• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Creative Support - Warrington Personalised Services

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1st Floor, Empire Court, 30-40 Museum Street, Warrington, Cheshire, WA1 1HU (01925) 658797

Provided and run by:
Creative Support Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

09 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection was announced and took place on the 9 November 2015.

The agency was previously inspected in June 2014 when it was found to be meeting all the regulatory requirements which were inspected at that time.

Creative Support (Warrington Personalised Services) is a domiciliary care service that is part of Creative Support Ltd (The Provider). Creative Support is a 'Not for Profit' organisation.

The Warrington personalised service is coordinated from business premises in Museum Street, Warrington. The domiciliary care service in Warrington currently provides personal care and support to 10 adults with learning disabilities, physical disabilities and / or mental health care support needs who live within the Warrington district.

At the time of the inspection there was a registered manager at Creative Support (Warrington Personalised Services). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The registered manager of Creative Support (Warrington Personalised Services) was present during the two days of our inspection and engaged positively in the inspection process, together with other members of the office management team and staff.

People spoken with told us they felt safe and confirmed they had confidence in the staff that provided them with care and support. There were systems in place to protect people from abuse such as safeguarding training and policies and procedures on how to recognise and respond to suspicion or evidence of abuse. Staff were aware of the provider's procedures for reporting any safeguarding concerns and how to whistle blow.

Records showed that the needs of prospective service users had been assessed prior to using the service. Care and / or support plans and risk assessments had also been completed to ensure staff understood how to meet individual needs and keep people safe.

People using the service and / or their relatives told us that they received a reliable service. There were contingency arrangements in place to cover staff absences and robust procedures were followed for staff recruitment. This helped protect people against the risks of unsuitable staff gaining access to work with vulnerable adults.

People received appropriate support to manage their medicines. Staff received medicines training and systems were in place to check that medicine was administered as directed by the prescriber and to review daily balances.

Staff had access to induction, mandatory and other training that was relevant to their roles and responsibilities. Staff spoken with also confirmed that they had received formal supervision and attended team meetings at regular intervals.

Staff understood the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and were aware of the need to consider whether people had capacity. We noted that that files contained records of consent for areas such as care planning, administration of medicines and support with finances.

The provider had developed a complaints procedure and people using the service and / or relatives spoken with told us that in the event they needed to raise a concern they were confident they would be listened to and the issue of concern acted upon promptly.

Systems had been established to obtain feedback from people using the service and staff via annual surveys and a range of audits. The provider also undertook its own internal audits periodically, to monitor and review the standard of service delivered.

23, 24, 25 June 2014

During a routine inspection

We undertook an inspection of Creative Support ' Warrington Personalised Services from 23rd to 25th June 2014.

During our inspection we spoke with the service director, registered manager and three staff. We also spoke with two relatives and two people who used the service via the telephone.

We considered all the evidence we had gathered under the outcomes we inspected. We used the information to answer the five questions we always ask;

' Is the service safe?

' Is the service effective?

' Is the service caring?

' Is the service responsive?

' Is the service well led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, their relatives, the staff supporting them and from looking at records.

If you want to see the evidence supporting our summary please read the full report.

Is the service safe?

Policies and procedures had been developed by the registered provider (Creative Support Limited) to provide guidance for staff on how to safeguard the care and welfare of the people using the service.

Management spoken with demonstrated that they had a good understanding of the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act and how to access support for people who had difficulty in making their own complex decisions.

Likewise, staff spoken with confirmed they had received safeguarding training and had a good understanding of the different types of abuse, their duty of care to protect vulnerable adults and the action that should be taken in response to suspicion or evidence of abuse. Records showed that there had been no safeguarding incidents since the service was registered in December 2013.

We looked at a sample of recruitment records for the three most recently recruited staff in the service. Examination of records and discussion with staff confirmed prospective employees had undergone a comprehensive recruitment process prior to commencing employment with the provider. This helped to safeguard the welfare of vulnerable people.

Is the service effective?

Files viewed contained assessment and care / support plans from care managers (social workers or health care professionals) which outlined the needs, support requirements and objectives for each person. Service reviews were also undertaken periodically to review the effectiveness of the service and to involve people using the service and their representatives in planning for the future.

The registered provider had developed a 'Complaints, Suggestions and Compliments' policy. Information on the complaints procedure had also been included in the agency's 'Statement of Purpose' and 'Service User Handbook'.

Records viewed confirmed that no complaints had been received from people using the service since the service was registered.

People using the service and / or their representatives spoken with confirmed that they were aware of how to complain and confident that should they raise a complaint with the provider that their views would be listened to and acted upon.

Is the service caring?

People using the service and / or their representatives spoken with during the inspection confirmed they had confidence in the service to provide good standards of care and that people were treated in a dignified and caring manner.

Comments received from people using the service included: 'Things are fine and the service has improved 200%'; 'I feel safe and valued by my support staff' and 'I have no complaints. Generally, I'm quite happy with everything.'

Likewise, feedback received from the relatives of people using the service included: 'It's a good service that has much improved' and 'The staff from Creative Support work well with me and I have confidence in the care provided.'

Is the service responsive?

A range of records had also been produced and completed by the provider. For example: holistic assessments of need; person centred plans and support plans / guidelines had been completed for each person. This helped to ensure the needs and wishes of the people using the service were identified and planned for.

Likewise, a range of supporting documentation including: risk assessments; health action plans; health summary records; activity records; consent forms; service review records; summary of work notes and other miscellaneous documentation was also available for reference. Overall, records viewed had been kept under review and had been signed by people using the service or their representatives to confirm their agreement with the information recorded.

We spoke with support staff during our visit. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of the needs of the people they cared for and the value base of social care. Feedback received from people using the service and / or their representatives confirmed the service was responsive to individual needs.

Is the service well- led?

The service has a registered manager in place to provide direction and leadership to the staff team.

A range of internal and operational auditing systems had been established to enable the registered manager to maintain an overview of the service. For example: annual health and safety and physical environment checklists and monthly manager checklists were in place to monitor and review: people's personal records; staffing; supervisions; team meetings; environmental checks; complaints; safeguarding and other key areas.

The provider had also established systems to involve and obtain feedback from people using the service and / or their representatives. We noted that easy read surveys had not been used to help people understand the information. Likewise service specific survey results had not been produced for individual services. We have raised these points with the provider to help develop and improve the quality of future consultation processes.

Periodic monitoring of the standard of care provided to people funded via the local authority was also undertaken by Warrington Borough Council's Integrated Commissioning Team. This is an external monitoring process to ensure the service meets its contractual obligations.