• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Lymehurst

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

112 Ellesmere Road, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY1 2QT (01743) 351615

Provided and run by:
Mr Tay Sivri & Mrs Goulsen Sivri & Mrs Narin Perry & Mr Seref Sivri

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 1 June 2023

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

As part of this inspection, we looked at the infection control and prevention measures in place. This was conducted so we can understand the preparedness of the service in preventing or managing an infection outbreak, and to identify good practice we can share with other services.

Inspection team

This inspection was carried out by 1 inspector.

Service and service type

Lymehurst is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing and/or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement dependent on their registration with us. Lymehurst is a care home without nursing care. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Registered Manager

This provider is required to have a registered manager to oversee the delivery of regulated activities at this location. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Registered managers and providers are legally responsible for how the service is run, for the quality and safety of the care provided and compliance with regulations.

At the time of our inspection there was a registered manager in post.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced.

What we did before the inspection

We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return (PIR). This is information providers are required to send us annually with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make.

We asked the local authority and Healthwatch for any information they had which would aid our inspection. Local authorities together with other agencies may have responsibility for funding people who used the service and monitoring its quality. Healthwatch is an independent consumer champion that gathers and represents the views of the public about health and social care services in England. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We spoke with 3 people who used the service about their experience of the care provided. Additionally, we spoke with 3 staff members including the registered manager, deputy manager, and nominated individual. The nominated individual is responsible for supervising the management of the service on behalf of the provider.

We reviewed a range of records. This included 3 people’s care plans and multiple records of medicines administration. We looked at a variety of documents relating to the management of the service, including quality monitoring checks. We reviewed the recruitment process of 1 staff member.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 1 June 2023

About the service

Lymehurst is a residential home providing accommodation and personal care to 27 people aged 60 and over at the time of the inspection, some of whom were living with dementia. The service can support up to 35 people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were safe as the provider completed assessments of risk associated with their care and support. Staff knew people well and how to keep them safe from avoidable harm. The provider had made improvements to the physical environment and also to their infection prevention and control practices. The management team reviewed incidents, accidents and near miss incidents to see if something could be done differently to keep people safe.

People received their medicines safely and as prescribed by trained and competent staff. The provider completed regular checks to ensure people received their medicines when they needed them. Medicines were stored safely.

People were supported by enough staff who were available to assist them in a timely way. People were protected from the risks of ill-treatment and abuse as staff had been trained to recognise potential signs of abuse and understood what to do if they suspected harm or abuse. The provider followed safe recruitment processes.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and the provider supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the application of the policies and systems supported good practice.

The provider had made changes to their quality checks which were effective in identifying and driving good care. People felt engaged with decisions about where they lived, and their opinions were valued by those supporting them.

The provider, and management team, had good links with the local communities within which people lived.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 14 December 2022) and there were breaches of regulation. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations.

Why we inspected

This inspection was carried out to follow up on action we told the provider to take at the last inspection. We undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to the key questions safe and well led which contain those requirements. At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating. The overall rating for the service has changed from requires improvement to good. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Lymehurst on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.