• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Lifeways Community Care (Wiltshire)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

23 Evans Business Centre, Melksham, Wiltshire, SN12 6LH (01225) 702755

Provided and run by:
Lifeways Community Care Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

22 August 2017

During a routine inspection

Lifeways Community Care (Wiltshire) is a national organisation which provides care for people with specialist needs living in their own homes. Lifeways Community Care in Melksham has been operating since January 2014 to provide supported living services for people living in a range of housing provision in the local area. They provide personal care to adults over the age of 18.

This inspection took place on 22 and 23 August 2017 and was announced. The provider was given short notice because this gave the provider an opportunity to plan our visit with the people using the service. During the last inspection which concluded 17 April 2015 we rated the service good overall. However we rated the safe domain as requires improvement due to the amount of agency staff which sometimes resulted in a lack of staff consistency. The service demonstrated the amount of agency staff cover had reduced over recent months leading to the inspection.

At this inspection we found the service remained Good. However, how staff have been deployed to people receiving support in one city had been raised to us as a concern. We received feedback from two healthcare professionals prior to this inspection; both described how the inconsistency and on occasions, lack of staff had impacted negatively on people. The provider had recently decided it was not financially viable to continue providing the service, and had given notice to the individuals living in the city who were receiving support from Lifeways.

A registered manager was employed by the service who was present throughout the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager had taken action to improve the number of consistent staff to cover shortfalls. The registered manager said two local agencies are used where additional staff were required and this has helped to ensure consistency for people. All of the staff we spoke with said staffing levels had improved and the use of regular agency had provided consistency. The registered manager explained Lifeways had experienced difficulty recruiting staff, but had introduced incentives to improve staff recruitment.

People and staff described the management structure as being ‘more stable’. The registered manager provided clear leadership and more team leaders were in post to support the management of the service.

The registered manager worked closely with other agencies and promoted an open and transparent culture with a strong emphasis on continually striving to improve the service. There were effective systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service provided and the provider had a clear plan on further development of the service.

Staff knew how to report any safeguarding concerns and were aware of the provider's whistle blowing policy. People's care plans contained detailed risk assessments that covered areas such as skin integrity, mobility, nutrition and falls. Where people were at risk, their records outlined management plans on how to keep them safe. People were supported by sufficient staff to keep them safe and the provider ensured safe recruitment practices were followed.

People received their medicines as prescribed and medicines were stored safely and securely.

We saw positive interactions with staff who had built caring and respectful relationships with people they supported.

People had choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the procedures in the service supported this practice. People were supported to access health professionals when needed and to meet their nutritional needs.

People had opportunities to engage in a choice of activities which were meaningful to them.

People knew how to raise any issues and their concerns were responded to by the registered manager. The registered manager ensured peoples' and relatives' views were sought and appropriate action taken when required.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

23, 24 March & 17 April 2015.

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 23, 25, 26 March and we visited three people who used the service on the 17 April 2015. This was an announced inspection which meant the provider knew two days before we would be visiting. This was because the location provides a supported living service. We wanted to make sure the manager would be available to support our inspection, or someone who could act on their behalf.

Lifeways Community Care in Melksham has been operating since 7 January 2014 from well-equipped office building on the outskirts of Melksham. They provide supported living services for people living in a range of housing provision in the local area. People using the service are adults who live in their own homes, and some share a home. At the time of this inspection 22 people were receiving the service.

There was not a registered manager in post at the service at the time of our inspection, but the recently employed manager was in the process of becoming registered. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

The manager was accessible and approachable. Staff, people who used the service and relatives felt able to speak with the manager and provided feedback on the service.

We saw records to show formal complaints relating to the service had been dealt with effectively.

Perminant staff were knowledgeable of people’s preferences and care needs. People told us the regular staff they had provided them with the care and support they needed and expected. However we received negative feedback about the amount of agency staff which had been used, all of which stated this resulted in lack of consistency of staff sometimes and meant some people didn’t always feel safe. The manager showed us figures to show the reduction in the usage of agency from 2118 hours during October 2014 to using 1404 hours during March 2015. The manager explained this would reduce further in April as the recently recruited staff will have completed their induction and would be included on the new four week rolling rota.

We saw incidents of medicine errors by one agency staff had been reported and appropriate action had been taken.

Staff explained the importance of supporting people to make choices about their daily lives. Where necessary, staff contacted health and social care professionals for guidance and support.

From our observations staff members’ approach to people who use the service was warm and caring. We saw that positive praise and choices were offered and that communication was calm and respectful.

Each person had a care plan that outlined their needs and the support required. People were supported in a range of interests which suited their wishes, this included accessing their local community.

Staff had received regular training in mandatory subjects. Lifeways employ a person to provide face to face training to staff for the majority of subjects. However opinions varied regarding the effectiveness of E learning (computer based) training for the remaining few subjects. The team leaders and manager said the effectiveness of training is monitored through the supervision and if necessary disciplinary processes.

Four out of five staff we spoke with said they “felt supported”, however one out of five staff said they “did not receive regular supervision.” Each of the staff records we saw included records of staff receiving regular supervision of their performance.

All staff were clear about how to report any concerns they had. Staff were confident that any concerns raised would be fully investigated to ensure people were protected. The majority of staff were knowledgeable about the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005.