• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Roshini Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

25-26 Villiers Road, Southall, Middlesex, UB1 3BS (020) 8574 3663

Provided and run by:
Mrs S Birk

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

29 March 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 29 and 30 March 2017. The visit on 29 March was unannounced and we told the provider we would return on 30 March to complete the inspection. At our last inspection in October 2015 we found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 as the provider did not always ensure they followed legal processes when they deprived people using the service of their liberty. At this inspection we found the provider had taken action and, although there were restrictions on people using the service, the provider did not deprive them of their liberty unlawfully.

Roshini Care Home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 11 men and women with a mental illness. The provider, Mrs Birk, is registered with the Care Quality Commission as an individual and is in day to day charge of the service so it does not require a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The provider had a policy and procedures to keep people safe and staff understood these. Staff were able to tell us what they would do if they had concerns about people’s welfare.

There were enough staff to meet people’s care and support needs and the provider carried out checks on new staff to make sure they were suitable to work with people using the service.

People received the medicines they needed safely. When we pointed out some confusing information in the medicines records, the provider immediately contacted the GP and pharmacist to clarify guidance for staff.

Staff working in the service had the training and support they needed to work with people.

The provider understood their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. People were not deprived of their liberty unlawfully.

People told us they enjoyed the food provided in the service and they had access to the healthcare services they needed.

The staff who supported people were kind and caring. They knew people well and respected their privacy and dignity at all times.

People using the service were complimentary about staff working in the service and spoke positively about the care and support they received.

The provider assessed people’s care needs and reviewed these regularly to make sure people received the support they needed.

Staff delivered care and support in line with people’s preferences and their care plan.

People using the service enjoyed a range of activities, outings and holidays.

The provider had a complaints procedure and people told us they felt any concerns would be taken seriously and investigated.

The provider had managed the service for many years and we saw that they were passionate about the care and support people received and committed to improving the experience of people using the service.

The atmosphere in the service was relaxed and we saw that staff worked well together to meet people’s care and support needs.

The provider had systems in place to monitor quality in the service and make improvements.

12 and 14 October 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 12 and 14 October 2015 and the first day was unannounced. We last inspected the service in January 2014 when it met all of the regulations.

The service is a care home without nursing and provides accommodation and personal care to up to 11 people with mental health needs. When we inspected, 11 men and women with mental health needs were using the service.

The Care Quality Commission has registered the provider of the service, Mrs. Birk, as an individual and the service does not require a registered manager. Mrs. Birk is responsible for the day-to-day management of the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found one breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

The provider did not always ensure they followed legal processes when they deprived people using the service of their liberty.

People using the service told us they felt safe. They also told us they received the medicines they needed safely.

The provider carried out checks to make sure staff were suitable to work with people using the service and there were enough staff to meet people’s needs.

Staff received the training they needed to provide them with the skills and knowledge to care for and support people effectively.

Staff understood people’s right to make choices for themselves and where necessary, for staff to act in someone’s best interest.

Staff treated people with kindness and patience.

The provider assessed people’s care and support needs when they moved to the service.

The provider had a complaints procedure and people told us they knew how to make a complaint or what to do if they were unhappy about something.

The service was well-led by a provider who was visible and inclusive and spoke with passion about providing a good quality of life for the people at the service.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

2 January 2014

During a routine inspection

During our inspection we spoke with three people who use the service, the deputy manager a senior support worker, the chef and the manager, who is also the owner of the home.

People who use the service said they were able to spend their time as they wished and that the staff were friendly and gave them support when they needed it.

The staff demonstrated a working knowledge of each person's needs and how they liked to be supported. We observed that the people who use the service and the staff had developed positive relationships with each other and the staff treated people with respect and spoke with people in a courteous and professional manner.

People were involved in identifying where they needed support and how this was to be provided. This was reflected in the care plans and risk management plans which detailed how people's needs were to be met through their time at Roshini Care Home.

People were supported to eat nutritionally balanced needs that met their medical and cultural needs.

The staffing levels at the home were adequate to meet people's needs, and people said there were always staff available when they needed them.

19 October 2012

During a routine inspection

People told us they liked living at the home and that staff respected their privacy and dignity. Comments included 'Roshini care home is very good' and 'I'm well looked after'.

People said that they were involved in developing and reviewing their care plan and risk assessments. One person said 'I have seen my care plan and risk assessment and another told us 'I have signed my care plan'.

People told us that other healthcare professionals were involved in their care and staff supported them with attending appointments and meetings. People told us they were 'safe' and that they could raise any concerns with the manager and the staff. Relatives we spoke with commented 'I'm not worried at all; my family member is in safe hands' and '100% safe at the home'.

People said they liked the staff who were kind and caring. Relatives commented that staff understood and were meeting people's needs.