• Care Home
  • Care home

Coalway Lane

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2-8 Coalway Lane North, Swalwell, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE16 3EY (0191) 488 6877

Provided and run by:
Everyturn

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 30 May 2025

Date of Assessment: 23 September to 8 October 2025. Coalway Lane is a nursing home for up to 20 people with mental health difficulties. At the time of inspection, 18 people were using the service. The service design focuses on positive risk-taking, person-centered care, and supporting people to remain in control of their lives.

Since the last rated inspection, in 2018 and targeted inspection looking at infection control practices in 2022, the organisation has changed its name to Everyturn and there has been a change of manager. We completed this inspection because of the length of time, which had elapsed since the last full inspection was completed.

People found they were treated in a non-judgemental way and supported to reach their full potential. People discussed how staff had enabled them to deal with recent crises in their lives and supported them to take steps to return to living independently. The nature of the service meant staff deployment needed to be very flexible. Overall, there were enough core staff in place to ensure people’s needs were met and, when needed, additional staff could be readily obtained. The management team were currently completing a comprehensive review of the staffing tools they used to ensure they are sensitive to the flexibility of the service needs.

Staff worked closely with the crisis team and hospital staff teams to ensure people were only admitted when they were confident the service could meet the individual’s needs. Staff understood people's needs and how to manage any presenting risks and the assessments assisted staff to identify how to mitigate risks.

The clinical team had developed a comprehensive induction tool, which all staff working in the service were to complete. This included any new staff, agency staff and auxiliary staff who routinely worked at the service. We found this would effectively assist all staff understand the needs of people and any potential risks.

The provider’s ‘people team’ had ensured a robust training programme was in place. They constantly evaluated its effectiveness; in terms of the impact it had on how staff delivered the service; if it assisted staff to effectively support people to improve their mental health and whether it had assisted the organisation to embed the overriding cultural principles of ‘Here so no one struggles alone.’ The provider valued the diversity within the team. When this was going to be adversely affected because of a change in requirements for international workers the senior management and Trustees proactively changed their minimum pay scales. The People’s director is actively engaged in discussions with the government about salary sacrifice schemes and measures which would make sure there was equitable access to benefits.

The Trustees, senior managers, quality and safety team, clinical leadership teams and management team within the service constantly reviewed the operation of the service and actively made changes as and when these were needed. The empathetic, caring and person-centred approach demonstrated by senior leaders had filtered down and influenced the manner staff worked within the service. Their interactions were based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and the community.

The provider had created a new governance department, and they had ensured robust quality assurance measures were in place. The quality and safety team had designed systems that readily assisted them and the staff to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They continuously looked at the systems to see where enhancements could be made. Routine service reviews were completed, and these had been nuanced to suit each location. Both senior managers and trustees took part in these reviews and completed listening exercises with people who used the service.

Assessments were completed in a timely manner and were accurate. Staff actively used these assessments to understand people’s ongoing needs. The actions staff took from these assessments had led to a very positive outcome for people and the reduction of their distress.

People's experience of the service

Updated 30 May 2025

People were confident staff knew how to effectively support them and how to manage any potential risks. People found the service had enhanced their quality of life. People were very positive about the quality of their care and support offered at the service. Everyone we spoke with told us how caring and supportive the staff were and how they worked hard to ensure people’s needs were met. One relative said, “It seems really nice here and [person] has made real steps towards recovery.” A person said, “Coming here has made a real difference and I am so much better than I was before.”

People felt safe and their dignity and human rights were fully promoted. They were encouraged to make decisions. One person said, “You can ask anything, the staff are great, nothing is too much trouble. Staff are around to support and advice but I very much feel able to make the choices about how I move forward with my life, and I now feel much more in control.” People told us about the positive impact the service had had on their lives. A person said, “They have been very good here and really helped to get to a place where I feel ready to move back into my own place.” A relative said, “The staff have really helped [person] get their life back on track.”

People and relatives were very positive about how staff had supported individuals to manage crises in their mental health and return to leading independent lives. People told us they were consulted around how their care and support should be provided. All felt staff were competent and knowledgeable. They discussed how skilled staff were, how well they treated them and how their opinion was valued. People felt able to complain and were confident action would be taken and improvements would be made. Trustees and the senior management visited the service, held forums with people and were available when individuals wanted to contact them. For example, the chief executive was contacted by a person from the service who wanted changes to what internet pages they could access within the home. After listening to the person, the chief executive ensured the security firewalls were altered.