• Doctor
  • GP practice

Phoenix Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

33 Bell Lane, Burham, Rochester, ME1 3SX (01634) 867982

Provided and run by:
Dr Ruth Balami Thom

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

All Inspections

19 September 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced comprehensive follow up inspection at Phoenix Medical Practice on 19 September 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

The ratings for each key question are as follows:

Safe – Good

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at Phoenix Medical Practice on 10 June 2022. Overall, the practice was rated as Good. We rated the practice as Requires Improvement for providing safe services and Good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well- led services. A breach in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 was found and we issued a Requirement Notice as part of our enforcement action.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Phoenix Medical Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider.
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • A short site visit.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Good overall

We rated the practice as Good for providing safe services because:

  • Improvements had been made to ensure an effective approach was applied to the safe care and treatment of patients prescribed medicines that required routine monitoring and those with long-term conditions. Care, as well as treatment was being delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.

We checked the areas where the provider should make improvements from our last inspection and found:

  • The practice had completed their plan to ensure premises safety. For example, hot water pipe and cleaning risks had now been completed.
  • Staff had received the physical aspect of basic life support training.
  • The new systems for the checking of emergency equipment and medicines had been fully embedded.

We found no breaches of regulations. However, the areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to monitor newly implemented policies and procedures to ensure they are embedded effectively.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

10 June 2022

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection at Phoenix Medical Centre on 10 June 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good. The key questions of safe and effective are rated Requires Improvement and the key questions of responsive, caring and well-led are rated Good.

Safe - Requires Improvement

Effective - Good

Caring - Good

Responsive - Good

Well-led - Good

Why we carried out this inspection

This was an announced comprehensive inspection. The service was newly registered with CQC on 28 June 2021 and this inspection was undertaken to provide a rating for this service.

How we carried out the inspection

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing,
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider,
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider,
  • A short site visit,
  • Staff surveys.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall

We rated the practice Requires Improvement for providing safe services.

We found that:

  • Our clinical record searches found improvement was required in relation to the safe management and monitoring of high risk medicines.
  • Patients with long-term conditions were not always offered a structured annual review to check their health and medicines needs were being met. Care, as well as treatment were not always delivered in line with current legislation, standards and evidence-based guidance.

We rated the practice Good for providing effective, caring, responsive and well-led services.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of person-centre care.

We found one breach of regulations. The provider must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.

The provider should:

  • Continue with their plan to ensure premises safety. For example, hot water pipe and cleaning risks were identified.
  • Continue to monitor the waiting list for staff to receive the physical aspect of basic life support training.
  • Monitor and check that new systems for the checking of emergency equipment and medicines is embedded.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care