• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Highfield Residential Care Home

Overall: Inadequate read more about inspection ratings

3 St Mary's Road, Cromer, Norfolk, NR27 9DJ (01263) 511421

Provided and run by:
Sterling Care (Uk) Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 26 February 2020

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014. The service was inspected on 15, 18 and 30 January 2019.

Inspection team:

The inspection was carried out by four inspectors, a medicines inspector and an expert by experience. An expert-by-experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.

Service and service type: Highfield Residential Care is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Highfield accommodates up to 20 people, some of whom may be living with dementia, in one adapted building. On the first two days of our inspection there were 18 people living in the home and on the third day of inspection there were 16 people.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided. In this case the registered manager was also the provider. For the purposes of this report they have been referred to as the provider.

Notice of inspection:

This inspection was unannounced.

What we did:

Before the inspection we reviewed the information we held about the home. This included any information we had received from the public or third parties such as the local authority. We also reviewed notifications the provider had sent us since our last inspection. Providers are required to notify the Care Quality Commission about events and incidents that occur including unexpected deaths, injuries to people receiving care and safeguarding matters.

We also reviewed information the provider had sent us. After our inspection published in November 2017 conditions were place on the registration and the provider was required to send us monthly reports covering the areas of risk to people using the service and the actions that they had taken to mitigate those risks.

During the inspection we spoke to

• Five people living in the service and two relatives.

• The provider

• The administrator

• The activities co-ordinator, two senior carers, three carers and the housekeeper.

• Two professionals who worked with the service.

We looked at

• Four peoples care records in depth, and specific sections within a further three care plans.

• Personal care records and daily records including food and fluid charts for five people.

• A member of the CQC medicines team looked at how the service managed people’s medicines and how information in 15 people’s medication records and care notes supported the safe handling of their medicines.

• We checked records in relation to the management of the service such as health and safety audits, audits of care records, records of meetings

• Four staff files including recruitment and training records.

Overall inspection

Inadequate

Updated 26 February 2020

About the service: Highfield Residential Care Home is a residential home that is registered to provide accommodation and personal care to a maximum of 20 people over the age of 65. At the time of inspection 18 people aged 65 and over were living in the home. On the third day of inspection there were 16 people living in the home.

People’s experience of using this service:

• People did not receive a service that provided them with safe, effective, compassionate and high quality care.

• Individual risks to people were not managed and mitigated including risks posed to people by the environment.

• There were not sufficient staff to meet people’s needs or keep them safe.

• People’s human rights were not always upheld as the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) were not adhered to.

• People were not always supported to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced diet.

• Peoples needs were not holistically assessed to ensure that staff were able to provide the care that people needed.

• People were not always treated with privacy and respect.

• The service was not well led and the provider did not have systems and processes in place to monitor the quality of the care that people received. There had been a consistent failure to improve and ensure care was delivered within the legal regulations of the Health and Social Care Act.

Rating at last inspection: At the previous two inspections in May 2018 and August 2017 the service was rated inadequate and placed into special measures. We identified breaches of regulations 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18 and 20A. At this inspection, we found that the necessary improvements had not been made. The service had six repeated breaches and a new breach of regulation 19.

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection.

Enforcement: Following the inspection in August 2017, we imposed conditions on the provider's registration because they failed to make the required improvements in relation to three of the regulations. These included regulations for safe care and treatment, meeting nutritional and hydration needs and good governance. The condition required the provider to submit monthly reports to the CQC in relation to risks to the environment, risks to individuals and review accidents and incidents. The provider sent us monthly reports, however these reports did not include detail of actions taken to address and mitigate risks both to individuals and in the environment.

Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found in inspections and appeals is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.