• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Cera Rotherham

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 5, Ashley Industrial Estate, Rawmarsh Road, Rotherham, S60 1RU (01709) 630240

Provided and run by:
Cera Homecare Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Date of Assessment: 28 May to 05 August 2025. Cera Rotherham is a domiciliary care service providing personal care to people in their own homes. The service supported people of all ages, with different health and care needs.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. Personal care indicates that a person requires help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. At the time of our visit, 209 people were receiving personal care.

An assessment has been undertaken of a specialist service that is registered for use by autistic people or people with a learning disability. At the time of the assessment, the service was not used by anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

This assessment was prompted in part due to concerns received about the service. At our last assessment the service was rated good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This inspection covered all quality statements under the key questions Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well led. During this assessment we found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from the concerns raised.

Staff were confident in their abilities to promote positive risk taking, which enabled people they supported the freedom to pursue their own interests and to live their lives as they chose.

Staff understood people’s individual ways of communicating and this enabled people to be listened to and supported in ways that met their needs. Care was delivered in ways that were person-centred and promoted people’s dignity, privacy and human rights. Support staff treated people with kindness and respect.

The provider had a culture of learning and people felt confident to raise concerns. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and helped people to manage risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience to provide care and support to people. The registered manager made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity and treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care and staff provided information in a way people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. The registered manager was visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles.

4 January 2023

During a routine inspection

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

At the time of the inspection, the location did not care or support for anyone with a learning disability or an autistic person. However, we assessed the care provision under Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture, as it is registered as a specialist service for this population group.

About the service

Cera Rotherham is a domiciliary care agency providing personal and nursing care to people in

their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 155 people using the service. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

Right Support:

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Risks associated with people’s care and support had been identified and were being monitored. An analysis of accidents and incidents was in place, to ensure that all incidents were effectively analysed to ensure lessons were learnt.

People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. Staff confirmed they received training in safeguarding and could explain what action they would take if they suspected abuse was taking place. People told us they were safe.

Right Care: Care is person-centred and promotes people’s dignity, privacy and human rights.

People told us staff were all kind and caring. People's privacy and dignity was maintained, and people were encouraged and supported to maintain their independence.

Right Culture: The ethos, values, attitudes and behaviours of leaders and care staff ensure people using services lead confident, inclusive and empowered lives.

Audits had identified areas that needed strengthening and improvement and action had been taken to address this. We saw a detailed action plan which had achievable and realistic timescales for action to be taken. Information technology systems were used effectively to monitor and improve the quality of care.

Formal feedback was gathered from people to see if they were receiving a good service. Wider feedback had not yet been gathered from staff and stakeholders. However, we were told there were plans to gather feedback later in the year to ensure everyone had the opportunity to provide input.

Appropriate information and assessments were shared with other relevant agencies for the benefit of people who use the service. The service worked in partnership with other professionals, for example GP's, district nurses to ensure people health needs had been met.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for the service under the previous provider was good, published on 5 October 2019.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations and to provide a rating for the service.

This was an ‘inspection using remote technology’. This means we did not visit the office location and instead used technology such as electronic file sharing to gather information, and video and phone calls to engage with people using the service as part of this performance review and assessment.