• Care Home
  • Care home

Stones Place

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Skellingthorpe Road, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 0PA (01522) 684325

Provided and run by:
Methodist Homes

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Stones Place is a care home providing support for up to 42 people. There were 37 people using the service at the time of the inspection. The service supports adults aged 65 and over.

Who the service is for

Stones Place is a residential care home for older people. The service supports people to live independently for as long as possible whilst providing the care and support they need.

The home places a strong emphasis on helping people continue living meaningful and fulfilling lives. Staff support people in ways which enable them to remain connected to what is important to them whilst maintaining as much independence and choice as possible.

Our view of the service

We carried out this assessment on 10 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People were supported by staff who knew them well and had the skills and knowledge to support them safely. Risks were monitored and managed appropriately whilst promoting people's independence and choice. Medicines were managed safely and in a person-centred way, including supporting people to retain responsibility for their own medicines where appropriate. The home was clean and well maintained, with effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse and neglect.

People's needs were assessed and reviewed to ensure care remained responsive to changing circumstances. Staff worked effectively with healthcare professionals and were proactive in recognising when additional support was needed. Visiting professionals told us staff knew people well and were quick to recognise when needs changed. One professional told us, "Stones Place is generally one of our best-performing care homes. The staff are proactive and consistently support [people] to maintain their independence wherever possible. They know [people] extremely well and have a good understanding of their own competencies, as well as the roles of other services, making appropriate and timely referrals when additional support is required."

Staff respected people's rights and supported them to make decisions about their care and support. People were encouraged to maintain choice and control over their lives and were involved in decisions about how they wished to be supported. Staff understood the importance of seeking consent and supporting people to express their views, ensuring care was delivered in line with their wishes and preferences.

People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect by staff who had developed meaningful and trusting relationships with them. Staff supported people in ways which reflected their preferences and routines and encouraged them to remain as independent as possible.

The service demonstrated a strong commitment to helping people live fulfilling lives. People were supported to maintain interests and take part in meaningful activities both within the home and the wider community. People also had access to pastoral support and one-to-one engagement where this was important to them. For some people, this helped ensure their spiritual and religious needs were met in line with their wishes and preferences. For others, it provided opportunities for emotional support and meaningful conversation.

People were encouraged to influence how the home developed through meetings and surveys, and leaders responded positively to ideas about future projects. There was a strong culture of listening to feedback and using it constructively to drive improvements and continually enhance people's experiences of living at the home.

Leaders were visible and promoted an open and positive culture. People, relatives, staff and visiting professionals consistently spoke positively about the home. Professionals described positive working relationships with the service and highlighted the home's willingness to embrace learning and make changes which improved people's experiences and quality of care.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

19 January 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Stones Place is registered to provide accommodation and support for up to 42 older people. There were 31 people living in the home on the day of our inspection.

We found the following examples of good practice.

The provider had effective systems to ensure compliance with national policy requirements in areas including COVID-19 testing and visiting arrangements. To further strengthen practice in this area, a new staff role had been created to take the lead on all COVID-related administrative processes in the home.

18 September 2018

During a routine inspection

Stones Place is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Stones Place is located in Lincoln, Lincolnshire. The home provides residential care and support for up to 42 older people.

At our last inspection in February 2016 we rated the service good. At this inspection we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good.

This comprehensive inspection took place on the 18 September 2018 and was unannounced.

At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have a legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

People continued to receive a safe service. Staff were recruited in a safe way and were provided with training to ensure they had the skills and knowledge to deliver safe care. Staffing levels were sufficient to safely meet the needs of the people living in the home. Medicines were administered and managed safely. The manager implemented processes and systems to manage risk. Accidents and incidents were monitored and where necessary, actions taken to prevent them from reoccurring.

People continued to receive an effective service. Staff were provided with regular training to ensure that they could meet the needs of the people living in the home. This was regularly refreshed and updated. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice. Food and drink at the home was good quality and plentiful. The home worked together with a range of health and social care professionals to ensure that people’s health and wellbeing were well maintained.

People continued to receive a responsive service. Systems were in place to ensure that people were involved in planning and reviewing their own care and support needs and they were supported by person centred staff who understood their needs and wishes.

People continued to receive a caring service. The atmosphere in the home was inviting and friendly. Staff demonstrated that they had the right balance between being friendly and professional and treated people with respect and kindness. People living in the home were provided with regular opportunities to express their views which were listened to and acted upon. People’s privacy and dignity was respected and promoted.

People continued to receive a well-led service. The registered manager fostered an inclusive team culture, led by example and was visible to the staff and the people living in the home. The provider and registered manager implemented high standards of quality assurance, governance and audit systems, which were used to ensure that shortfalls were identified and improved.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

5 February 2016

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 5 February 2016 and was unannounced.

Stones Place is registered to provide accommodation for personal care for up to 42 older people. There were 38 people living at the service on the day of our inspection.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated

The Care Quality Commission is required by law to monitor how a provider applies the Mental Capacity Act, 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. DoLS are in place to protect people where they do not have capacity to make decisions and where it is considered necessary to restrict their freedom in some way. This is to protect them. The management and staff understood their responsibility and made appropriate referrals for assessment. One person at the time of our inspection had their freedom restricted under a DoLS authorisation.

People felt safe and were cared for by kind, caring and compassionate staff. People were kept safe. Staff undertook appropriate risk assessments for all aspects of their care and care plans were developed to support people’s individual needs. Staff knew what action to take and who to report to if they were concerned about the safety and welfare of the people in their care. People received their prescribed medicine safely from staff that had the competency to do so.

People were cared for by staff that were supported to undertake training to improve their knowledge and skills to perform their roles and responsibilities. People were given a choice of nutritious and home cooked meals. There were plenty of hot and cold drinks and snacks available between meals. People had their healthcare needs identified and were able to access healthcare professionals such as their GP or dentist. Staff knew how to access specialist professional help when needed.

People and their relatives told us that staff were kind and caring and we saw examples of good care practice. People were always treated with dignity and respect and enabled to make decisions about their care and treatment and maintain their independence. People were at the centre of the caring process and staff acknowledged them as unique individuals. People were enabled by a designated activity coordinator and team of volunteers to maintain their hobbies and interests, and build strong links with the local community.

There were systems in place to support people and their relatives to make comments about the service or raise concerns about the care they received. People and their families told us that the registered manager and staff were approachable. Staff were supported by a visible and effective leadership team.

The registered provider had robust systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and make improvements. Staff had access to professional development, supervision and feedback on their performance.

8 May 2013

During a routine inspection

Before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes. One person said, 'They always ask me if I'm ready for my shower.'

We observed staff interact with people throughout our visit. People were treated as individuals and staff spoke with dignity and respect. People experienced care, treatment and support that met their needs and protected their rights.

People told us the home was always clean. One person said, 'It a very nice home. The staff keep it clean and tidy.' We saw all areas of the home were clean and all furniture and equipment was in a good state of repair.

We saw there were effective systems in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.

We saw there were effective recruitment and selection processes in place.

We saw people had their comments and complaints listened to and acted on, without the fear that they would be discriminated against for making a complaint.

12 April 2012

During a routine inspection

The people we spoke with told us that they were happy living in the home. They said that staff talked to them in a respectful and polite way. They told us that they could make choices about their care and staff listened to them.

People told us that they felt safe living in the home. They said staff understood their needs and how to look after them.