• Care Home
  • Care home

Stella Matutina Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

16 Clifton Drive, Ansdell, Lytham St Annes, Lancashire, FY8 5RQ (01253) 734834

Provided and run by:
Sisters of Charity of Jesus and Mary

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 23 February 2026

Date of assessment: 2 March to 19 March 2026. Stella Matutina is a care home, providing accommodation to people who require support with personal care. The home can provide support for up to 43 older people or younger adults, including those living with dementia. At the time of this assessment, 35 people were living at the home.

Staff took appropriate action when incidents occurred and systems were in place to protect people from abuse and neglect. Transitions were safe and person-centred. Care plans included robust information about risks to people. Regular health and safety checks were carried out, and robust fire safety measures were in place. Staff were recruited safely and were well trained. The home was clean with systems in place to maintain good infection prevention and control (IPC). Medicines were managed safely.

Care plans held a good level of information about people, and information about people’s needs was communicated effectively. Changes to best practice guidance and legislation was shared with staff. People were supported with their health and wellbeing, and outcomes were monitored. Managers and staff sought consent in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).

Staff were kind and caring, and treated people like individuals. People were supported to be as independent as possible, and have control over their lives. Regular activities took place at the home. Staff knew people well and could recognise when people were in pain or distress, and responded to clinical deterioration in a timely manner. Improvements were being made to staff wellbeing and morale.

People and relatives were involved in decisions about people’s care. Continuity of care was good and staff understood the needs of people living at the home. Information was given to people in a way they could understand; and systems were in place to seek feedback from people and their relatives about the safety and quality of care. The home was accessible and people were not discriminated against. People received good, compassionate end of life care.

The culture at the home was positive and person-centred. Managers were experienced and had the right skills. Improvements had been made to give staff more opportunities to speak up about issues. Reasonable adjustments were in place for staff who required them. The home had built positive links within the local community. Governance and oversight was good, and continuous improvement was prioritised.

However, we found some areas of the home needed to be made safer for those living with more advanced dementia. Recording of behaviours that communicated a need, emotion or distress needed to be more thorough. Improvements to communication, staff support and deployment needed embedding to further improve staff wellbeing.

People's experience of the service

Updated 23 February 2026

People and their relatives gave very positive feedback about the home and the care people received. Comments included, “I am happy with everything, I trust [staff] to look after me,” “If you are lucky enough to get in, I would recommend [the home],” and “It is a nice location as well as good care. [Person] has the best quality of life they could have.”

Relatives were complimentary about cleanliness at the home and the support people received to manage their personal hygiene. One relative told us, “I’m really impressed with the cleanliness of the home and how well [people] look.” Another added, “It always smells nice when I come in.”

People and relatives confirmed people were supported with their medicines and healthcare needs, and the GP was called if people became unwell. A person living at the home said, “I do get [medicines] at the same time, more or less. [staff] explain what I am taking, they manage my medicines well.”

We were told staff were kind and caring, and staff were seen to interact with people positively, with respect and compassion. There was a very relaxed and friendly atmosphere at the home. Comments included, “[Person] is very happy here,” “[Staff] are all lovely people,” and “I couldn’t be happier with [person’s] care.”

People felt staff were well trained, knowledgeable about their needs and worked well as a team to provide safe, good quality care. A person living at the home said, “I think [staff] are very knowledgeable. A new [staff member] can take time to get to know you but they are all helpful and kind.” Another added, “It is amazing how [staff] pull together .”

People also spoke positively about the support they received to practice their religion, the activities at the home and the standard of the food. However, we did receive mixed feedback about the timeliness of staff responses to call bells.