You are here

Averlea Residential Home Good

Inspection Summary


Overall summary & rating

Good

Updated 2 April 2020

About the service

Averlea Residential Home is a care home providing personal care to 14 people, some of whom are living with dementia. People are primarily aged over 65 years. At the time of the inspection 14 people lived at the service. The home was on two floors, connected by a chair lift. The home had a lounge and dining room for communal use.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service had suitable safeguarding systems in place, and staff had received training about recognising abuse.

Risk assessment procedures were satisfactory so any risks to people were minimised.

The medicines system was managed effectively. The system was well organised, we did not find any errors, recording was to a good standard and people said they received their medicines on time. Staff received suitable training about medicines.

Staff were recruited appropriately. For example suitable references were obtained, for example when new staff had previously worked in a caring capacity. Checks from the Disclosure and Barring Service were obtained.

Staffing levels were satisfactory. We observed people receiving prompt support from care staff when required. People said they were happy with the support they received.

The building was clean, and there were appropriate procedures to ensure any infection control risks were minimised.

The service had suitable assessment systems to assist the registered provider to check they could meet people’s wishes and needs before admission was arranged.

People received enough to eat and drink. Some people said the quality of meals was good and they received a choice about the meals they received.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives. Staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. Policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Care planning systems were satisfactory. Care plans outlined people’s needs and were reviewed when people’s needs changed.

People received support from external health professionals and were encouraged to live healthier lives.

People said they received support from staff which was caring and respectful. Care promoted people’s dignity and independence. People were involved in decisions about their care.

Some activities were available. The registered manager, and people who used the service said there was currently further actions to develop activities on offer.

People felt confident raising any concerns or complaints. The service had an effective complaints procedure.

Staff induction procedures were satisfactory. Staff received suitable training to carry out their roles. Suitable records were available to demonstrate staff received regular one to one supervision with a senior member of staff.

The team worked well together and had the shared goal of providing a good service to people who lived at the home.

The service was managed effectively. People, relatives and staff had confidence in the management of the service.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 22 September 2017).

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

Inspection areas

Safe

Good

Updated 2 April 2020

The service was safe.

Details are in our safe findings below.

Effective

Good

Updated 2 April 2020

The service was effective.

Details are in our effective findings below.

Caring

Good

Updated 2 April 2020

The service was caring.

Details are in our caring findings below

Responsive

Good

Updated 2 April 2020

The service was responsive.

Details are in our responsive findings below.

Well-led

Good

Updated 2 April 2020

The service was well-led.

Details are in our Well-Led findings below.