• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Victoria Oaklands

39 Dyke Road Avenue, Hove, East Sussex, BN3 6QA (01273) 330806

Provided and run by:
Victoria Nursing Home Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

27 November 2013

During a routine inspection

A previous registered manager had left the service. But their name remains on the report until an application has been made to remove this.

There were 18 people who used the service at the time of our visit. We looked at supporting care documentation, records in relation to the management of the service and staff documentation. We observed care staff supporting people in the service. We spoke with the registered manager (referred to as manager in the report),a registered nurse who was the deputy manager, two care workers, a domestic assistant, a maintenance person, six people who used the service and a visiting relative.

This told us people's care needs had been assessed and reviewed, and care and treatment had been planned and delivered as detailed in their individual care plan. Comments received from people who used the service included, 'I could not believe how good it was,' and 'The staff are very approachable. We all came in and they organised a cup of tea.'

Infection control policies and procedures were in place to protect people. All the people we spoke with told us they thought the service was kept clean.

Appropriate arrangements were in place to ensure people were cared for in an environment that was adequately maintained.

Recruitment policies and procedures were in place to protect people. Appropriate identity and security checks had been completed as part of the recruitment process.

We found that the processes in place to respond to complaints had ensured information provided was used to improve the service.

25 January 2013

During a routine inspection

There were 20 people who used the service at the time of our visit. There was a new registered manager. The organisation had informed us that the previous registered manager had left. However the previous registered manager had not deregistered with the CQC at the time of the inspection; therefore their name still remains on any reports until such time this information is received. We spoke with the registered manager who is referred to as manager in the report, a registered nurse, three care workers, a chef, five people who used the service and two relatives. We observed care staff supporting people and looked at care/staff documentation. This told us people had been asked for their consent for any care or treatment, and that staff had acted in accordance with their wishes. We were able to see that people or their representatives had been involved in making decisions about their care and treatment.

Records showed that people's care needs had been assessed, planned,reviewed and delivered in line with their individual care plan. Care staff understood their care needs and had completed appropriate training. One person who used the service commented ' I am really happy.'

People were protected from the risks of inadequate nutrition and dehydration.

Appropriate arrangements were in place in relation to obtaining, storing, administering handling and recording medicines.

The records for the management of the home were accurate and complete.

26 January 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke to five people using the service and two visiting relatives, who told us that they were very happy with the care, provided and had been involved in the drawing up of their care plan.

Staff members we spoke to told us that they were happy working in the home, that the team worked well together and that they had received the training and supervision they needed to meet individual people's care needs.