• Care Home
  • Care home

Living Life (UK) Limited t/a the Banyan Tree - 53 Bostock Avenue

Overall: Outstanding read more about inspection ratings

Abington, Northampton, Northamptonshire, NN1 4LN (01604) 639859

Provided and run by:
Living Life (UK) Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Living Life (UK) Limited t/a the Banyan Tree - 53 Bostock Avenue on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Living Life (UK) Limited t/a the Banyan Tree - 53 Bostock Avenue, you can give feedback on this service.

30 January 2018

During a routine inspection

The Banyan Tree is a residential care home for up to four younger adults who may have learning disabilities, mental health needs, or emotional difficulties. At the last inspection in December 2015, the service was rated Outstanding. At this inspection we found the service remained Outstanding.

People with challenging and complex care needs were supported to be as independent as possible with a personalised amount of staff support. Staff supported people to make safe decisions, and when they were struggling they were supported to seek the help they required to maintain their own safety. Staff were exceptionally caring and compassionate and took great pride in their work and the relationships they had built with people to achieve great progress and positive outcomes for people.

People were supported to understand their own risks and comprehensive systems were in place to help people and staff maintain people’s safety. People were empowered to make their own decisions about their known risks and staff were aware when people needed additional support to enable them to do this.

Staffing requirements were flexible to meet the needs of people to help keep them safe, particularly during difficult times if people were in a period of distress or anxiety. The provider prioritised people’s welfare and arranged staffing to ensure people’s needs could be met. Staff were suitably recruited and appropriate checks were made on staff backgrounds.

People’s medication was handled sensitively and people were encouraged to manage their own medicines if they were able to. Staff tailored the support each person needed to manage their own medicines and staff ensured the medicines were safely stored.

People were supported to learn about infection prevention, cleanliness and the risks associated with poor hygiene practices. Staff ensured there were systems in place to maintain adequate standards and supported safe infection control practices.

Comprehensive assessments were in place to ensure that staff had all the information they needed to deliver the care and support people required. Staff training was personalised to meet the needs of people living at the home and staff were keen to learn and understand about people’s needs. People were fully supported to provide their consent to the care they received. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People's care needs were carefully monitored and staff worked proactively with external services to support people to have access to the support they required. The provider worked to identify and act on best practice and people received excellent support to have their health care needs met. Staff received personalised supervision which identified their strengths and areas for improvement and staff commented that this was effective and helped them to improve.

People were empowered, encouraged, and inspired to make their own decisions about their care. People were fully involved in making decisions which affected them and they were given honest and open information to understand their options. People were treated with compassion and were given opportunities to learn skills of independence when they were ready. Staff understood people’s needs well and had built relationships with people to help them get the best out of themselves.

People had comprehensive and unique care plans in place which provided information and guidance about how people preferred their care. The care plans were updated as people’s needs changed and staff were aware of people’s recent changes. People were encouraged to follow their goals and to make achievements when they were able. The staff worked with external agencies to help support people maintain employment or education if this was their wish and staff celebrated with people when they had done well or achieved a goal.

Staff had a great understanding of people’s likes and preferences and ensured people’s support was tailored to accommodate this. People were supported to pursue activities and interests they enjoyed and staff supported people to ensure these were achieved.

The home was well led and people and relatives had great respect for the registered manager and provider. There was clear leadership which helped to encourage people receive the care they needed when they needed it. People were consulted, involved, and encouraged to provide feedback which could help improve the service and the care they received. Governance systems helped to review the quality of the service and the registered manager was keen to receive feedback and listen to people and staff.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

31 December 2015 and 7 January 2016

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection took place on 31 December 2015 and 7 January 2016. The service provides support for up to four younger people who may have learning disabilities, mental health needs or emotional difficulties. At the time of the inspection there were three young people living at the home.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People felt very safe in the house and relatives said that they had no concerns about the arrangements that were in place to keep people safe. Staff built good relationships with people that enabled them to report any concerns to their own safety. People were heavily involved in compiling risk assessments and the service supported people to maintain their independence and take managed risks. Staff described to us their strong understanding of how to protect people from harm and abuse and knew what action they should take if they had any concerns. People were at risk of self harm and anxiety and staff put people in control of this wherever possible.

Staffing levels ensured that people received the support they required at the times they needed it. The service responded flexibly and robustly to ensure suitable staffing arrangements were available at all times. The recruitment practices were thorough and protected people from being cared for by staff that were unsuitable to work at the service, and people using the service were thoroughly involved in the recruitment procedures, with only the most appropriate best staff being selected for a job.

People were supported to take their medicines as prescribed. Records showed that medicines were obtained, stored, administered and disposed of safely. People were supported to maintain good health as staff had the knowledge and skills to support them and there was prompt and reliable access to healthcare services when needed.

Staff training was exceptional with personalised and specific training to meet the needs of people that used the service. The provider employed a psychologist to provide training and advice and this support was also utilised following any incidents of concern. Staff had access to regular and comprehensive support from management and were pleased with the level of support they received. People were very actively involved in decisions about their care and support needs and staff provided people with sufficient information to make their decisions. There were formal systems in place to assess people’s capacity for decision making under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). People were in control of their own healthcare arrangements and procedures were in place, with the agreement and understanding of people who used the service when staff would take control of this.

Staff had extremely good relationships with the people who lived at the home. People consistently commented on the positive impact staff had made on their lives, and how they had changed for the better. People understood that staff would support them during difficult times and could rely on staff to always be there for them, providing guidance when needed. People were empowered to make their own decisions and to take responsibility for them. Staff provided people with information and advice but encouraged people to make their own choices. Staff were aware of the importance of managing complaints promptly and in line with the provider’s policy. Staff and people living in the house were confident that issues would be addressed and that if they had any concerns they would be listened to.

Comprehensive care plans were in place detailing how people wished to be supported and had been produced in conjunction with people using the service. People understood the care and support they needed and were fully involved in making decisions about their support. People participated in a range of activities within the home or in the community and received the support they needed to help them to do this. People were able to choose how they spent their time and what activities they participated with.

The service was well led and people and staff commented on the strong leadership qualities and caring approach of the registered manager. People had great confidence in the registered manager and the way the service was run. The provider ensured the service was well supported and there were opportunities for people and staff to provide feedback about any improvements that could be made, and these were listened to and acted on. Extremely robust quality assurance systems were embedded into the service and the registered manager sought and acted on any areas that needed improving with immediate effect to ensure the service provided the best care personalised to the needs of each person.

17 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who used the service, a member of staff and the registered manager. We looked at two people's care plans, staffing levels and staff training information. We also looked at the procedures the provider had in place to manage people's medicines and respond to people's complaints.

People told us they were happy with the care provided at Living Life (UK) Limited t/a the Banyan Tree - 53 Bostock Avenue. One person said 'Staff are very caring and they support me to learn new skills'. They told us that they were learning to administer their own medication with support from the staff and said 'I keep my medication locked in my room and staff observe me when I take it'. Another person told us that they worked part time and enjoyed doing this activity. They told us they bought and cooked their own food and sometimes helped with domestic chores at the service.

People also told us that they knew how to make a complaint if they were not happy with the service received. They told us they were encouraged to express their views at their one to one and weekly meetings and felt they were listened to by staff and the manager.

We found that people were involved in making decisions about their care. We also saw that staffing levels were sufficient to meet people's needs and there were systems in place to administer people's medication and listen to people's complaints.

15 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We were informed on the day of the inspection visit that there were three people living at the home.

During our visit, we spoke with three young people who used the service. They told us that they liked living at the home because the staff listened and supported them to learn new skills. They also told us that they were involved in drawing up their own care plans with support from staff to help them meet their assessed needs and personal goals.

We spoke with two members of staff who were able to tell us about the individual needs of the people they cared for. They told us that they enjoyed working at the home. We also spoke to a visiting relative and they told us that the staff were very good at doing their job and they met their family member's care needs well.