• Care Home
  • Care home

The Maples Residential Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

First Avenue, Porthill, Newcastle Under Lyme, Staffordshire, ST5 8QX (01782) 636129

Provided and run by:
Maple Care Limited

All Inspections

22 March 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

The Maples Residential Home is a care home providing personal care for up to 28 people. At the time of the inspection 25 people were living there including people living with dementia. The building is an adapted three storey building.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People were cared for by staff in a way that kept them safe and protected them from avoidable harm.

Enough staff were available to respond to people’s needs in a timely manner.

People received their medicines when they needed them, and systems were in place to ensure that medicines were stored and administered safely and that adequate supplies were available.

Accidents and Incidents were investigated, and measures were taken to prevent re-occurrences.

The premises were clean, and staff knew and followed infection control principles.

People gave us positive feedback about the quality of care they received.

The feedback on the leadership of the service and the manager from people and staff was positive.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published January 2019)

Why we inspected

We undertook this focussed inspection due to concerns we had received about the Maples Residential Home not responding to people’s medical needs in a timely manner. As a result, we undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe and well-led only. The ratings from the previous comprehensive inspection for those key questions not looked at on this occasion were used in calculating the overall rating at this inspection.

We have found no evidence that the provider needed to make improvements.

The overall rating for the service has remained the same. This is based on the findings at this inspection.

We reviewed the information we held about the service. No areas of concern were identified in the other key questions. We therefore did not inspect them. We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to coronavirus and other infection outbreaks effectively.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for The Maples Residential Home on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our reinspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

4 December 2018

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 4th December 2018 and was unannounced.

The Maples is a Residential Care Home. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

The Maples provides personal care and support for up to 28 people in one adapted building. There were 24 people living in the home at the time of the inspection.

There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.’

At our last inspection, we rated the service Good. At this inspection, we found the evidence continued to support the rating of Good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating has not changed since our last inspection. However, some improvements were needed to the checks in place to ensure people were having good quality care and Well Led was rated as requires Improvement.

People who used the service felt safe. Risk assessments were undertaken and reviewed and staff knew how to manage risk to people effectively. Staffing levels were sufficient to meet people’s needs and staff were recruited safely. Medicine was administered safely.

People’s needs and choices were assessed. Staff were skilled and had the knowledge to deliver effective care. People were supported to maintain a healthy diet. People had access to consistent care and the support of other health professionals when needed. The home had been designed to meet people's different needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People were supported by kind and caring staff who displayed empathy and compassion. Staff considered communication needs and supported people to express their views. People were supported to maintain their privacy and dignity.

People and their relatives were involved in people’s care. People were supported to follow their interests and their preferences were understood. People and relatives understood how to make a complaint.

People and relatives told us that they found the management team open and approachable. The registered manager was aware of their legal responsibilities. The provider had systems in place to ensure they looked for continual improvement and worked in partnership with other professionals.

21 October 2015

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 21 October 2015 and was unannounced.

The Maples provides personal care and support for up to 28 people. There were 27 people living in the home at the time of the inspection.

Our previous inspection on 14 June 2013 identified that the provider was meeting the standards relating to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010

There was a registered manager in post in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People’s risks were assessed in a way that kept them safe from the risk of harm. People’s rights to be as independent as possible were respected and promoted.People who used the service received their medicines safely.

We found that there were enough suitably qualified staff provided to meet people’s care and support needs. Staff were trained to carry out their role and were provided with appropriate training. The provider had safe recruitment procedures that ensured people were supported by suitable staff.

Advice had been sought from other agencies to ensure formal authorisations were in place for people who may be restricted. There were other people living in the home who may require a mental capacity assessment and this had not been done.

Staff were kind and caring and treated people with respect. People’s privacy and dignity were maintained and people’s rights upheld.

People were regularly supported with hobbies and interests that were important to them and were assisted to maintain close links with family and friends.

People and/or their representatives were regularly involved in planning and reviewing their care.

The provider had a complaints procedure available for people who used the service and complaints were appropriately managed.

Staff told us they were supported in their role and the registered manager led the team well. Staff received supervision of their practice and had opportunities to meet regularly as teams.

The provider had systems in place to monitor and improve the service. The service was well managed and people felt that the manager and provider were accessible and supportive.

14 June 2013

During a routine inspection

The registered manager of The Maples residential home is Mrs Jill Adams. Mrs Adams details did not appear on the CQC website at the time of publication of this report.

We saw that people were free to make decisions about day to day issues and influence how they spent their time at the home. People were treated with respect and their rights were upheld.

We found that staff had a good knowledge of people's needs and this reflected what was contained in care records. Information was available to enable staff to keep people safe and provide them with appropriate care.

We saw that medicines were stored correctly and people received the correct medication at the correct times. Medication records were completed correctly.

Staff we spoke with told us that they liked working at The Maples. Staff said they were happy with the training and supervision they received.

The service took account of people's views and responded to them, although sometimes the service did not always record this in a way which enabled them to evidence it.

26 September 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Dignity and Nutrition

People told us what it was like to live at this home and described how they were treated by staff and their involvement in making choices about their care. They also told us about the quality and choice of food and drink available. This was because this inspection was part of a themed inspection programme to assess whether older people living in care homes are treated with dignity and respect and whether their nutritional needs are met.

The inspection team was led by a CQC inspector joined by an 'expert by experience' (people who have experience of using services and who can provide that perspective) and a practising professional.

Many of the people who lived at the home were not able to talk to us directly about their care and support because of their dementia so we used the Short Observational Framework Inspection tool (SOFI) to observe how care and support were delivered. We saw that staff engaged continuously with people, and that people responded positively and took pleasure in staff's small gestures and conversations.

We talked with seven people who lived at the home, one relative and four staff about the care and support people received. One person we talked with said this was the best decision they had made and they 'loved' the place. They told us everything about the Maples was, 'Really good, the food and all the staff.'

A relative we spoke with told us their relation had been very well received and the place was, 'Very nice and clean' and, 'Everyone looked very warm and satisfied'.