• Care Home
  • Care home

Milton Residential Care Home Also known as Milton house

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

26 Muller Road, Horfield, Bristol, BS7 0AA (0117) 330 1220

Provided and run by:
Proctor Residential Care Home Ltd

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 16 November 2019

The inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team

The inspection was carried out by one inspector

Milton Residential Care Home is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Notice of inspection

This inspection was unannounced.

What we did before inspection

We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection.

We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all this information to plan our inspection.

During the inspection

We met five people who lived at the home to talk to them about their experience of the care provided.

We spoke with three members of staff including the registered manager and two support workers.

We reviewed a range of records. This included two people’s care records and five medicine records.

We looked at two staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision. A variety of records relating to the management of the service including policies and procedures were reviewed.

After the inspection

We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found. We received feedback from a professional who regularly visits the service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 16 November 2019

About the service : Milton Residential Care Home is registered to provide personal care and accommodation for up to seven people. The service supports people with complex mental health needs. We met five people on the day of our visit.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People felt they were very well supported and their full range of needs had been assessed.

Care plans and risk assessments were in place to support staff so people's individual needs could be met and risks minimised.

People told us positive things about life at the home. One comment was “The staff team are all very, very good they keep the place clean and tidy, they are always keen to help, if you want to do anything. You can have a laugh with them. "

Safe recruitment procedures were in place and staff were supported in their role with appropriate training and supervision. The staff and management team worked closely with health and social care professionals.

Medicines were managed safely by trained and competent staff. Medicines policies and procedures were up to date and easily available for staff. There was also best practice guidance. Emergency procedures and contingency plans were in place. Staff had access to and understood the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE). An infection control policy and procedure were in place and staff had completed training in this area

People knew about their care plans and told us they were included in regularly reviewing and updating them with the staff.

A very stable staff team had built up positive relationships with people and their relatives. They had a very good insight about how to meet each person's individual needs and really understood their routines and preferences. There was never any agency staff used. This was to ensure people had real continuity of care.

People's privacy and dignity was consistently respected. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests

People's dietary needs were assessed and met. People spoke positively about the support with menu planning.

People took part in variety of activities and spoke positively about these. People were encouraged to maintain contact with relatives and friends.

There were audit systems in place that identified areas for development and improvement. These were acted on to improve the care and service even more.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported support them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: The last rating for this service was Good, (report published March 2017)

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.