• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

97 Chaldon Road, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 5PJ (01883) 330687

Provided and run by:
Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Loving Care Domiciliary Services Limited is a domiciliary care agency. The service is registered to support younger and older adults, those with physical disabilities, people living with dementia and people with sensory impairments.

At the time of the assessment, 13 people were receiving the regulated activity of personal care.

We carried out this assessment on 22 June 2026.

This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
Risks were identified, assessed and managed, and staff understood the risks associated with people’s care. One member of staff told us, “Everything is on the care plan including the risk assessments. It has everything we need to know about risks, including around mobility and choking.” Staff were aware of their responsibilities in safeguarding people from abuse and neglect. One member of staff told us, “I would be looking out to see if someone was bruised, injured, distressed or generally anxious. I would inform the on call [manager]. I also have the contact details of the [safeguarding] team in my handbook.”

Incidents and concerns were reported and reviewed, and learning was used to improve practice. The registered manager told us, “We have incident and accident forms here, if anything has happened the carer will come to the office and fill out a report. If it was an incident for a service user at their home and involved a health and safety risk, I would go out and visit again and then put whatever needed to be done in place and update the care plan.”

Rotas were planned carefully to ensure staff had sufficient travel time in between care calls. One member of staff told us, “For the amount [of people] we have, there is enough staff to cover. We are given travel time between calls. If a call takes longer, I will tell the office.” Staff were provided with an effective induction and ongoing training and supervisions took place.

Assessments were completed before care started and reviewed when people’s needs changed. Staff worked with health and social care professionals where needed, supporting good outcomes and continuity of care. One member of staff told us, “We monitor how much someone has drunk and we encourage them to drink whilst we are there. The next carer can then see how much they have drunk. We encourage eating and give them what they want to eat.”

Staff understood the importance of maintaining dignity and privacy when supporting people in their own homes. People were treated as individuals, and care plans reflected people’s preferred routines, preferences and life history. One member of staff told us, “They [leaders] always tell us to treat people like they are your mum. I chat, I ask them questions, talk about their day and life. We chat a lot.”

Leaders listened to feedback and responded appropriately to concerns. There was also a robust complaints system in place. Care delivery was well organised and accessible, supporting reliable and consistent care visits. The registered manager told us, “When we do a care review we will go through the current care plan with people and make any changes.”

Leaders and staff understood the barriers people may face and actively worked to address them. One member of staff told us, “You don’t want people to feel different, [we need to ensure we are ] giving everyone the same opportunities.”

The service was well-led. Leaders promoted a clear direction focused on person‑centred care and continuous improvement. Governance systems provided oversight of quality, risk and performance. Leaders were approachable, and staff felt supported to raise concerns, contribute to learning and deliver safe, high‑quality care in people’s homes. One member of staff told us, “I do feel it’s well managed. Its open and friendly, I can come here [office] and talk about anything I like. It’s always supportive.”

Staff understood the value and ethos of the service with 1 member of staff telling us, “I am there for people, support their independence, make them feel valued and help them get through their life in a meaningful way. It’s a very lovely job.”
 

26 November 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: Loving Care is a domiciliary care service providing personal care and support for people in their own homes in Surrey. At the time of the inspection, 32 people were receiving personal care regulated by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

People’s experience of using this service and what we found: The service had systems to ensure risks were managed meaning people and staff were kept safe. People and their relatives told us they felt safe and spoke positively about the staff. People said their medicines were managed well and that staff were punctual for care appointments.

People received effective care from a well trained and supported staff team. There were systems to monitor staff performance through supervision. People told us that where needed, they were supported by staff to eat and drink.

People received personalised care that was responsive to their needs and preferences. People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. The policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff understood the importance of respecting people’s abilities and promoting independence. The service management and staff had built positive caring relationships with people and their families. The service aimed to achieve the best possible outcomes for people.

Care plans were person-centred. There was information about the level of support people required according to their assessed needs and preferences. There were systems to review care records and people felt involved in their care. People supported by the service told us they were treated with respect by caring staff. Feedback from people, their relatives and a healthcare professional we contacted was positive.

Staff spoke positively about their employment. There were systems being developed to allow staff to have opportunities to raise suggestions and be involved in the development of the service. The service worked in partnership with other healthcare professionals to ensure people received care that met their needs.

The service management used a variety of methods to assess and monitor the quality of the service. These included observations within people’s homes, auditing and surveys.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was Good (published October 2016)

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor the service through the information we receive. We will inspect in line with our inspection programme or sooner if required.

30 August 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 20 August 2016 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a domiciliary care and we needed to be sure that someone would be available.

Loving Care is a domiciliary care agency providing hourly support to people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection they were supporting 63 people.

There was a Registered Manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The provider was taking steps to improve the way that person-centred information was gathered to ensure that care plans were person-centred.

Risks to people were assessed and reviewed regularly to ensure people's individual needs were being met safely. People’s medicines were administered by trained staff and records were up to date to ensure medicines were administered safely.

Staff were deployed in a way that ensured people received care from regular staff who knew them well. A contingency plan was in place to ensure that people’s care could be provided safely in the event of staff being late or unavailable. The provider carried out checks on staff to ensure that they were suitable for their roles.

People told us that staff knew them well and that they were respectful in maintaining privacy and dignity when providing care in their homes.

People were encouraged to be independent and staff worked with people to offer choices when supporting them at mealtimes.

Staff understood their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act and demonstrated a good understanding of how to offer people choice. Records showed that staff worked alongside healthcare professionals where changes to people’s mental capacity were identified.

People told us that staff were competent and skilled in carrying out their role. The provider had effective arrangements in place to train, supervise and provide induction to staff. Staff told us they felt supported by the provider and could call for assistance at any time.

People told us they were confident to raise any issues about their care. There was a complaints policy in place and there was evidence that complaints had been recorded, investigated and responded to.

The service had systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided through seeking people’s feedback and carrying out audits. People told us they had seen improvements in their care. The manager had a vision for the future of the service and was taking steps to overcome identified challenges.

10 January 2014

During a routine inspection

At the time of this inspection the agency was providing personal care to 70 people. We telephoned them 48 hours before visiting to inform them of the inspection and to ask them to arrange for us to see two people who used the service in their homes.

We found that people or their representatives had been involved in the assessment and the planning of their care and its regular review. People we spoke with told us that they were listened to, treated with respect and felt safe.

People told us that they were satisfied with the quality of the service provided and received the support as described in their care plan. One person said "I am happy with my relative's care, particularly over the last year when their needs have increased and things have been quite challenging". Another said "My care is good, they spoil me and I would recommend them to anyone".

We saw that the medication system was robust and found that people were supported to receive their medicines safely and as prescribed.

The recruitment processes in place ensured that all staff had appropriate pre-employment checks before starting work and had undertaken the relevant training.

The provider had a system in place to assess and monitor the quality of the care and treatment people received. Feedback from people who used the service was sought and action was taken when required.

13 March 2013

During a routine inspection

People who used the service told us they were treated with respect and consideration and that they were encouraged to express their views and talk about the care and support they needed. One person told us 'I was involved in the planning of my care and I can always call the office if I need to change anything.' One person told us 'The staff are all friendly and treat me very well; they cannot do enough for me!' We were told by people that they knew about the complaints procedure and had been told how to make a complaint about the service they received. One person told us 'I know about the complaints procedure, I have been told about it but I have never needed to use it.'

Staff we spoke to demonstrated a good knowledge of the providers safeguarding policies and were able to clearly explain how they would recognise and report suspected abuse using the procedures the provider had in place. Staff told us the supervision and regular staff meetings enabled them to provide a good quality service to the people. One care worker told us 'I feel confident to deliver the care needs of the people I support and the managers support me to improve both my knowledge and skills.' People were complimentary about the provider and the quality of the care they received, and spoke positively about the professionalism of care staff. One person told us 'I am very happy with the service I receive, all the staff are professional in their approach and are able to support my needs.'

12 September 2011

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people using the service and five people's carers who represent them.

All people said that they are happy with the care and support provided. All said that their plan of care is discussed with them, their agreed plan of care is carried out and in the main they receive their care from familiar staff.

A majority of people said that the staff are polite, caring and respectful.

People said the staff never miss their calls ,they usually visit them on time but if they are running late they always telephone. Some people were particularly appreciative that the staff visited them in the bad weather last winter

People said they would be confident to approach the agency if they had any concerns.