• Care Home
  • Care home

Pemberton Fold

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Pemberton Street, Little Hulton, Manchester, M38 9LR (0151) 420 3637

Provided and run by:
Park Homes (UK) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

All Inspections

2 August 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Pemberton Fold is a residential care home providing personal care for up to 60 people aged 65 and over. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 41 people, some living with a diagnosis of dementia.

The home has 4 separate units, or households, all with ensuite facilities. Each household operates as a self-contained unit with 15 bedrooms, communal areas such as a lounge, dining area and bathrooms, and a small satellite kitchen. The home also benefits from a hairdresser’s salon, a large activities room and external gardens.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People's medicines were not managed safely. We identified issues with staff training and competency checks, gaps in recording and stock balance errors. The monitoring of temperatures of the rooms and fridges where medicines were stored was not consistent.

Not all risks associated with people's care were documented and managed in a way which kept them safe. There were enough staff to keep people safe and meet their needs. There were occasions when staffing levels might be lower, for example during instances of short notice unplanned staff absences, however, people we spoke with told us they felt safe.

Premises checks and all maintenance records were up to date. Required test and safety certificates were in place. Systems were in place to protect people from abuse and people told us they felt safe living at the home. The environment was spacious and dementia-friendly, although some outside garden areas were overgrown and potentially unsafe. A new contract was in place to address this.

Staff training was documented on a matrix, although some elements of refresher training were not up to date for all staff. Staff received relevant training to perform their roles and help meet people's needs. People’s dietary needs were communicated to catering staff on admission into the home. People had mixed views on the food. Three people complained to us that the food wasn’t always hot. As people’s needs changed, referrals were made to relevant professionals for assessment and advice to ensure they could eat and drink safely.

Care plans were now electronic and did not always contain enough detail or reflect people’s care preferences. People and their relatives were involved in care planning, but we were not assured this was reflected on electronic systems.

The team of activity co-ordinators had increased to 3. Activities had improved and the team encouraged people to become involved in both group and individual activities. The home benefited from a large activity room and grounds outside the home. End-of-life care provision was supportive and compassionate.

Since the last inspection there had been limited involvement and oversight from the provider. Audits had not been undertaken in line with company policy, nor had they been effective in identifying and resolving areas for improvement to ensure compliance with the regulations. The provider had not ensured staff were adequately trained and competent in using new electronic systems, and support with this had been delayed.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 23 February 2023) and there were breaches of regulation. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve. At this inspection we found the provider remained in breach of regulations. The service remains rated requires improvement. This service has been rated requires improvement for the last two consecutive inspections.

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part by notification of an incident following which a person using the service died. This incident is subject to further investigation by CQC as to whether any regulatory action should be taken. As a result, this inspection did not examine the circumstances of the incident. However, the information shared with CQC about the incident indicated potential concerns about the management of risk of falls. This inspection examined those risks.

You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

We found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm from this concern. Please see the Safe sections of this full report.

For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.

We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 14 and 15 December 2022. Breaches of legal requirements were found. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve safe care and treatment and good governance.

We undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report covers our findings in relation to the Key Questions of Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led.

The overall rating for the service has remained requires improvement based on the findings at this inspection. We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the Safe, Responsive and Well-led sections of this full report. You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Pemberton Fold on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

14 December 2022

During a routine inspection

About the service

Pemberton Fold is a residential care home providing personal care for up to 60 people aged 65 and over. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 50 people. The home has 4 separate wings, known as ‘households’, all with ensuite facilities, in addition to several communal bathrooms and toilets, lounge and dining areas, a large activity area, hairdressing salon and enclosed garden areas. There were 15 people on Bridgewater household, 15 people on Cherry Tree household, 14 people on Singing Hill household and 6 people on Rose Mill household. Each household supported some people who were living with dementia.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People’s medicines were not managed safely. There were gaps in medicines records and staff guidance relating to ‘as required’ medicines was not always in place. The provider used a tool to measure people’s independence levels, however, staff felt they needed more staff. Staff were recruited safely. People were protected from the risk of abuse and told us they felt safe living at the home; relatives confirmed this. There were gaps in some people’s care planning information.

People’s food and fluid charts were not completed consistently and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) monitoring system was not accurate. We have made a recommendation regarding the best interest decision making process. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. There were ongoing issues with 1 of the 2 boilers and kitchen equipment. The provider was taking action to rectify the faults with the boiler and after the inspection, purchased additional kitchen equipment as necessary. The environment was dementia friendly, with clear signage in all areas to help people orientate around the building.

People told us they were well treated, and their equality and diversity were respected. People felt staff respected their privacy and dignity. Staff identified people’s communication needs and addressed these with appropriate actions. We observed kind and caring interactions between staff and people.

Care plans varied in detail and quality. Some contained a wide range of person centred information, however, others contained gaps. At the time of the inspection, the provider was in the process of transferring paper based care plans to an electronic care plan system. Seasonal activities had taken place, however people and their relatives told us daily activities were limited. A large activity room was not in use at the time of inspection due to the boiler issues. Action taken in response to concerns and complaints was not always documented. Not all people and their relatives had been involved in planning care

Audits had not always been effective and identifying and resolving areas for improvement and had not identified the issues we found with the safe management of medicines and gaps in care planning information. Following the inspection a new medication administration procedure was put into place and further staff training arranged. A number of issues had negatively affected staff morale and the views of people’s relatives about management were mixed.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service under the previous provider was good (published 10 March 2020).

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service.

The overall rating for the service has changed from good to requires improvement based on the findings of this inspection. We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the safe and well-led sections of this full report. During the inspection the provider demonstrated they had taken action to remedy some of the issues identified during the inspection. You can see what action we have asked the provider to take at the end of this full report.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Pemberton Fold on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified breaches in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance at this inspection. Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.