• Care Home
  • Care home

Rowan/Beech House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

23 Galliard Road, Edmonton, London, N9 7NY (020) 8804 4398

Provided and run by:
Connifers Care Limited

All Inspections

11 November 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Rowan House and Beech House provides care and support for nine people who have mental health needs. There were eight people using the service when we visited.

Rowan/Beech House comprises of two residential care homes in different locations but within close proximity to each other. Both homes are terraced housing over two floors with a back garden area.

We found the following examples of good practice

•The provider had appropriate arrangements for visiting to help prevent the spread of Covid 19. All visitors were required to have their temperatures taken and complete a Covid 19 risk assessment form on arrival. All visitors were expected to wear a face covering.

• The service had a garden area to facilitate safe visiting for families.

•The provider had appropriate arrangements to test people and staff for Covid 19 and was following government guidance on testing.

•The provider had ample Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) at the service to ensure that staff could provide care safely. We saw that the majority of staff had attended training regarding Covid 19 and the appropriate use of PPE.

• Although the provider was not keeping formal risk assessments for staff, their health and well-being were being discussed in supervision and staff were enabled to access the furlough scheme if necessary.

•Thorough cleaning was done daily of all communal areas and people's bedrooms.

•The provider ensured that people using the service could maintain links with family members and friends. People were supported to keep in touch by phone and virtual technology. Weather permitting the garden area and an external room were available for family visiting.

•All people admitted to the home were required to have a test before admission. The registered manager had developed a protocol to enable the safe admission to the service.

•The provider had a named external clinical lead who was providing regular weekly contact with the service.

We were mostly assured that the service met good infection prevention and control guidelines.

¿Whilst there have been no cases of CV-19 at the service, we were not confident that all staff were wearing PPE at all times at both of the services. The registered manager told us they would ensure additional checks were made f and appropriate use of PPE was discussed at each supervision and team meeting.

¿Whilst we could see the provider had updated policies in March 2020 regarding Covid 19, current written policies did not always reflect current government guidance and best practice. The registered manager acknowledged this was the case. However, the majority of staff understood and were working within best practice guidelines. The registered manager sent us a plan for the provider to update all the policies to ensure they were accurately reflecting current practice.

¿Since the visit the registered manager put further controls in place to ensure full compliance with good infection prevention and control guidelines. One staff member who had not undertaken suitable training has since completed this. There are also additional checks for staff in the use and disposal of PPE.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

9 January 2018

During a routine inspection

At our last inspection on 25 July 2014 we rated the service good. At this inspection, on 9 and 16 January 2017, we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and on-going monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

Rowan House and Beech House provides care and support for nine people who have mental health needs. There were nine people using the service when we visited. Rowan/Beech House comprises of two residential care homes in different locations but within close proximity to each other. Both homes are terrace housing over two floors with a well-kept back garden area.

People told us that they felt safe within the service and well supported by staff. We saw positive and friendly interactions between staff and people. People were treated with dignity and respect.

Procedures relating to safeguarding people from harm were in place and staff understood what to do and how to report it if people were at risk of harm. Information on how to report any safeguarding issues was clearly displayed in each home.

The homes were aware of how to ensure infection control when working with people. Staff were supplied with gloves and aprons to ensure that people were safe.

People were supported to maintain a healthy lifestyle and had healthcare appointments that met their needs. These were recorded and monitored on a regular basis. Medicines were administered safely and on time. Staff had completed training in medicines administration.

Staff received regular supervision and an annual appraisal that helped them identify areas for learning and development. Supervisions and appraisals were used as an opportunity for staff to improve care practices.

People are supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service support this practice.

There were person centred care plans that allowed staff to provide appropriate support to people. Care plans stated people’s likes and dislikes and contained detailed life histories and information regarding people’s mental health and wellbeing.

Staff knew people well and displayed caring and warm attitudes. Staff understood how to work with each person according to their individual needs. People were treated with dignity and respect.

The homes had detailed quality assurance systems in place. Regular audits around medicines, care plans and risk assessments and the environment were completed with action plans to ensure and issues found were addressed.

There were systems in place to identify maintenance issues. Staff were aware of how to report and follow up maintenance.

The homes had an open a transparent management style. There were regular staff meetings and staff felt comfortable raising any issues and felt that they were listened to. Directors and the registered manager held meetings and feedback sessions for staff and people. Surveys sent to people and relatives received positive feedback.

25 July 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and to pilot a new inspection process being introduced by CQC which looked at the overall quality of the service.

We undertook an unannounced inspection to Rowan House and Beech House on 25 July 2014. Rowan House and Beech House provides care and support for nine people who have mental health needs. There were nine people using the service when we visited.

At our last inspection on 20 June 2013 the service met the regulations inspected.

The service had a registered manager who had been in post since December 2010. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were kept safe. Staff knew what to do if people could not make decisions about their care needs.

People were involved in decisions about their care and how their needs would be met. Risk assessments identified the risks to people and how these could be prevented. Staff were available to meet people's needs.

Staff had access to on going training. They were knowledgeable about their roles and responsibilities. They had the skills and knowledge to meet people’s support needs.

People were supported to eat and drink. Staff supported people to attend healthcare appointments and liaised with their GP and other healthcare professionals as required to meet people’s needs.

People received individualised support that met their needs. Staff knew how to respond to people's needs in a way that promoted their individual preferences and choices regarding their care.

The management team was accessible and approachable. Staff, people who used the service and relatives felt able to speak with the manager and provided feedback on the service. People and staff were involved in decisions about the service. Monthly audits were carried out across various aspects of the service, these included the administration of medication, care planning and training and development. Where these audits identified that improvements were needed action had been taken to improve the service for people.

20 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We saw that staff understood people's needs. People were spoken to in an appropriate manner. The two people we spoke with told us that they received the care and support they needed. One person said, “staff are nice, it a good here.” People told us that they liked their meals. We asked people about the variety of food provided and a person said, “I buy my food, and can cook my own meals."

We talked to staff and looked at the storage and record keeping of medication. Staff were able to explain how they administered medication to people safely. We observed staff administering medication and saw that they checked the medication administration record before giving people their medicines. Staff told us and records confirmed that they had completed training on the safe administration of medicines. Medicines were handled appropriately.

There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place. Staff told us that they had been through a detailed recruitment process that included completing an application form and interviews. References were taken up from their former employers. People's personal records were accurate, and had been reviewed and updated at regular intervals. Care records gave an explanation of how people's needs were to be met. This meant that care records supported staff to provide safe and appropriate care to people who use the service.

1 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We observed that people were involved and consulted about decisions affecting their care. A person said, "staff listen to what I have to say." We saw that staff understood people's needs. One person said, "they support me to be as independent." Care plans gave guidance for staff about how they should meet people's needs. People were able to access all parts of the home safely. People had been consulted about how they wished their bedrooms to be decorated. We saw that they had personal items in their bedrooms. These reflected their personal interests and cultural backgrounds.

People said to us that staff were available to help them. A person told us, "there is always enough staff around to give me the help I need." We saw that staff understood people's needs and how to support them. Staff were able to explain how they met the needs of people. We observed that staff kept records relating to people who use the service securely in the office. We saw that staff knew how to communicate with people. They maintained confidentiality by not sharing information when other people were present.

15, 20 June 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

People told us they were involved and consulted about decisions that affect their care. A person said, 'Its good living here, there is always someone to talk to.' They had been provided with an individualised activities programme. A person told us, 'I can go to the shops and swimming.'

We saw that they had personal items in their bedrooms. We walked around the home and found that it was in need of redecoration and refurbishment. People felt that staff were not always available to meet their needs. They felt that staff were busy. This meant that at times they could not find a member of staff to talk to about their care.

People spoken to told us that they liked the food. When asked about the food a person commented, 'The food is quite nice. I get enough to eat..' People spoken to confirmed that they trusted staff and felt safe. They could discuss their concerns with the staff.