• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Malbary House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

45 Carlton Street, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN16 8ED (01536) 481708

Provided and run by:
Mrs Jacqueline Miller

All Inspections

8 February 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Malbary House is a residential care home providing personal for up to 6 people. At the time of inspection, 3 people were using the service.

We found the following examples of good practice.

Visitors to the service were required to use hand sanitising facilities and use PPE whilst in the service.

A programme of testing for COVID-19 was in place for all staff and residents.

Stocks of PPE (personal protective equipment) were readily accessible to staff and visitors, and regular checks were made to ensure they were being used.

The service was small, and had not had any cases of Covid-19 with the people living there. People were able to self-isolate in their rooms if necessary.

Systems were in place to ensure staff and visitors to the service were kept up to date with current COVID-19 guidance. Risk assessments were in place regarding infection control.

The service was being regularly cleaned by staff to ensure infection control risks were kept to a minimum.

Staff were trained in infection prevention and control procedures.

12 September 2017

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 12 September 2017 and was unannounced.

Malbary House provides support for up to six people with Learning Disabilities. At the time of the inspection there were five people living at the home. At the last inspection in August 2015, the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found that the service remained Good.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People continued to receive care that was safe. We saw that staff had been appropriately recruited in to the service and security checks had taken place. There were enough staff to provide care and support to people to meet their needs. People were consistently protected from the risk of harm and received their prescribed medicines safely.

The care that people received continued to be effective. Staff had access to the support, supervision, training and on-going professional development that they required to work effectively in their roles. People were supported to maintain good health and nutrition.

People told us their relationships with staff were positive and caring. We saw that staff treated people with respect, kindness and courtesy. People had detailed personalised plans of care in place to enable staff to provide consistent care and support in line with people’s personal preferences.

People knew how to raise a concern or make a complaint and were confident that if they did, the management would respond to them appropriately. The provider had implemented effective systems to manage any complaints that they may receive.

The service had a positive ethos and an open and honest culture. The registered manager and deputy manager were present and visible within the home.

28 August 2015

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection took place on 28 August 2015. The home provides support for up to six people with Learning Disabilities. At the time of the inspection there were five people living at the home.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us that they felt safe in the home. Staff understood the need to protect people from harm and abuse and knew what action they should take if they had any concerns. Staffing levels ensured that people received the support they required at the times they needed. We observed that on the day of our inspection there were sufficient staff on duty. The recruitment practice protected people from being cared for by staff that were unsuitable to work at the home.

Care records contained risk assessments to protect people from identified risks and help to keep them safe. They gave information for staff on the identified risk and informed staff on the measures to take to minimise any risks.

People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed. Records showed that medicines were obtained, stored, administered and disposed of safely. People were supported to maintain good health and had access to healthcare services when needed.

People were actively involved in decision about their care and support needs. There were formal systems in place to assess people’s capacity for decision making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). People felt safe and there were clear lines of reporting safeguarding concerns to appropriate agencies and staff were knowledgeable about safeguarding adults.

Care plans were in place detailing how people wished to be supported and people were involved in making decisions about their care. People participated in a range of activities both in the home and in the community and received the support they needed to help them do this. People were able to choose where they spent their time and what they did.

Staff had good relationships with the people who lived at the home. Complaints were appropriately investigated and action was taken to make improvements to the service when this was found to be necessary. The registered manager was visible and accessible. Staff and people living in the home were confident that issues would be addressed and that any concerns they had would be listened to.

22 July 2013

During a routine inspection

On the day of our inspection we saw that the people who lived in the home were well cared for and supported by the staff in their daily routines.

We saw that the staff knew the individual preferences of the people who lived in the home and that care was provided to meet the personal needs of each individual who lived in the home.

We spoke to family members' of people who lived in the home and they told us, 'It is a lovely place for X to live. He is very happy there.'

When we reviewed some of the home's policies we found those which dealt with Record Keeping and Complaints would benefit from review and updating. The Provider agreed to undertake a review and provide more detailed information about thier Complaints and Record Keeping arrangements.

26 October 2012

During a routine inspection

We returned to the home to ensure staff had made improvements to outcome 16 and saw improvements in this area.

We observed staff talking with and assisting people throughout the day. This was done with the people's privacy and dignity in mind and showed the staff's awareness of peoples individual support needs.

We spoke to people using the service throughout our visit. Some of those had limited communication so we were unable to ascertain what a number people felt about their experiences.

We also looked at the copies of the latest quality assurance questionnaire and people made the following comments (we get) 'A warm greeting every time' (we visit); 'I feel the care plans are extremely good and I don't think I can add to it' and 'We agree the residents are more than happy and get great support to meet every appointment and social activities as well.'

We saw that there were sufficient numbers of staff to care for the people using the service and staff used a number of documents to ensure people's care was appropriate and safe. We looked at the medication system and noted that this was administered appropriately and was secure.

We looked at quality assurance and saw there is a variety of this used to ensure people are safe in the home.

21 July 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us that the staff at Malbary House give them the help they needed. They said they felt safe and liked the staff. They told us staff were 'friendly' and 'nice'. They told us staff are 'their family'.

Comments included, for example;

' 'I go on holiday. I like that.'

' 'I get my favourite dinner'

' 'I like watching my films in my room'