• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Lyndel Homes

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

9 Radnor Road, Handsworth, Birmingham, West Midlands, B20 3SP (0121) 507 0708

Provided and run by:
Mrs Delores Matadeen

All Inspections

26 October 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection was unannounced and took place on 26 October 2017. At the last comprehensive inspection in October 2015, we found the provider required improvement under the question of ‘Is the service caring’. At a focused responsive inspection in January 2017, we found the provider required improvement under the question of ‘Is the service well led.’ We found at this inspection improvements had been made.

Lyndal Homes, Radnor Road is registered to provide accommodation and support for up to 15 people with mental health needs. On the day of the inspection visit there were 15 people living at the home. The provider is also the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At the last comprehensive inspection in April 2015, the provider was found to be ‘requires improvement’ under the key question of ‘Is the service caring.’ At this inspection we found improvements had been made to the way people were supported which ensured their dignity and privacy was maintained. People told us staff were kind and caring and we observed caring interactions between people and staff throughout the inspection visit.

At the last focused inspection in January 2017, the provider was found to be ‘requires improvement’ under the key question of ‘Is the service well-led’. At this inspection we found improvements had been made to the provider’s recruitment processes to ensure staff were safely recruited and were suitable to work with vulnerable people. Improvements had also been made to the monitoring of the training delivered to staff to ensure they continued to meet people’s individual support needs.

People were safe at the home, supported by staff that knew people’s individual needs well. The provider had processes in place to support staff to protect people from the risk of abuse. Risk management processes had been reviewed to ensure staff received appropriate guidance on how to manage risks associated with people’s safety, health and well-being. There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s care and support needs and respond to people when required. People received their medicines as prescribed and systems used to manage medicines were safe and effective.

The provider was taking the appropriate action to ensure people who used the service were not unlawfully restricted and had processes in place to protect people’s rights.

People were supported with their nutritional and dietary needs and were offered a choice of meals. Snacks were also readily available to people to encourage a healthy nutritional intake. People were supported by staff who had the skills and knowledge to meet their care and support needs. People were supported to access healthcare professionals when they needed to and staff were aware of people’s health needs and how best to support them.

People were supported to maintain their independence where possible and were involved in decisions about their day to day care and support. Visitors were welcomed and staff recognised the importance of people maintaining relationships that were important to them.

People were satisfied with the range of activities available for them to participate in. People were involved in the planning and reviewing of their support. People knew how to complain if they were unhappy about any aspect of their care and support and there was a system in place to manage complaints.

People and staff told us they felt the home was well managed. People were asked for their feedback on the provision of service and this feedback was used to drive improvement. The provider had notified us of incidents and events as required by law.

12 January 2017

During an inspection looking at part of the service

This inspection took place on the 12 and 13 January 2017 and was unannounced on the first day but the registered manager knew we would be returning the second day

We last inspected Lyndel Homes on the 30 September and 01 October 2015 we found the provider had met the conditions of the fundamental standards in four of the five domains with an overall Good and a Requires Improvement under Caring. We carried out this responsive inspection because we had received concerns in relation to the provider’s recruitment practices and the effectiveness and frequency of training made available to staff.

This report only covers our findings in relation to those topics. A focused inspection differs to a comprehensive inspection as it is more targeted; looking at specific concerns rather than gathering a holistic view across a service. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Lyndel Homes on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Lyndel Homes is registered to provide residential accommodation and support to up to 15 adults with mental ill health needs. On the day of our visits there were 13 people living at the home.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The registered manager was also the registered provider.

People received safe and effective support because staff had completed training to support them to carry out their roles. We found all staff members had completed some training with a number of staff members having completed more training than their colleagues. All the staff showed their willingness to learn and was keen for more training to be made available to them. Staff training and recruitment files were not up to date but the provider was, in time, able to show us the information we requested. The provider agreed their administrative practices for the maintaining, updating and recording of this information should have been more efficient and required some improvement.

People were supported by staff that had been suitably recruited. We found the provider had adhered to their recruitment policy and was able to show that appropriate checks had been made for all staff members. This included a right to work within the UK, police checks and employment and character references had been obtained.

30 September and 1 October 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 30 September and 1 October 2015 and was unannounced. At the last inspection on 30 May 2013, we found the provider was meeting the requirements of the regulations we inspected.

Radnor Road is registered to provide residential accommodation and support for up to 15 adults with mental ill-health needs. At the time of our inspection, 15 people were living there.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Staff sought people’s consent before providing care and support. Staff were caring and treated people with respect and dignity but this also was not always consistent.

People that lived at the home felt staff were available to support them and keep them safe. Staff confirmed they could recognise abusive practices and knew who to report any concerns to. People received their medication as prescribed and staff knew how to reduce the risk of harm to people from unsafe medication practices. The provider had systems in place to keep people safe and protect them from the risk of harm.

There were sufficient numbers of staff available to meet people’s identified needs. The provider ensured staff were safely recruited and they received the necessary training to meet people’s support needs.

The provider was taking the appropriate action to ensure people who used the service were not unlawfully restricted and had processes in place to protect people’s rights.

People were able to choose what they ate and drank and they were supported to access health care professionals to ensure their health care needs were met.

People were supported to participate in social and leisure activities. People received appropriate care and support that was reflective of their needs. There was a complaints process and people and relatives felt confident their concerns would be listened to and responded to appropriately.

The provider had established management systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of service provided.

2 February 2015

During an inspection of this service

6 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We looked at records relating to people's care and observed staff caring for them. People told us and we saw that choices were offered and that people's views were sought and acted upon. One person who used the service told us, 'This is my home and staff help me with the things I want to do.'

Staff spoken to was able to tell us about people's needs so that they received care in a way that they preferred. One staff told us, 'People always choose and we help them.' Both relatives told us they were consulted about their relative's care and kept informed about their relative's health so they felt involved in their care.

We saw that people were relaxed in their environment and that systems were in place to keep people safe from harm. One relative told us, 'They are well looked after and safe there.'

Staff told us they had the training they needed so they knew how to support the people living there to meet their needs. Staff said they were well supported in their role.

There were systems in place to monitor how the home was run, to ensure people received a quality service.

30 May 2013

During a routine inspection

We looked at records relating to people's care and observed staff caring for them. People told us and we saw that choices were offered and that people's views were sought and acted upon. One person who used the service told us, 'I like it here, the staff listen to me so I can get things done the way I want them.'

All three care plans we looked at were up to date and we saw that they had been signed by people using the services to confirm they agreed with the plan of care. One person said, 'I know what's in my care plan because I agreed it.'

Staff spoken to was able to tell us about people's needs so that they received care in a way that they preferred. One staff told us, 'People always choose and we help them.' Both relatives told us they were consulted about their relative's care and kept informed about their relative's health so they felt involved in their care.

We saw that people were relaxed in their environment and that systems were in place to keep people safe from harm.

There were systems in place to monitor how the home was run, to ensure people received a quality service.

10 July 2012

During a routine inspection

There were eight people living there when we visited, one person was in hospital. Nobody knew we would be visiting that day.

We spoke with five people living there. We also spoke with the provider, the acting manager, two members of staff and two relatives who visited during the day. We looked at the records of two of the people living there and sampled the provider's records.

People said they were happy living at the home. One person said, "It's alright here." They said they made choices about what they ate and had chosen what colour their room had recently been redecorated in.

We saw that people were not supported to promote their independence. Staff did the domestic tasks in the home, people's laundry and served them their meals and drinks. People told us that they did not do much. One person said, "I just laze around." This does not help to promote people's self esteem and well being.

Records showed that people were referred to health professionals where needed and attended appointments for checks on their health and well being. We saw that generally staff followed the advice of health professionals. However, some records showed that staff were not recording appropriate action taken to manage one person's diabetes.

Records included an individual care plan and the person had been involved in this. Staff spoken with knew how to support people to meet their needs.

Medication records showed that people had been given their daily medication as it was prescribed for them. However, records did not record why people had been given medication to help calm them down when they were agitated or aggressive.

People told us that they did not go out often except to the local shop. Relatives told us that people did very few activities at the home. We saw that people sat around most of the day apart from briefly playing a game. Records showed that people did not do many activities which may impact on their health and well being.

People told us they felt safe living there and that the staff were easy to talk to. We observed good interactions between staff and the people living there. Staff spoken with knew how to safeguard the people living there from harm and had received training in this.

Staff told us they had the training they needed so they knew how to support the people living there to meet their needs. Staff said they were well supported in their role.

People told us they knew who to complain to if they were not happy and they thought their complaints would be taken seriously.

The people living there and their relatives had been recently asked to complete a survey with their views of the home. The responses from these had been positive. The people living there and their relatives were pleased with how the home was being redecorated and thought this had made a big improvement.

20 April 2012

During a routine inspection

People who use the home were positive about the care staff and the support they provided. One person who lived at the home said, 'oh yes, I really like it here'. Another person said, 'Its okay, I'm going out later with the staff'.

Throughout our visit we heard care staff speak with people in a kind and friendly way. We found that care staff spoke with people in a respectful manner and knocked on bedroom and bathroom doors before entering. The atmosphere in the home was pleasant.