time of our inspection the home was providing care and support to ten people.

The home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

During our inspection we found that the provider had breached a regulation of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. You can see what action we have told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

Staff showed an awareness of the providers safeguarding policies and procedures and the whistle-blowing procedure should they need to use it. Assessments were undertaken to assess risks to people using the service. Risk assessments documented information and offered clear guidance to staff on what actions were required to reduce reoccurrence.

The provider had safe recruitment practices in place and appropriate recruitment checks were conducted before staff started work. Staff received regular support, supervision and training that supported them to meet people's needs effectively.

People's medicines were stored, recorded, managed and administered safely.

The home was clean and well maintained. Records showed that if maintenance issues were identified action plans were put into place to resolve issue quickly.

Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s right to make informed choices and decisions independently but where necessary for staff to act in someone’s best interest. Staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Depravation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) to ensure where appropriate requests to the local authority were made in accordance with the MCA to deprive people of their liberty where necessary to prevent harm.

People were supported to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs and ensure a balanced diet. Care plans and records highlighted people's specific nutritional needs and how they could be supported to promote a healthy diet. People had access to health and social care professionals when needed.

Staff displayed kindness and compassion toward people and we saw positive interactions between staff and people using the service. Staff responded to people respectfully when offering support and care plans detailed people's preferences, likes and dislikes and expressed wishes.

People were provided with information about the home and external agencies and were provided with opportunities to feedback about the service they received. People were involved in the planning of their care and staff encouraged people to be as independent as possible. Staff provided support to enable people to engage in a range of activities that reflected their interests.

The home had a complaints policy and procedure in place which was located in communal areas throughout the home. People told us they were aware of the home’s complaints procedure and would tell a member of staff if they had any concerns.

Although the provider had procedures and systems in place to evaluate and monitor the quality of the service we found that procedures were not always followed. The provider did not always ensure that notifiable incidents and accidents were reported to the CQC as required.

The home encouraged involvement from people, their relatives where appropriate and health and social care professionals in the monitoring and assessing of the quality of the service. Audits were conducted on a regular basis which included areas such as housekeeping, infection control, catering, health and safety and administration of medicines. Audits were up to date and records of actions taken to address highlighted concerns were completed.

2 May 2013

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us that they felt supported at the home and they met with staff to discuss their care planning alongside other healthcare professionals. Some people told us they were happy living at the home.

We found that the people who used the service were supported to be involved in their care planning and received a personalised care and support. The provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of the service.

11 October 2012

During a routine inspection

People we spoke with told us that they liked living at the home as the routine was not rigid like it was in their last home. People told us that staff respected them and were polite and courteous at all times and referred to them by their name.

One person said that they loved going out into the community shopping and were part of a walking group and that they felt supported by staff.