• Doctor
  • GP practice

Langley Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Ewell Road, Surbiton, Surrey, KT6 6EZ (020) 8390 9996

Provided and run by:
Langley Medical Practice

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Surbiton Health Centre (Langley Medical Practice is a GP practice and delivers services to approximately 8,760 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that the ethnic make-up of the patient population is: 73.65% White, 14.3% Asian, 2.62% Black, 5.16% Mixed and 4.27% other.

Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is in the 9th decile (9 of 10). The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the practice, the context The practice was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

We carried out this assessment as part of our assessment programme as it is more than 5 years since we last assessed this practice.

The practice had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those important to people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The practice supported staff wellbeing.

People were involved in decisions about their care. The practice provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the practice took it seriously and acted on it. The practice was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The practice worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

7 January 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Surbiton Health Centre (Langley Medical Practice) on 7 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

The practice provided in-house clinics for dermoscopy and dermatology (including cryotherapy), musculoskeletal medicine, gynaecology (including chlamydia screening and coil fitting), and a nurse-led  chronic obstructive pulmonary disease clinic. The impact of providing these specialist services had been reviewed by the practice, and they had identified a significant reduction in hospital referrals, for example, referrals had reduced by 53% for dermatology, 27% for orthopaedics, and 14% for respiritory medicine.

However there were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • The practice should consider whether any action should be taken in response to patient feedback about the difficulties in contacting the practice by phone.

  • The practice should review the information available in the waiting area and consider whether additional health promotion literature should be made available.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice