30 October 2019
During a routine inspection
Drayton Wood provides accommodation and support to a maximum of 37 people living with learning disabilities, autistic spectrum disorders, mental health or physical health care needs. At the time of our inspection there were 34 people living at the service.
The service consisted of five houses, with single bedrooms, ensuite and communal bathroom and toilet facilities and shared lounges, kitchens and dining areas. Houses also had rooms for staff when providing “sleep in” cover over night. There was a day service unit attached to one of the houses, this offered activities to people living at the service and people attending the service who lived in the community.
The service has been designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This is designed to ensure that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence.
There were deliberately no identifying signs, intercom, cameras, industrial bins or anything else outside to indicate it was a care home. Staff were also discouraged from wearing anything that suggested they were care staff when coming and going with people.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
Environmental risks and concerns around medicines management were identified which did not always ensure people’s safety. Leadership and governance arrangements within the service were of concern, as they were not always identifying shortfalls and making changes to address them. There were breaches of regulation impacting on the quality of service provided to people.
People were not always supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not always support them in the least restrictive way possible; policies and systems in the service were not followed to support good practice.
People were accessing activities and the local community. Staff mainly treated people with kindness and were polite, and we received consistently positive feedback from people’s relatives about the care provided. However, we observed concerns in relation to how staff approached a situation during the inspection.
Management plans were in place for people needing support at the end of their life. The service told us they had good working relationships with health and social care organisations to ensure people received joined up care.
The registered manager encouraged people and their relatives to give feedback on the service, and areas for improvement through questionnaires and community meetings.
Rating at last inspection
The last rating for this service was Good, with Requires Improvement for the responsive key question (published 13 April 2017).
Why we inspected
This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.
Enforcement
We have identified breaches of regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, consent to care and support, having good governance systems and processes in place. Staff training, competency checks, managerial oversight of staff performance and pre-employment safety checks. Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.
Follow up
We will meet with the provider following this report being published to discuss how they will make changes to ensure they improve their rating to at least good and as part of this process we will ask for the service to provide a detailed improvement plan. We will work with the local authority to monitor progress. We will return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk