• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: The Elms

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

10 Repton Court, The Arbours, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN3 3RQ (01604) 411858

Provided and run by:
Mrs M L Duggan

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

12 October 2017

During a routine inspection

The Elms provides accommodation and personal care for up to three people with learning disabilities, and personal care for people with learning disabilities in shared lives accommodation. There were three people residing at The Elms and 32 people receiving personal care in their own homes at the time of the inspection.

At the last Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspection on 9 October 2015, the service was rated as Good. At this inspection the service has again been rated as Good.

The service provided safe care to people living in their own homes. Staff understood their responsibilities for safeguarding people from harm and followed the provider’s policies to provide people’s prescribed medicines safely.

There were enough suitably skilled staff to meet people’s needs. People received their care at the agreed times. Staff had been recruited using safe recruitment practices; people had been involved in developing interview questions to help find suitable staff.

People received care from staff that had received training to meet people’s specific needs and regular supervision to carry out their roles.

People received care from a regular staff group who knew them well which helped to develop positive relationships. People were treated with respect and helped to maintain their dignity.

People received a balanced diet from staff that understood their dietary needs. People were helped to maintain their independence and dignity through the consideration and support from staff.

People were supported to access healthcare professionals and staff worked closely with health services when required.

People’s risks were assessed and staff followed personalised care plans to mitigate these risks. Care plans were updated regularly and people and their relatives were involved in care planning where possible.

Staff sought people’s consent before providing care and people’s mental capacity was assessed in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The provider and manager continually assessed, monitored and evaluated the quality of the service to identify areas for improvement and implement change where required.

12 and 22 October 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 12 and 22 October 2015 and was unannounced.

The service is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to three people with learning disabilities and a personal care service to people with learning disabilities who live in either their own accommodation or accommodation they rent from the provider. At the time of our inspection there were 3 people living at The Elms and up to eight people who received personal care in their own homes. Everyone had received a service from the provider for a number of years.

We saw that people were well supported and cared for in relaxed and homely environments. Everyone we were able to speak to complimented the staff who supported them and where people had limited communication we observed that people were calm and responded positively to staff.

There were appropriate recruitment processes in place and people felt safe and were observed to interact positively with staff and each other. Staff understood their responsibilities to safeguard people and knew how to respond if they had any concerns.

Staff were supported through regular supervisions and undertook training which focussed on helping them to understand the needs of the people they were supporting. People were involved in decisions about the way in which their care and support was provided. Staff understood the need to undertake specific assessments if people lacked capacity to consent to their care and / or their day to day routines. People’s health care and nutritional needs were carefully considered and relevant health care professionals were appropriately involved in people’s care.

People received care from staff who were kind and compassionate and who were committed to respecting their individuality and promoting their independence. Their needs were assessed prior to receiving a service, individualised care plans were in place and were kept under review. Staff had taken time to understand peoples likes, dislikes and past life’s and enabled people to participate in activities either individually or in groups.

People were cared for by staff who were respectful of their dignity and who demonstrated an understanding of each person’s needs. This was evident in the way staff spoke to people and engaged in conversations with them. Relatives commented positively about the care their relative was receiving and it was evident that people and their families could approach management and staff to discuss any issues or concerns they had.

There were a variety of audits in place and action was taken to address any shortfalls. Management was visible and open to feedback, actively looking at ways to improve and develop the service.

10 December 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with a total of six people or relatives of people that used the service. People told us that they were happy with the service. One person told us “They really get to know to you” and another person told us “I get to do what I want to do”.

We spoke with four staff members that worked at the service. They had a good knowledge of people’s individual needs and they told us that they felt well supported in their roles.

We saw that people’s needs were assessed and care and support plans had been put in place to ensure that people’s needs were met. We saw that people’s care plans included information about things that were important to them and we found that these were respected by staff.

We found that appropriate checks were carried out on staff before they started work and that there was an effective complaints procedure available. We found that the manager of the service carried out quality assurance checks to ensure the quality of the service.

22 May 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people living at the home. One person told us that they were happy living at the Elms. They told us; 'it's nice here, I am able to ask for help if I need it and the staff help me'.

They also told us that they were able to make choices for themselves and that the staff supported them to do this. They said they enjoyed going out with the staff and that they were looking forward to going on a picnic that day.

One of the people was unable to tell us of their experience of living at the home due to their learning disability. We observed that the person looked happy and that staff were attentive and sensitive to their needs.