• Care Home
  • Care home

Kenbrook

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

100 Forty Avenue, Wembley, Middlesex, HA9 9PF (020) 8904 5818

Provided and run by:
Methodist Homes

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 10 October 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of this inspection we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

The inspection team consisted of 2 inspectors, a member of the CQC medicines team, a nurse, and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type

Kenbrook is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. Kenbrook is a care home with nursing care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Registered Manager

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced.

What we did before the inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make.

We looked at all the information we held about the provider, including notifications of significant events and contact from members of the public.

During the inspection

We spoke with 8 people who used the service and 4 visiting relatives and friends. We spoke with another relative on the telephone. We met staff on duty, who included the registered manager, the deputy manager, nurses, support workers, the activities coordinator and kitchen staff. We also met with an area manager who was visiting the service.

We observed how people were cared for and supported. Our observations included the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We looked at the care records for 14 people and other records used by the provider for managing the service. These included records of staff recruitment, training and support, meeting minutes, audits, and quality checks. We looked at how medicines were being managed. We looked at the environment and infection protection and control systems.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 10 October 2023

About the service

Kenbrook is a nursing home for up to 51 older people. At the time of our inspection, 51 people were living at the service. Some people were living with dementia.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were well cared for and received personalised care and support. They were happy living at the home, had good relationships with staff and were given choices about their care. Their relatives were also happy.

People were supported to stay safe. The risks to their wellbeing were assessed and planned for. They received their medicines safely and as prescribed. People were supported to access healthcare services. They had enough to eat and drink and they were offered chances to participate in a range of activities.

The provider considered people's equality and diversity needs, promoting different cultures, religions, and LGBT+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender) rights. They organised celebrations of people's different needs and provided information to help educate people living at the service and staff about these. There was a Chaplain attached to the home who supported people living there and staff to make sure their wellbeing and spiritual needs were considered and met.

There were enough suitable staff. There were systems for selecting and recruiting staff, as well as good training opportunities. Staff felt supported and worked well as a team.

There were effective systems for monitoring and improving quality at the service. These included recognising, reporting, and investigating when things went wrong. People told us the registered manager was approachable and supportive. There were clear actions, improvements and lessons learnt following adverse events, complaints and feedback from stakeholders.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more information, please read the detailed findings section of this report. If you are reading this as a separate summary, the full report can be found on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (Published 19 December 2017).

Why we inspected

We undertook this inspection based on the date of the last inspection.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.